Update cargo
8 commits in 70898e522116f6c23971e2a554b2dc85fd4c84cd..cc0a320879c17207bbfb96b5d778e28a2c62030d 2022-12-05 19:43:44 +0000 to 2022-12-14 14:46:57 +0000
- artifact deps should works when target field specified coexists with `optional = true` (rust-lang/cargo#11434)
- Add `home` crate to cargo crates (rust-lang/cargo#11359)
- Use proper git URL for GitHub repos (rust-lang/cargo#11475)
- Fixes flock(fd, LOCK_UN) emulation on Solaris. (rust-lang/cargo#11474)
- Allow Check targets needed for optional doc-scraping to fail without killing the build (rust-lang/cargo#11450)
- fix: gleaning rustdocflags from `target.cfg(…)` is not supported (rust-lang/cargo#11323)
- Fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#11470)
- resolver.md: Fix naming in example (rust-lang/cargo#11469)
r? `@ghost`
8 commits in 70898e522116f6c23971e2a554b2dc85fd4c84cd..cc0a320879c17207bbfb96b5d778e28a2c62030d
2022-12-05 19:43:44 +0000 to 2022-12-14 14:46:57 +0000
- artifact deps should works when target field specified coexists with `optional = true` (rust-lang/cargo#11434)
- Add `home` crate to cargo crates (rust-lang/cargo#11359)
- Use proper git URL for GitHub repos (rust-lang/cargo#11475)
- Fixes flock(fd, LOCK_UN) emulation on Solaris. (rust-lang/cargo#11474)
- Allow Check targets needed for optional doc-scraping to fail without killing the build (rust-lang/cargo#11450)
- fix: gleaning rustdocflags from `target.cfg(…)` is not supported (rust-lang/cargo#11323)
- Fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#11470)
- resolver.md: Fix naming in example (rust-lang/cargo#11469)
Add a test for #92481
The test was copied ad-hoc from #92481, but I can't get the test to pass, because of needing to get twice the same error on the last line of the source.
Closes#92481
Use more LFS functions.
On Linux, use mmap64, open64, openat64, and sendfile64 in place of their non-LFS counterparts.
This is relevant to #94173.
With these changes (together with rust-lang/backtrace-rs#501), the simple binaries I produce with rustc seem to have no non-LFS functions, so maybe #94173 is fixed. But I can't be sure if I've missed something and maybe some non-LFS functions could sneak in somehow.
rustdoc: simplify popover CSS
* Merge the color-changing block into the regular rules, which was probably written that way because it used to be in the theme files, but has no reason to be written this way now that it's in rustdoc.css
* Get rid of redundant `display: block`, since `position: absolute` blockifies the layout anyway.
fold instead of obliterating args
Fixes#105608
we call `const_eval_resolve` on the following constant:
```
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Unevaluated {
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Value(0x0),
_,
]
}
_,
],
```
when expanded out to `ConstKind::Expr` there are no infer vars so we attempt to evaluate it after replacing infer vars with garbage, however the current logic for replacing with garbage replaces _the whole arg containing the infer var_ rather than just the infer var. This means that after garbage replacement has occured we attempt to evaluate:
```
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
PLACEHOLDER,
PLACEHOLDER,
],
```
Which then leads to ctfe being unable to evaluate the const. With this PR we attempt to evaluate:
```
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Unevaluated {
def: playground::{impl#0}::and::{constant#0},
substs: [
ConstKind::Value(0x0),
PLACEHOLDER,
]
}
PLACEHOLDER,
],
```
which ctfe _can_ handle.
I am not entirely sure why this function is supposed to replace params with placeholders rather than just inference vars 🤔
Illegal sized bounds: only suggest mutability change if needed
In a scenario like
```rust
struct Type;
pub trait Trait {
fn function(&mut self)
where
Self: Sized;
}
impl Trait for Type {
fn function(&mut self) {}
}
fn main() {
(&mut Type as &mut dyn Trait).function();
}
```
the problem is Sized, not the mutability of self. Thus don't emit the "you need &T instead of &mut T" note, or the other way around, as all it does is just invert the mutability of whatever was supplied.
