This pull request changes the representation of identifiers by adding an integer to the side of each one. This integer will eventually be a reference to a side-table of syntax contexts, presumably stored in TLS. This pull request also adds a bunch of utility functions required for hygiene, and associated tests, but doesn't actually deploy those functions.
Finally, it also has a number of small cleanup items.
r? @nikomatsakis
This doesn't completely fix the x86 ABI for structs, but it does fix some cases. On linux, structs appear to be returned correctly now. On windows, structs are only returned by pointer when they are greater than 8 bytes. That scenario works now.
In the case where the struct is less than 8 bytes our generated code looks peculiar. When returning a pair of u16, C packs both variables into %eax to return them. Our generated code though expects to find one of the pair in %ax and the other in %dx. Similar for u8. I haven't looked into it yet.
There appears to also be struct passing problems on linux, where my `extern-pass-TwoU8s` and `extern-pass-TwoU16s` tests are failing.
This Adds a bunch of tests for passing and returning structs
of various sizes to C. It fixes the struct return rules on unix,
and on windows for structs of size > 8 bytes. Struct passing
on unix for structs under a certain size appears to still be broken.
This will help not to meet confusing errors.
In issue #5873, the error was "expected constant expr for vector length: Can't cast str to int".
It was originally "expected constant expr for vector length: Non-constant path in constant expr" (though still invalid error).
This patch make the original error to be printed.
This patch is a sledge hammer that moves all tests into `#[cfg(test)] mod test { .. }`, and makes them private, there were several instances of `pub mod tests { #[test] pub fn ... } `.
(The reason for this is I was playing with using `syntax` to index code ([result so far](http://www.ug.it.usyd.edu.au/~hwil7821/rust-api/)) and it was getting some junk from the tests.)
The rustdoc commit is particularly brutal, so it's fine if that one isn't landed.
This adds examples for the methods in std::base64.
Each example is complete in the sense that you can copy-paste it into a file and compile it successfully without adding anything (imports, etc). The hardest part of figuring out how to use this was figuring out the right import statements to put at the top.
r? @graydon
Pulled out tests into their own modules inside the files they test,
as per the draft style guidelines.
Started a new module, path_util, for utility functions to do with
paths and directories.
Changed default_dest_dir to use a condition and return Path
instead of Option<Path>.
Closes#5487, #1913, and #4568
I tracked this by adding all used unsafe blocks/functions to a set on the `tcx` passed around, and then when the lint pass comes around if an unsafe block/function isn't listed in that set, it's unused.
I also removed everything from the compiler that was unused, and up to stage2 is now compiling without any known unused unsafe blocks.
I chose `unused_unsafe` as the name of the lint attribute, but there may be a better name...
This will help not to meet confusing errors.
In issue #5873, the error was "expected constant expr for vector length: Can't cast str to int".
It was originally "expected constant expr for vector length: Non-constant path in constant expr"
This patch make the original error to be printed.
This takes care of one of the last remnants of assumptions about enum layout. A type visitor is now passed a function to read a value's discriminant, then accesses fields by being passed a byte offset for each one. The latter may not be fully general, despite the constraints imposed on representations by borrowed pointers, but works for any representations currently planned and is relatively simple.
Closes#5652.
Update an old test to pass. I'm not 100% sure what the intent of the test was, but it's hard to see how I could have corrupted the intent of the test from the tiny changes I made.
This is a follow-up to #5761. Its purpose is to make core::libc more consistent - it currently only defines SIGKILL and SIGTERM, because they are the only values that happen to be needed by libcore.
This adds all the posix signal value constants, except for those that have different values on different architectures.
The output of the command `man 7 signal` was used to compile these signal values.
value constants, except for those that have different values
on different architectures.
The output of the command `man 7 signal` was used to
compile these signal values.
