5664: Fix renamed self module. r=jonas-schievink a=Nashenas88
Fixes#5663
Now `inner_mod` below is properly marked as a `module`.
```rust
use crate::inner::{self as inner_mod};
mod inner {}
```
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <Nashenas88@users.noreply.github.com>
`current_dir` and relative paths to executables works differently on
unix and windows (unix behavior does not make sense), see:
17e30e83a1/src/lib.rs (L295-L324)
The original motivation to set cwd was to make rustfmt read the
correct rustfmt.toml, but that was future proofing, rather than a bug
fix.
So, let's just remove this and see if breaks or fixes more use-cases.
If support for per-file config is needed, we could use `--config-path`
flag.
5658: do not add to `pub use` in assists that insert a use statement r=jonas-schievink a=jbr
closes#5657 , see issue for rationale
Initially I wrote a version of this that changed the signature of `insert_use_statement` to take an `Option<VisibilityKind>` and only add to use statements with the same visibility, but that didn't make sense for any of the current uses of `insert_use_statement` (they all expected private visibility).
Co-authored-by: Jacob Rothstein <hi@jbr.me>
It's now consistent with other variables in that if the pattern
references self, only the `self` in scope where the rule is invoked will
be accepted. Since `self` doesn't work the same as other paths, this is
implemented by restricting the search to just the current function.
Prior to this change (since path resolution was implemented), having
self in a pattern would just result in no matches.
This fixes matching of things like `HashMap::default()` by resolving
`HashMap` instead of `default` (which resolves to `Default::default`).
Same for associated constants and types that are part of a trait
implementation.
However, we still don't support matching calls to trait methods.
Note that `for` type is rust-analyzer's own invention.
Both the reference and syn allow `for` only for fnptr types, and we
allow them everywhere. This needs to be checked with respect to type
bounds grammar...
The TypeRef name comes from IntelliJ days, where you often have both
type *syntax* as well as *semantical* representation of types in
scope. And naming both Type is confusing.
In rust-analyzer however, we use ast types as `ast::Type`, and have
many more semantic counterparts to ast types, so avoiding name clash
here is just confusing.
5596: Add checkOnSave.noDefaultFeatures and correct, how we handle some cargo flags. r=clemenswasser a=clemenswasser
This PR adds the `rust-analyzer.checkOnSave.noDefaultFeatures` option
and fixes the handling of `cargo.allFeatures`, `cargo.noDefaultFeatures` and `cargo.features`.
Fixes: #5550
Co-authored-by: Clemens Wasser <clemens.wasser@gmail.com>
This commit fixes the handling of user-defined configuration
of some cargo options. Previously you could either specify
`--all-features`, `--no-default-features` or `--features`.
Now you can specify either `--all-features` or `--no-default-features`
and `--features`. This commit also corrects the `--features`
command-line argument creation inside of `load_extern_resources`.
5567: SSR: Wrap placeholder expansions in parenthesis when necessary r=matklad a=davidlattimore
e.g. `foo($a) ==> $a.to_string()` should produce `(1 + 2).to_string()` not `1 + 2.to_string()`
We don't yet try to determine if the whole replacement needs to be wrapped in parenthesis. That's harder and I think perhaps less often an issue.
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
e.g. `foo($a) ==> $a.to_string()` should produce `(1 + 2).to_string()`
not `1 + 2.to_string()`
We don't yet try to determine if the whole replacement needs to be
wrapped in parenthesis. That's harder and I think perhaps less often an
issue.
5554: Fix remove_dbg r=matklad a=petr-tik
Closes#5129
Addresses two issues:
- keep the parens from dbg!() in case the call is chained or there is
semantic difference if parens are excluded
- Exclude the semicolon after the dbg!(); by checking if it was
accidentally included in the macro_call
investigated, but decided against:
fix ast::MacroCall extraction to never include semicolons at the end -
this logic lives in rowan.
Defensively shorten the macro_range if there is a semicolon token.
Deleted unneccessary temp variable macro_args
Renamed macro_content to "paste_instead_of_dbg", because it isn't a
simple extraction of text inside dbg!() anymore
Co-authored-by: petr-tik <petr-tik@users.noreply.github.com>
5563: Check all targets for package-level tasks r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
When invoking "Select Runnable" with the caret on a runnable with a specific target (test, bench, binary), append the corresponding argument for the `cargo check -p` module runnable.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
replaced match with let-if variable assignment
removed the unnecessary semicolon_on_end variable
converted all code and expected test variables to raw strings
and inlined them in asserts
The primary advantage of ungrammar is that it (eventually) allows one
to describe concrete syntax tree structure -- with alternatives and
specific sequence of tokens & nodes.
That should be re-usable for:
* generate `make` calls
* Rust reference
* Hypothetical parser's evented API
We loose doc comments for the time being unfortunately. I don't think
we should add support for doc comments to ungrammar -- they'll make
grammar file hard to read. We might supply docs as out-of band info,
or maybe just via a reference, but we'll think about that once things
are no longer in flux
5564: SSR: Restrict to current selection if any r=davidlattimore a=davidlattimore
The selection is also used to avoid unnecessary work, but only to the file level. Further restricting unnecessary work is left for later.
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
5565: SSR: Don't mix non-path-based rules with path-based r=matklad a=davidlattimore
If any rules contain paths, then we reject any rules that don't contain paths. Allowing a mix leads to strange semantics, since the path-based rules only match things where the path refers to semantically the same thing, whereas the non-path-based rules could match anything. Specifically, if we have a rule like `foo ==>> bar` we only want to match the `foo` that is in the current scope, not any `foo`. However "foo" can be parsed as a pattern (BIND_PAT -> NAME -> IDENT). Allowing such a rule through would result in renaming everything called `foo` to `bar`. It'd also be slow, since without a path, we'd have to use the slow-scan search mechanism.
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
If any rules contain paths, then we reject any rules that don't contain paths. Allowing a mix leads to strange semantics, since the path-based rules only match things where the path refers to semantically the same thing, whereas the non-path-based rules could match anything. Specifically, if we have a rule like `foo ==>> bar` we only want to match the `foo` that is in the current scope, not any `foo`. However "foo" can be parsed as a pattern (BIND_PAT -> NAME -> IDENT). Allowing such a rule through would result in renaming everything called `foo` to `bar`. It'd also be slow, since without a path, we'd have to use the slow-scan search mechanism.
