rustc_ast: Do not panic by default when visiting macro calls
Panicking by default made sense when we didn't have HIR or MIR and everything worked on AST, but now all AST visitors run early and majority of them have to deal with macro calls, often by ignoring them.
The second commit renames `visit_mac` to `visit_mac_call`, the corresponding structures were renamed earlier in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69589.
with an eye on merging `TargetOptions` into `Target`.
`TargetOptions` as a separate structure is mostly an implementation detail of `Target` construction, all its fields logically belong to `Target` and available from `Target` through `Deref` impls.
The main change is that `UnstableOptions::from_environment` now requires
an (optional) crate name. If the crate name is unknown (`None`), then the new feature is not available and you still have to use `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1`. In practice this means the feature is only available for `--crate-name`, not for `#![crate_name]`; I'm interested in supporting the second but I'm not sure how.
Other major changes:
- Added `Session::is_nightly_build()`, which uses the `crate_name` of
the session
- Added `nightly_options::match_is_nightly_build`, a convenience method
for looking up `--crate-name` from CLI arguments.
`Session::is_nightly_build()`should be preferred where possible, since
it will take into account `#![crate_name]` (I think).
- Added `unstable_features` to `rustdoc::RenderOptions`
There is a user-facing change here: things like `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=0` no
longer active nightly features. In practice this shouldn't be a big
deal, since `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP` is the opposite of stable and everyone
uses `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1` anyway.
- Add tests
Check against `Cheat`, not whether nightly features are allowed.
Nightly features are always allowed on the nightly channel.
- Only call `is_nightly_build()` once within a function
- Use booleans consistently for rustc_incremental
Sessions can't be passed through threads, so `read_file` couldn't take a
session. To be consistent, also take a boolean in `write_file_header`.
Improve errors about #[deprecated] attribute
This change:
1. Turns `#[deprecated]` on a trait impl block into an error, which fixes#78625;
2. Changes these and other errors about `#[deprecated]` to use the span of the attribute instead of the item; and
3. Turns this error into a lint, to make sure it can be capped with `--cap-lints` and doesn't break any existing dependencies.
Can be reviewed per commit.
---
Example:
```rust
struct X;
#[deprecated = "a"]
impl Default for X {
#[deprecated = "b"]
fn default() -> Self {
X
}
}
```
Before:
```
error: This deprecation annotation is useless
--> src/main.rs:6:5
|
6 | / fn default() -> Self {
7 | | X
8 | | }
| |_____^
```
After:
```
error: this `#[deprecated]' annotation has no effect
--> src/main.rs:3:1
|
3 | #[deprecated = "a"]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try removing the deprecation attribute
|
= note: `#[deny(useless_deprecated)]` on by default
error: this `#[deprecated]' annotation has no effect
--> src/main.rs:5:5
|
5 | #[deprecated = "b"]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try removing the deprecation attribute
```
replace `#[allow_internal_unstable]` with `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` for `const fn`s
`#[allow_internal_unstable]` is currently used to side-step feature gate and stability checks.
While it was originally only meant to be used only on macros, its use was expanded to `const fn`s.
This pr adds stricter checks for the usage of `#[allow_internal_unstable]` (only on macros) and introduces the `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` attribute for usage on `const fn`s.
This pr does not change any of the functionality associated with the use of `#[allow_internal_unstable]` on macros or the usage of `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` (instead of `#[allow_internal_unstable]`) on `const fn`s (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69399#issuecomment-712911540).
Note: The check for `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` currently only validates that the attribute is used on a function, because I don't know how I would check if the function is a `const fn` at the place of the check. I therefore openend this as a 'draft pull request'.
Closesrust-lang/rust#69399
r? @oli-obk
fix def collector for impl trait
fixes#77329
We now consistently make `impl Trait` a hir owner, requiring some special casing for synthetic generic params.
r? `@eddyb`
passes: `check_attr` on more targets
This PR modifies `check_attr` so that:
- Enum variants are now checked (some attributes would not have been prohibited on variants previously).
- `check_expr_attributes` and `check_stmt_attributes` are removed as `check_attributes` can perform the same checks. This means that codegen attribute errors aren't shown if there are other errors first (e.g. from other attributes, as shown in `src/test/ui/macros/issue-68060.rs` changes below).
The validation was introduced in 3a63bf0299
without strict validation of functions, e. g. all function types were
allowed.
Now the validation only allows `const fn`s.
Mark inout asm! operands as used in liveness pass
Variables used in `inout` operands in inline assembly (that is, they're used as both input and output to some arbitrary assembly instruction) are being marked as read and written, but are not marked as being used in the RWU table during the liveness pass. This can result in such expressions triggering an unused variable lint warning. This is incorrect behavior- reads without uses are currently only used for compound assignments. We conservatively assume that an `inout` operand is being read and used in the context of the assembly instruction.
Closes#77915
Preparation for a subsequent change that replaces
rustc_target::config::Config with its wrapped Target.
On its own, this commit breaks the build. I don't like making
build-breaking commits, but in this instance I believe that it
makes review easier, as the "real" changes of this PR can be
seen much more easily.
Result of running:
find compiler/ -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/target\.target\([)\.,; ]\)/target\1/g' {} \;
find compiler/ -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/target\.target$/target/g' {} \;
find compiler/ -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/target.ptr_width/target.pointer_width/g' {} \;
./x.py fmt
Implement Make `handle_alloc_error` default to panic (for no_std + liballoc)
Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66741
Guarded with `#![feature(default_alloc_error_handler)]` a default
`alloc_error_handler` is called, if a custom allocator is used and no
other custom `#[alloc_error_handler]` is defined.
Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66741
Guarded with `#![feature(default_alloc_error_handler)]` a default
`alloc_error_handler` is called, if a custom allocator is used and no
other custom `#[alloc_error_handler]` is defined.
The panic message does not contain the size anymore, because it would
pull in the fmt machinery, which would blow up the code size
significantly.
This commit modifies `check_attr` so that:
- Enum variants are now checked (some attributes would not have been
prohibited on variants previously).
- `check_expr_attributes` and `check_stmt_attributes` are removed as
`check_attributes` can perform the same checks.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Small improvements in liveness pass
* Remove redundant debug logging (`add_variable` already contains logging).
* Remove redundant fields for a number of live nodes and variables.
* Delay conversion from a symbol to a string until linting.
* Inline contents of specials struct.
* Remove unnecessary local variable exit_ln.
* Use newtype_index for Variable and LiveNode.
* Access live nodes directly through self.lnks[ln].
No functional changes intended (except those related to the logging).
Check for missing const-stability attributes in `rustc_passes`
Currently, this happens as a side effect of `is_min_const_fn`, which is non-obvious. Also adds a test for this case, since we didn't seem to have one before.
Validate built-in attribute placement
Closes#54584, closes#47725, closes#54044.
I've changed silently ignoring some incorrectly placed attributes to errors. I'm not sure what the policy is since this can theoretically break code (should they be warnings instead? does it warrant a crater run?).
