abi: unsized field in union - assert to delay bug
Fixes#113279.
> Unions cannot have unsized fields, and as such, layout computation for
unions asserts that each union field is sized (as this would normally
have halted compilation earlier).
>
> However, if a generator ends up with an unsized local - a circumstance
in which an error will always have been emitted earlier, for example, if
attempting to dereference a `&str` - then the generator transform will
produce a union with an unsized field.
>
> Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110107, later passes will be run, such as constant propagation,
and can attempt layout computation on the generator, which will result
in layout computation of `str` in the context of it being a field of a
union - and so the aforementioned assertion would cause an ICE.
>
> It didn't seem appropriate to try and detect this case in the MIR body
and skip this specific pass; tainting the MIR body or delaying a bug
from the generator transform (or elsewhere) wouldn't prevent this either
(as neither would prevent the later pass from running); and tainting when
the deref of `&str` is reported, if that's possible, would unnecessarily
prevent potential other errors from being reported later in compilation,
and is very tailored to this specific case of getting a unsized type in
a generator.
>
> Given that this circumstance can only happen when an error should have
already been reported, the correct fix appears to be just changing the
assert to a delayed bug. This will still assert if there is some
circumstance where this occurs and no error has been reported, but it
won't crash the compiler in this instance.
While debugging this, I noticed a translation ICE in a delayed bug, so I fixed that too:
> During borrowck, the `MultiSpan` from a buffered diagnostic is cloned and
used to emit a delayed bug indicating a diagnostic was buffered - when
the buffered diagnostic is translated, then the cloned `MultiSpan` may
contain labels which can only render with the diagnostic's arguments, but
the delayed bug being emitted won't have those arguments. Adds a function
which clones `MultiSpan` without also cloning the contained labels, and
use this function when creating the buffered diagnostic delayed bug.
Unions cannot have unsized fields, and as such, layout computation for
unions asserts that each union field is sized (as this would normally
have halted compilation earlier).
However, if a generator ends up with an unsized local - a circumstance
in which an error will always have been emitted earlier, for example, if
attempting to dereference a `&str` - then the generator transform will
produce a union with an unsized field.
Since #110107, later passes will be run, such as constant propagation,
and can attempt layout computation on the generator, which will result
in layout computation of `str` in the context of it being a field of a
union - and so the aforementioned assertion would cause an ICE.
It didn't seem appropriate to try and detect this case in the MIR body
and skip this specific pass; tainting the MIR body or delaying a bug
from the generator transform (or elsewhere) wouldn't prevent this either
(as neither would prevent the later pass from running); and tainting when
the deref of `&str` is reported, if that's possible, would unnecessarily
prevent potential other errors from being reported later in compilation,
and is very tailored to this specific case of getting a unsized type in
a generator.
Given that this circumstance can only happen when an error should have
already been reported, the correct fix appears to be just changing the
assert to a delayed bug. This will still assert if there is some
circumstance where this occurs and no error has been reported, but it
won't crash the compiler in this instance.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Still more complexity, but this allows computing exact `NaiveLayout`s
for null-optimized enums, and thus allows calls like
`transmute::<Option<&T>, &U>()` to work in generic contexts.
Make struct layout not depend on unsizeable tail
fixes (after backport) https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112048
Since unsizing `Ptr<Foo<T>>` -> `Ptr<Foo<U>` just copies the pointer and adds the metadata, the layout of `Foo` must not depend on niches in and alignment of the tail `T`.
Nominating for beta 1.71, because it will have this issue: `@rustbot` label beta-nominated
Error message all end up passing into a function as an `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>`. If an error message is creatd as
`&format("...")` that means we allocate a string (in the `format!`
call), then take a reference, and then clone (allocating again) the
reference to produce the `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`, which is silly.
This commit removes the leading `&` from a lot of these cases. This
means the original `String` is moved into the
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`, avoiding the double allocations. This
requires changing some function argument types from `&str` to `String`
(when all arguments are `String`) or `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` (when some arguments are `String` and
some are `&str`).
For start-biased layout we want to avoid overpromoting so that
the niche doesn't get pushed back.
For end-biased layout we want to avoid promoting fields that
may contain one of the niches of interest.
Various minor Idx-related tweaks
Nothing particularly exciting here, but a couple of things I noticed as I was looking for more index conversions to simplify.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
The first PR for https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606
This is just the move-and-rename, because it's plenty big-and-bitrotty already. Future PRs will start using `FieldIdx` more broadly, and concomitantly removing `FieldIdx::new`s.
Since structs are always `VariantIdx(0)`, there's a bunch of files where the only reason they had `VariantIdx` or `vec::Idx` imported at all was to get the first variant.
So this uses a constant for that, and adds some doc-comments to `VariantIdx` while I'm there, since it doesn't have any today.
Previously, there were two queries to check whether a type allows the
0x01 or zeroed bitpattern.
I am planning on adding a further initness to check, truly uninit for
MaybeUninit, which would make this three queries. This seems overkill
for such a small feature, so this PR unifies them into one.
Default `repr(C)` enums to `c_int` size
This is what ISO C strongly implies this is correct, and
many processor-specific ABIs imply or mandate this size, so
"everyone" (LLVM, gcc...) defaults to emitting enums this way.
However, this is by no means guaranteed by ISO C,
and the bare-metal Arm targets show it can be overridden,
which rustc supports via `c-enum-min-bits` in a target.json.
The override is a flag named `-fshort-enums` in clang and gcc,
but introducing a CLI flag is probably unnecessary for rustc.
This flag can be used by non-Arm microcontroller targets,
like AVR and MSP430, but it is not enabled for them by default.
Rust programmers who know the size of a target's enums
can use explicit reprs, which also lets them match C23 code.
This change is most relevant to 16-bit targets: AVR and MSP430.
Most of rustc's targets use 32-bit ints, but ILP64 does exist.
Regardless, rustc should now correctly handle enums for
both very small and very large targets.
Thanks to William for confirming MSP430 behavior,
and to Waffle for better style and no-core `size_of` asserts.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#107361Fixesrust-lang/rust#77806
This is what ISO C strongly implies this is correct, and
many processor-specific ABIs imply or mandate this size, so
"everyone" (LLVM, gcc...) defaults to emitting enums this way.
However, this is by no means guaranteed by ISO C,
and the bare-metal Arm targets show it can be overridden,
which rustc supports via `c-enum-min-bits` in a target.json.
The override is a flag named `-fshort-enums` in clang and gcc,
but introducing a CLI flag is probably unnecessary for rustc.
This flag can be used by non-Arm microcontroller targets,
like AVR and MSP430, but it is not enabled for them by default.
Rust programmers who know the size of a target's enums
can use explicit reprs, which also lets them match C23 code.
This change is most relevant to 16-bit targets: AVR and MSP430.
Most of rustc's targets use 32-bit ints, but ILP64 does exist.
Regardless, rustc should now correctly handle enums for
both very small and very large targets.
Thanks to William for confirming MSP430 behavior,
and to Waffle for better style and no-core size_of asserts.
Co-authored-by: William D. Jones <thor0505@comcast.net>
Co-authored-by: Waffle Maybe <waffle.lapkin@gmail.com>
