It improves the performance of iterators using unchecked access when building in incremental mode
(due to the larger CGU count?). It might negatively affect incremental compile times for better runtime results,
but considering that the equivalent `next()` implementations also are `#[inline]` and usually are more complex this
should be ok.
```
./x.py bench library/core -i --stage 0 --test-args bench_trusted_random_access
OLD: 119,172 ns/iter
NEW: 17,714 ns/iter
```
Tweak the vec-calloc runtime check to only apply to shortish-arrays
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
`@nbdd0121` pointed out in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95362#issuecomment-1114085395 that LLVM currently doesn't constant-fold the `IsZero` check for long arrays, so that seems like a reasonable justification for limiting it.
It appears that it's based on length, not byte size, (https://godbolt.org/z/4s48Y81dP), so that's what I used in the PR. Maybe it's a ["the number of inlining shall be three"](https://youtu.be/s4wnuiCwTGU?t=320) sort of situation.
Certainly there's more that could be done here -- that generated code that checks long arrays byte-by-byte is highly suboptimal, for example -- but this is an easy, low-risk tweak.
std::fmt: Various fixes and improvements to documentation
This PR contains the following changes:
- **Added argument index comments to examples for specifying precision**
The examples for specifying the precision have comments explaining which
argument the specifier is referring to. However, for implicit positional
arguments, the examples simply refer to "next arg". To simplify following the
comments, "next arg" was supplemented with the actual resulting argument index.
- **Fixed documentation for specifying precision via `.*`**
The documentation stated that in case of the syntax `{<arg>:<spec>.*}`, "the
`<arg>` part refers to the value to print, and the precision must come in the
input preceding `<arg>`". This is not correct: the <arg> part does indeed refer
to the value to print, but the precision does not come in the input preciding
arg, but in the next implicit input (as if specified with {}).
Fixes#96413.
- **Fix the grammar documentation**
According to the grammar documented, the format specifier `{: }` should not be
legal because of the whitespace it contains. However, in reality, this is
perfectly fine because the actual implementation allows spaces before the
closing brace. Fixes#71088.
Also, the exact meaning of most of the terminal symbols was not specified, for
example the meaning of `identifier`.
- **Removed reference to Formatter::buf and other private fields**
Formatter::buf is not a public field and therefore isn't very helpful in user-
facing documentation. Also, the other public fields of Formatter were removed
during stabilization of std::fmt (4af3494bb0) and can only be accessed via
getters.
- **Improved list of formatting macros**
Two improvements:
1. write! can not only receive a `io::Write`, but also a `fmt::Write` as first argument.
2. The description texts now contain links to the actual macros for easier
navigation.
Clarify docs for `from_raw_parts` on `Vec` and `String`
Closes#95427
Original safety explanation for `from_raw_parts` was unclear on safety for consuming a C string. This clarifies when doing so is safe.
Classify BinaryHeap & LinkedList unit tests as such
All but one of these so-called integration test case are unit tests, just like btree's were (#75531). In addition, reunite the unit tests of linked_list that were split off during #23104 because they needed to remain unit tests (they were later moved to the separate file they are in during #63207). The two sets could remain separate files, but I opted to merge them back together, more or less in the order they used to be, apart from one duplicate name `test_split_off` and one duplicate tiny function `list_from`.
`SameMutexCheck` only requires atomicity for `self.addr`, but does not need ordering of other memory accesses in either the success or failure case. Using `Relaxed`, the code still correctly handles the case when two threads race to store an address.
`min_stack` does not provide any synchronization guarantees to its callers, and only requires atomicity for `MIN` itself, so relaxed memory ordering is sufficient.
rustdoc: Resolve doc links referring to `macro_rules` items
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81633
UPD: the fallback to considering *all* `macro_rules` in the crate for unresolved names is not removed in this PR, it will be removed separately and will be run through crater.
Two improvements:
1. write! can not only receive a `io::Write`, but also a `fmt::Write` as first argument.
2. The description texts now contain links to the actual macros for easier
navigation.
Formatter::buf is not a public field and therefore isn't very helpful in user-
facing documentation. Also, the other public fields of Formatter were made
private during stabilization of std::fmt (4af3494bb0) and can now only be read
via accessor methods.
According to the grammar documented, the format specifier `{: }` should not be
legal because of the whitespace it contains. However, in reality, this is
perfectly fine because the actual implementation allows spaces before the
closing brace. Fixes#71088.
Also, the exact meaning of most of the terminal symbols was not specified, for
example the meaning of `identifier`.
The examples for specifying the precision have comments explaining which
argument the specifier is referring to. However, for implicit positional
arguments, the examples simply talk about "next arg". To make it easier for
readers to follow the comments, "next arg" was supplemented with the actual
resulting argument index.
The documentation stated that in case of the syntax `{<arg>:<spec>.*}`, "the
`<arg>` part refers to the value to print, and the precision must come in the
input preceding `<arg>`". This is not correct: the <arg> part does indeed refer
to the value to print, but the precision does not come in the input preciding
arg, but in the next implicit input (as if specified with {}).
Fixes#96413.
Implement str to [u8] conversion for refcounted containers
This seems motivated to complete the APIs for shared containers since we already have similar allocation-free conversions for strings like `From<Box<[u8]>> for Box<str>`.
