The test was meant to verify that the typechecker correctly
allows a _|_ value (break, here) to be used in any context.
However, the compiler fails with an LLVM assertion failure.
I xfailed it, but wanted it to be on the record anyway.
The typechecker had a number of special cases for unifying types
with _|_ (as with checking if and alt). But, a value of type _|_
should be usable in any context, as such a value always diverges,
and will never be used by its immediate context. Changed unify
accordingly, removed special cases.
Previously, if you wrote
let @vec[int] foo = @[];
that would be a type error. That didn't seem right, so I changed
pushdown to unify the inner type in an unop application with the
argument type of the operator type.
With the scheme used to translate 'else if' currently the if expression is
translated in a new (else) scope context. If that if expression wants to
result in a value that requires refcounting then it will need to drop the
refcount in the cleanups of the else block.
Blocks return in a copy of the result of their ending expression, not the
direct result of the ending expression, as that may be a local variable which
gets zeroed by drop_slot.
* Reorganized typestate into several modules.
* Made typestate check that any function with a non-nil return type
returns a value. For now, the check is a warning and not an error
(see next item).
* Added a "bot" type (prettyprinted as _|_), for constructs like be, ret, break, cont, and
fail that don't locally return a value that can be inspected. "bot"
is distinct from "nil". There is no concrete syntax for _|_, while
the concrete syntax for the nil type is ().
* Added support to the parser for a ! annotation on functions whose
result type is _|_. Such a function is required to have either a
fail or a call to another ! function that is reached in all control
flow paths. The point of this annotation is to mark functions like
unimpl() and span_err(), so that an alt with a call to err() in one
case isn't a false positive for the return-value checker. I haven't
actually annotated anything with it yet.
* Random bugfixes:
* * Fixed bug in trans::trans_binary that was throwing away the
cleanups for nested subexpressions of an and or or
(tests: box-inside-if and box-inside-if2).
** In typeck, unify the expected type arguments of a tag with the
actual specified arguments.