Allow to run only a few GUI tests
It allows to specify only one (or more) GUI tests. Considering the tests are not super fast to run, this is very useful for development.
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum`
r? `@jsha`
rustdoc- dont ICE on `ConstEvaluatable` predicates
Fixes#77647
rustdoc doesn't need to be handling these as you cant write them, they just get added implicitly when you write a where clause containing an expression.
Updates `Clone` docs for `Copy` comparison.
Quite a few people (myself included) have come under the impression that the difference between `Copy` and `Clone` is that `Copy` is cheap and `Clone` is expensive, where the actual difference is that `Copy` constrains the type to bit-wise copying, and `Clone` allows for more expensive operations. The source of this misconception is in the `Clone` docs, where the following line is in the description:
> Differs from `Copy` in that `Copy` is implicit and extremely inexpensive, while `Clone` is always explicit and may or may not be expensive.
The `Clone` documentation page also comes up before the `Copy` page on google when searching for "the difference between `Clone` and `Copy`".
This PR updates the documentation to clarify that "extremely inexpensive" means an "inexpensive bit-wise copy" to hopefully prevent future rust users from falling into this misunderstanding.
Avoid possible filename collision in coverage tests
Previously, coverage tests were writing profiler data to files based on
their pid. As rustdoc spawns each doctest as its own process, it might
be possible in rare cases that a pid is being reused which would cause
a file to be overwritten, leading to incorrect coverage results.
should help with #83262
r? `@tmandry`
Remove `Ipv6Addr::is_unicast_site_local`
Removes the unstable method `Ipv6Addr::is_unicast_site_local`, see also #85604 where I have tried to summarize related discussion so far.
Unicast site-local addresses (`fec0::/10`) were deprecated in [IETF RFC #3879](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3879), see also [RFC #4291 Section 2.5.7](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4291#section-2.5.7). Any new implementation must no longer support the special behaviour of site-local addresses. This is mentioned in the docs of `is_unicast_site_local` and already implemented in `is_unicast_global`, which considers addresses in `fec0::/10` to have global scope, thus overlapping with `is_unicast_site_local`.
Given that RFC #3879 was published in 2004, long before Rust existed, and it is specified that any new implementation must no longer support the special behaviour of site-local addresses, I don't see how a user would ever have a need for `is_unicast_site_local`. It is also confusing that currently both `is_unicast_site_local` and `is_unicast_global` can be `true` for an address, but an address can actually only have a single scope. The deprecating RFC mentions that Site-Local scope was confusing to work with and that the classification of an address as either Link-Local or Global better matches the mental model of users.
There has been earlier discussion of removing `is_unicast_site_local` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60145#issuecomment-485970669) which decided against it, but that had the incorrect assumption that the method was already stable; it is not. (This confusion arose from the placement of the unstable attribute on the entire module, instead of on individual methods, resolved in #85672)
r? `@joshtriplett` as reviewer of all the related PRs
Integrate binary search codes of binary_search_by and partition_point
For now partition_point has own binary search code piece.
It is because binary_search_by had called the comparer more times and the author (=me) wanted to avoid it.
However, now binary_search_by uses the comparer minimum times. (#74024)
So it's time to integrate them.
The appearance of the codes are a bit different but both use completely same logic.
Stabilize {std, core}::prelude::rust_*.
This stabilizes the `{core, std}::prelude::{rust_2015, rust_2018, rust_2021}` modules.
The usage of these modules as the prelude in those editions was already stabilized. This just stabilizes the modules themselves, making it possible for a user to explicitly refer to them.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85684
FCP on the RFC that included this finished here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3114#issuecomment-840577395
Remove must_use from ALLOWED_ATTRIBUTES
This is a fairly common attribute on methods, but is not something you need to know when reading the method docs - the purpose of the attribute is for the compiler to tell you about it if you forget to use a value.
Removing reclaims some valuable space in the summary of methods, particularly when the attribute has a long string value.
As discussed in #84309. Partially addresses #81482.
r? ```@Manishearth```
Add functions `Duration::try_from_secs_{f32, f64}`
These functions allow constructing a Duration from a floating point value that could be out of range without panicking.
Tracking issue: #83400
Explain non-dropped sender recv in docs
Original senders that are still hanging around could cause
Receiver::recv to not block since this is a potential footgun
for beginners, clarify more on this in the docs for readers to
be aware about it.
Maybe it would be better to show an example of the pattern where `drop(tx)` is used when it is being cloned multiple times? Although I have seen it in quite a few articles but I am surprised that this part is not very clear with the current words without careful reading.
> If the corresponding Sender has disconnected, or it disconnects while this call is blocking, this call will wake up and return Err to indicate that no more messages can ever be received on this channel. However, since channels are buffered, messages sent before the disconnect will still be properly received.
Some words there may seemed similar if I carefully read and relate it but if I am new, I probably does not know "drop" makes it "disconnected". So I mention the words "drop" and "alive" to make it more relatable to lifetime.
rustdoc: revert deref recur to resume inclusion of impl ExtTrait<Local> for ExtType
As discussed here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82465#issuecomment-829290384, Revert PR #80653 to resolve issue #82465.
Issue #82465 was we had stopped including certain trait implementations, namely implementations on an imported type of an imported trait *instantiated on a local type*. That bug was injected by PR #80653.
Reverting #80653 means we don't list all the methods that you have accessible via recursively applying `Deref`.
[Discussion in last week's rustc triage meeting](https://zulip-archive.rust-lang.org/238009tcompilermeetings/19557weekly2021042954818.html#236680594) led us to conclude that the bug was worse than the enhancement, and there was not an obvious fix for the bug itself. So for the short term we remove the enhancement, while in the long term we will work on figuring out a way to have our imported trait implementation cake and eat it too.
Improve CTFE UB validation error messages
As mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86245#discussion_r650494012 this PR slightly improves the formatting of validation errors, to move the path to the error prefix.
From:
`type validation failed: encountered invalid vtable: size is bigger than largest supported object at .0`
To:
`type validation failed at .0: encountered invalid vtable: size is bigger than largest supported object`.
Previously, coverage tests were writing profiler data to files based on
their pid. As rustdoc spawns each doctest as its own process, it might
be possible in rare cases that a pid is being reused which would cause
a file to be overwritten, leading to incorrect coverage results.
Fix force-warns to allow dashes.
The `--force-warns` flag was not allowing lint names with dashes, only supporting underscores. This changes it to allow dashes to match the behavior of the A/W/D/F flags.
Revert #85176 addition of `clone_from` for `ManuallyDrop`
Forwarding `clone_from` to the inner value changes the observable behavior, as previously the inner value would *not* be dropped by the default implementation.
Frankly, this is a super-niche case, so #85176 is welcome to argue the behavior should be otherwise! But if we overrride it, IMO documenting the behavior would be good.
Example: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=c5d0856686fa850c1d7ee16891014efb
This is a fairly common attribute on methods, but is not something you
need to know when reading the method docs - the purpose of the attribute
is for the compiler to tell you about it if you forget to use a value.
Removing reclaims some valuable space in the summary of methods.
