Currently when a read-only file has unlink() invoked on it on windows, the call
will fail. On unix, however, the call will succeed. In order to have a more
consistent behavior across platforms, this error is recognized on windows and
the file is changed to read-write before removal is attempted.
Currently when a read-only file has unlink() invoked on it on windows, the call
will fail. On unix, however, the call will succeed. In order to have a more
consistent behavior across platforms, this error is recognized on windows and
the file is changed to read-write before removal is attempted.
Not sure how to test this correctly I assume the current tests pass now because of the crate boundaries [and that this is fallout from private by default]?
In order to have the spawning semantics be the same for unix/windows, the
child's PATH environment variable needs to be searched rather than the parent's
environment variable.
If the child is inheriting the parent's PATH, then no action need be taken as
windows will do the heavy lifting. If the child specifies its own PATH, then it
is searched beforehand for the target program and the result is favored if a hit
is found.
cc #15149, but does not close the issue because libgreen still needs to be
updated.
In order to have the spawning semantics be the same for unix/windows, the
child's PATH environment variable needs to be searched rather than the parent's
environment variable.
If the child is inheriting the parent's PATH, then no action need be taken as
windows will do the heavy lifting. If the child specifies its own PATH, then it
is searched beforehand for the target program and the result is favored if a hit
is found.
cc #15149, but does not close the issue because libgreen still needs to be
updated.
This PR is the outcome of the library stabilization meeting for the
`liballoc::owned` and `libcore::cell` modules.
Aside from the stability attributes, there are a few breaking changes:
* The `owned` modules is now named `boxed`, to better represent its
contents. (`box` was unavailable, since it's a keyword.) This will
help avoid the misconception that `Box` plays a special role wrt
ownership.
* The `AnyOwnExt` extension trait is renamed to `BoxAny`, and its `move`
method is renamed to `downcast`, in both cases to improve clarity.
* The recently-added `AnySendOwnExt` extension trait is removed; it was
not being used and is unnecessary.
[breaking-change]
This PR is the outcome of the library stabilization meeting for the
`liballoc::owned` and `libcore::cell` modules.
Aside from the stability attributes, there are a few breaking changes:
* The `owned` modules is now named `boxed`, to better represent its
contents. (`box` was unavailable, since it's a keyword.) This will
help avoid the misconception that `Box` plays a special role wrt
ownership.
* The `AnyOwnExt` extension trait is renamed to `BoxAny`, and its `move`
method is renamed to `downcast`, in both cases to improve clarity.
* The recently-added `AnySendOwnExt` extension trait is removed; it was
not being used and is unnecessary.
[breaking-change]
This patch adds support for macros in method position. It follows roughly the template for Item macros, where an outer `Method` wrapper contains a `Method_` enum which can either be a macro invocation or a standard macro definition.
One note; adding support for macros that expand into multiple methods is not included here, but should be a simple parser change, since this patch updates the type of fold_macro to return a smallvector of methods.
For reviewers, please pay special attention to the parser changes; these are the ones I'm most concerned about.
Because of the small change to the interface of fold_method, this is a ...
[breaking change]
This change propagates to many locations, but because of the
Macro Exterminator (or, more properly, the invariant that it
protects), macro invocations can't occur downstream of expansion.
This means that in librustc and librustdoc, extracting the
desired field can simply assume that it can't be a macro
invocation. Functions in ast_util abstract over this check.
The new iterator takes a function and produces an infinite stream
of results of repeated applications of the function, starting from
the provided seed value.
Implementation by Kevin Ballard.
The function returns an Unfold iterator producing an infinite stream
of results of repeated applications of the function, starting from
the provided seed value.
* Don't warn about `#[crate_name]` if `--crate-name` is specified
* Don't warn about non camel case identifiers on `#[repr(C)]` structs
* Switch `mode` to `mode_t` in libc.
They used to be one token too long, so you'd see things like
```
rust/rust/test.rs:1:1: 2:2 warning: unused attribute,
rust/rust/test.rs:1 #![foo]
rust/rust/test.rs:2 #![bar]
```
instead of
```
test.rs:1:1: 1:8 warning: unused attribute, #[warn(unused_attribute)] on
by default
test.rs:1 #![foo]
^~~~~~~
```
Our AST definition can include macro invocations, which can expand into all kinds of things. Macro invocations are expanded away during expansion time, and the rest of the compiler doesn't have to deal with them. However, we have no way of enforcing this.
This patch adds two protective mechanisms.
First, it adds a (quick) explicit check that ensures there are no macro invocations remaining in the AST after expansion. Second, it updates the visit and fold mechanisms so that by default, they will not traverse macro invocations. It's easy enough to add this, if desired (it's documented in the source, and examples appear, e.g. in the IdentFinder.
Along the way, I also consulted with @sfackler to refactor the macro export mechanism so that it stores macro text spans in a side table, rather than leaving them in the AST.
If modified, you can safely unmap arbitrary memory. These fields are not
intended to be modified, so read-only accessors are the only ones that are
provided.
Closes#15478
If modified, you can safely unmap arbitrary memory. These fields are not
intended to be modified, so read-only accessors are the only ones that are
provided.
Closes#15478
If ldconfig fails it emits a warning. This is very possible when installing
to a non-system directory, so the warning tries to indicate that it may
not be a problem.
