rename Generator to Coroutine
implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/682
While I did an automated replacement, I went through all changes manually to avoid renaming things like "id generators", "code generator", ...
I renamed files where that was necessary due to the contents referring to the crate name itself (mir opt, codegen or debuginfo tests), or required by tidy (feature gate docs)
* [x] rename various remaining abbreviated references to generators.
* [x] rename files
* [x] rename folders
* [x] add renamed feature: `generators`, ...
r? `@ghost`
Restructure `rustc_type_ir` a bit
1. Split `sty` into new `ty_kind`/`region_kind`/`const_kind` modules, so that when we uplift more kinds (e.g. `PredicateKind`, `ClauseKind`, and `ExistentialPredicate`), they can live in their own simple-to-understand files.
2. Split up the `structural_impls` module, which is a kitchen sink of random impls -- move `TypeFoldable` and `TypeVisitable` impls into existing `fold` and `visit` modules, respectively.
3. Move the `DebugWithInfcx` trait and blanket impls into a new `debug` module, and `TypeFlags` definition into a new `flags` module.
5. Move `Interner` trait into a new `interner` module. I expect this file to get a lot larger as we make the interner more powerful for the trait solver refactor.
r? `@ghost` for now, will assign once #116946 lands
Move where doc comment meant as comment check
The new place makes more sense and covers more cases beyond individual statements.
```
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator, found doc comment `//!foo
--> $DIR/doc-comment-in-stmt.rs:25:22
|
LL | let y = x.max(1) //!foo
| ^^^^^^ expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator
|
help: add a space before `!` to write a regular comment
|
LL | let y = x.max(1) // !foo
| +
```
Fix#65329.
Uplift movability and mutability, the simple way
Just make type_ir a dependency of ast. This can be relaxed later if we want to make the dependency less heavy. Part of rust-lang/types-team#124.
r? `@lcnr` or `@jackh726`
Add a test showing failing closure signature inference in new solver
Been thinking a bit about how to make this test pass... but we don't actually have any good tests exercising this behavior in the suite.
r? lcnr
Specialize `Bytes<R>::next` when `R` is a `BufReader`.
This reduces the runtime for a simple program using `Bytes::next` to iterate through a file from 220ms to 70ms on my Linux box.
r? `@the8472`
The new place makes more sense and covers more cases beyond individual
statements.
```
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator, found doc comment `//!foo
--> $DIR/doc-comment-in-stmt.rs:25:22
|
LL | let y = x.max(1) //!foo
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator
|
help: add a space before `!` to write a regular comment
|
LL | let y = x.max(1) // !foo
| +
```
Fix#65329.
Fix duplicate labels emitted in `render_multispan_macro_backtrace()`
This PR replaces the `Vec` used to store labels with an `FxIndexSet` in order to eliminate duplicates
Fixes#116836
Implement rustc part of RFC 3127 trim-paths
This PR implements (or at least tries to) [RFC 3127 trim-paths](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111540), the rustc part. That is `-Zremap-path-scope` with all of it's components/scopes.
`@rustbot` label: +F-trim-paths
Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt tests.
This PR makes compiletest run LLVM `FileCheck` tool on mir-opt tests.
The check is *run by default*, except if disabled using `// skip-filecheck` comment. This ensures that we do not have a silently broken test. For now, the check is only run on the output of `--emit=mir`, ie. on PreCodegen MIR.
I give an example on `reference_prop.rs`.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@RalfJung`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85180
