Fix `std::os::fortanix_sgx::usercalls::raw::UsercallNrs`
It was 0-indexed but should be 1-indexed. This PR just removes the duplicate code and re-exports the internal enum.
Fixes https://github.com/fortanix/rust-sgx/issues/88
r? @joshtriplett
hir: add HirId to main Hir nodes
This is the 1st PR in a series dedicated to `HirId`-ification, i.e. deprecating `ast::NodeId`s after the AST > HIR lowering process. The bigger proof of concept can be seen in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57578.
**Phase 1**: store `HirId` in all remaining (some already have it) main HIR nodes (excluding `*Id` objects).
- [x] `Field`
- [x] `FieldPat`
- [x] `ForeignItem`
- [x] `GenericParam`
- [x] `Lifetime`
- [x] `MacroDef`
- [x] `PathSegment`
- [x] `PatKind::Binding`
- [x] `Stmt`
- [x] `StructField`
- [x] `TypeBinding`
- [x] `VariantData`
- [x] `WhereClause`
- [x] `WhereEqPredicate`
r? @Zoxc
Cc @varkor
targets: aarch64-unknown-none: Add +strict-align
On AArch64, an unaligned access causes a synchronous exception. In the current
state of the target, the compiler might generate unaligned accesses, see
https://github.com/rust-embedded/rust-raspi3-tutorial/issues/10.
Since this is a bare-metal target, it is possible that there is no exception
handling in place (yet) to recover from this case, causing a binary to just
silently fail.
Add `+strict-align` to avoid this case.
NVPTX target specification
This change adds a built-in `nvptx64-nvidia-cuda` GPGPU no-std target specification and a basic PTX assembly smoke tests.
The approach is taken here and the target spec is based on `ptx-linker`, a project started about 1.5 years ago. Key feature: bitcode object files being linked with LTO into the final module on the linker's side.
Prior to this change, the linker used a `ld` linker-flavor, but I think, having the special CLI convention is a more reliable way.
Questions about further progress on reliable CUDA workflow with Rust:
1. Is it possible to create a test suite `codegen-asm` to verify end-to-end integration with LLVM backend?
1. How would it be better to organise no-std `compile-fail` tests: add `#![no_std]` where possible and mark others as `ignore-nvptx` directive, or alternatively, introduce `compile-fail-no-std` test suite?
1. Can we have the `ptx-linker` eventually be integrated as `rls` or `clippy`? Hopefully, this should allow to statically link against LLVM used in Rust and get rid of the [current hacky solution](https://github.com/denzp/rustc-llvm-proxy).
1. Am I missing some methods from `rustc_codegen_ssa:🔙:linker::Linker` that can be useful for bitcode-only linking?
Currently, there are no major public CUDA projects written in Rust I'm aware of, but I'm expecting to have a built-in target will create a solid foundation for further experiments and awesome crates.
Related to #38789Fixes#38787Fixes#38786
On AArch64, an unaligned access causes a synchronous exception. In the current
state of the target, the compiler might generate unaligned accesses, see
https://github.com/rust-embedded/rust-raspi3-tutorial/issues/10.
Since this is a bare-metal target, it is possible that there is no exception
handling in place (yet) to recover from this case, causing a binary to just
silently fail.
Add `+strict-align` to avoid this case.
Implement public/private dependency feature
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44663
The core implementation is done - however, there are a few issues that still need to be resolved:
- [x] The `EXTERNAL_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCY` lint currently does notthing when the `public_private_dependencies` is not enabled. Should mentioning the lint (in an `allow` or `deny` attribute) be an error if the feature is not enabled? (Resolved- the feature was removed)
- [x] Crates with the name `core` and `std` are always marked public, without the need to explcitily specify them on the command line. Is this what we want to do? Do we want to allow`no_std`/`no_core` crates to explicitly control this in some way? (Resolved - private crates are now explicitly specified)
- [x] Should I add additional UI tests? (Resolved - added more tests)
- [x] Does it make sense to be able to allow/deny the `EXTERNAL_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCY` on an individual item? (Resolved - this is implemented)
Add suggestions to deprecation lints
Clippy used to do this suggestion, but the clippy lints happen after the deprecation lints so we ended up never seeing the structured suggestions.
Implement Weak::{strong_count, weak_count}
The counters are also useful on `Weak`, not just on strong references (`Rc` or `Arc`).
In situations where there are still strong references around, you can also get these counts by temporarily upgrading and adjusting the values accordingly. Using the methods introduced here is simpler to do, less error-prone (since you can't forget to adjust the counts), can also be used when no strong references are around anymore, and might be more efficient due to not having to temporarily create an `Rc`.
This is mainly useful in assertions or tests of complex data structures. Data structures might have internal invariants that make them the sole owner of a `Weak` pointer, and an assertion on the weak count could be used to ensure that this indeed happens as expected. Due to the presence of `Weak::upgrade`, the `strong_count` becomes less useful, but it still seems worthwhile to mirror the API of `Rc`.
TODO:
* [X] Tracking issue - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57977
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50158
