3499: Resolve `Self::AssocTy` in impls r=matklad a=flodiebold
To do this we need to carry around the original resolution a bit, because `Self`
gets resolved to the actual type immediately, but you're not allowed to write
the equivalent type in a projection. (I tried just comparing the projection base
type with the impl self type, but that seemed too dirty.) This is basically how
rustc does it as well.
Fixes#3249.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <florian.diebold@freiheit.com>
To do this we need to carry around the original resolution a bit, because `Self`
gets resolved to the actual type immediately, but you're not allowed to write
the equivalent type in a projection. (I tried just comparing the projection base
type with the impl self type, but that seemed too dirty.) This is basically how
rustc does it as well.
Fixes#3249.
3494: Implement include macro r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR implement builtin `include` macro.
* It does not support include as expression yet.
* It doesn't consider `env!("OUT_DIR")` yet.
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3487: Rerail split_import API onto AST r=matklad a=matklad
The code is more verbose and less efficient now, but should be
reusable in add_import context as well
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
3483: Unfold groups with single assists into plain assists r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
A follow-up of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/3120/files#r378788698 , made to show more detailed label when the assist group contains a single element
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
3482: Fix regression from #3451 r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
There is a regression from #3451 such that the following code has failed to parse in raw item collecting phase:
```rust
macro_rules! with_std {
($($i:item)*) => ($(#[cfg(feature = "std")]$i)*)
}
with_std! {
mod macros;
mod others;
}
```
### Rationale
We always assume the last token of an statement will not end with a whitespace, which is true. It is because in parsing phase, we always emit `SyntaxNode` before any whitespace. Such that in various parts of RA code, we solely check the semi-colon by using `SyntaxNode::last_child_token() == ";"` .
However, in #3451, we insert some whitespaces between puncts such that we broke above assumption. This PR fixed this bug by make sure we don't add any whitespace if it is a semicolon.
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