Fixes#103622.
Refine when invalid prefix case error arises
Fix cases where the "invalid base prefix for number literal" error arises with suffixes that look erroneously capitalized but which are actually invalid.
Add docs for question mark operator for Option
As a beginner learning rust, it took me a while to figure out what `?` was doing with Options. I think the documentation of this could be improved.
I've used the question mark documentation from the `Result` type as a template here, and tried to come up with a simple example as well.
Combine `ty::Projection` and `ty::Opaque` into `ty::Alias`
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/79.
This PR consolidates `ty::Projection` and `ty::Opaque` into a single `ty::Alias`, with an `AliasKind` and `AliasTy` type (renamed from `ty::ProjectionTy`, which is the inner data of `ty::Projection`) defined as so:
```
enum AliasKind {
Projection,
Opaque,
}
struct AliasTy<'tcx> {
def_id: DefId,
substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
}
```
Since we don't have access to `TyCtxt` in type flags computation, and because repeatedly calling `DefKind` on the def-id is expensive, these two types are distinguished with `ty::AliasKind`, conveniently glob-imported into `ty::{Projection, Opaque}`. For example:
```diff
match ty.kind() {
- ty::Opaque(..) =>
+ ty::Alias(ty::Opaque, ..) => {}
_ => {}
}
```
This PR also consolidates match arms that treated `ty::Opaque` and `ty::Projection` identically.
r? `@ghost`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #105147 (Allow unsafe through inline const)
- #105438 (Move some codegen-y methods from `rustc_hir_analysis::collect` -> `rustc_codegen_ssa`)
- #105464 (Support #[track_caller] on async closures)
- #105476 (Change pattern borrowing suggestions to be verbose and remove invalid suggestion)
- #105500 (Make some diagnostics not depend on the source of what they reference being available)
- #105628 (Small doc fixes)
- #105659 (Don't require owned data in `MaybeStorageLive`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't require owned data in `MaybeStorageLive`
Small improvement that avoids a clone. I don't expect this to have any noticeable perf effects, but better to have it than not to.
r? ``@tmiasko``
Change pattern borrowing suggestions to be verbose and remove invalid suggestion
Synthesize a more accurate span and use verbose suggestion output to
make the message clearer.
Do not suggest borrowing binding in pattern in let else. Fix#104838.
Move some codegen-y methods from `rustc_hir_analysis::collect` -> `rustc_codegen_ssa`
Unclear if they should live here, but they seem codegen-y enough, and `rustc_hir_analysis::collect` is extremely long, so it should probably lose some methods.
Allow unsafe through inline const
Handle similar to closures.
Address https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104087#issuecomment-1324173328
Note that this PR does not fix the issue for `unsafe { [0; function_requiring_unsafe()] }`. This is fundamentally unfixable for MIR unsafeck IMO.
This PR also does not fix unsafety checking for inline const in pattern position. It actually breaks it, allowing unsafe functions to be used in inline const in pattern position without unsafe blocks. Inline const in pattern position is not visible in MIR so ignored by MIR unsafety checking (currently it is also not checked by borrow checker, which is the reason why it's considered an incomplete feature).
`@rustbot` label: +T-lang +F-inline_const
Simpler diagnostic when passing arg to closure and missing borrow
fixes#64915
I followed roughly the instructions and the older PR #76362.
The number of references for the expected and the found types will be compared and depending on which has more the diagnostic will be emitted.
I'm not quite sure if my approach with the many `span_bug!`s is good, it could lead to some ICEs. Would it be better if those errors are ignored?
As far as I know the following code works similarly but in a different context. Is this probably reusable since it looks like it would emit better diagnostics?
a688a0305f/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/demand.rs (L713-L1061)
When running the tests locally, a codegen test failed. Is there something I can/ should do about that?
If you have some improvements/ corrections please say so and I will happily include them.
r? `@estebank` (as you added the mentoring instructions to the issue)