Insta-stable since it's a new trait impl?
Make [e]println macros eagerly drop temporaries (for backport)
This PR extracts the subset of #96455 which is only the parts necessary for fixing the 1.61-beta regressions in #96434.
My larger PR #96455 contains a few other changes relative to the pre-#94868 behavior; those are not necessary to backport into 1.61.
argument position | before #94868 | after #94868 | after this PR
--- |:---:|:---:|:---:
`write!($tmp, "…", …)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`write!(…, "…", $tmp)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`writeln!($tmp, "…", …)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`writeln!(…, "…", $tmp)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`print!("…", $tmp)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`println!("…", $tmp)` | 😺 | 😡 | 😺
`eprint!("…", $tmp)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`eprintln!("…", $tmp)` | 😺 | 😡 | 😺
`panic!("…", $tmp)` | 😺 | 😺 | 😺
Using an obviously-placeholder syntax. An RFC would still be needed before this could have any chance at stabilization, and it might be removed at any point.
But I'd really like to have it in nightly at least to ensure it works well with try_trait_v2, especially as we refactor the traits.
Revert "Re-export core::ffi types from std::ffi"
This reverts commit 9aed829fe6.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96435 , a regression
in crates doing `use std::ffi::*;` and `use std::os::raw::*;`.
We can re-add this re-export once the `core::ffi` types
are stable, and thus the `std::os::raw` types can become re-exports as
well, which will avoid the conflict. (Type aliases to the same type
still conflict, but re-exports of the same type don't.)
Windows: Make stdin pipes synchronous
Stdin pipes do not need to be used asynchronously within the standard library. This is a first step in making pipes mostly synchronous.
r? `@m-ou-se`
std: directly use pthread in UNIX parker implementation
`Mutex` and `Condvar` are being replaced by more efficient implementations, which need thread parking themselves (see #93740). Therefore we should use the `pthread` synchronization primitives directly. Also, we can avoid allocating the mutex and condition variable because the `Parker` struct is being placed in an `Arc` anyways.
This basically is just a copy of the current `Mutex` and `Condvar` code, which will however be removed (again, see #93740). An alternative implementation could be to use dedicated private `OsMutex` and `OsCondvar` types, but all the other platforms supported by std actually have their own thread parking primitives.
I used `Pin` to guarantee a stable address for the `Parker` struct, while the current implementation does not, rather using extra unsafe declaration. Since the thread struct is shared anyways, I assumed this would not add too much clutter while being clearer.
rustc_ast: Harmonize delimiter naming with `proc_macro::Delimiter`
Compiler cannot reuse `proc_macro::Delimiter` directly due to extra impls, but can at least use the same naming.
After this PR the only difference between these two enums is that `proc_macro::Delimiter::None` is turned into `token::Delimiter::Invisible`.
It's my mistake that the invisible delimiter is called `None` on stable, during the stabilization I audited the naming and wrote the docs, but missed the fact that the `None` naming gives a wrong and confusing impression about what this thing is.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96421
r? ``@nnethercote``
Add VecDeque::extend from vec::IntoIter and slice::Iter specializations
Inspired from the [`Vec` `SpecExtend` implementation](027a232755/library/alloc/src/vec/spec_extend.rs), but without the specialization for `TrustedLen` which I'll look into in the future.
Should help #95632 and https://github.com/KillingSpark/zstd-rs/pull/17
## Benchmarks
Before
```
test vec_deque::bench_extend_bytes ... bench: 862 ns/iter (+/- 10)
test vec_deque::bench_extend_vec ... bench: 883 ns/iter (+/- 19)
```
After
```
test vec_deque::bench_extend_bytes ... bench: 8 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test vec_deque::bench_extend_vec ... bench: 24 ns/iter (+/- 1)
```
Make EncodeWide implement FusedIterator
[`EncodeUtf16`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/str/struct.EncodeUtf16.html) and [`EncodeWide`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/os/windows/ffi/struct.EncodeWide.html) currently serve similar purposes: They convert from UTF-8 to UTF-16 and WTF-8 to WTF-16, respectively. `EncodeUtf16` wraps a &str, whereas `EncodeWide` wraps an &OsStr.
When Iteration has concluded, these iterators wrap an empty slice, which will forever yield `None` values. Hence, `EncodeUtf16` rightfully implements `FusedIterator`. However, `EncodeWide` in contrast does not, even though it serves an almost identical purpose.
This PR attempts to fix that issue. I consider this change minor and non-controversial, hence why I have not added a RFC/FCP. Please let me know if the stability attribute is wrong or contains a wrong version number. Thanks in advance.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96368
This reverts commit 9aed829fe6.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96435 , a regression
in crates doing `use std::ffi::*;` and `use std::os::raw::*;`.
We can re-add this re-export once the `core::ffi` types
are stable, and thus the `std::os::raw` types can become re-exports as
well, which will avoid the conflict. (Type aliases to the same type
still conflict, but re-exports of the same type don't.)
Define a dedicated error type for `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid`.
Define `NullHandleError` and `InvalidHandleError` types, that implement std::error::Error, and use them as the error types in `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid`,
This addresses [this concern](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87074#issuecomment-1080031167).
This is the same as #95387.
r? `@joshtriplett`
Clarify that `Cow::into_owned` returns owned data
Two sections of the `Cow::into_owned` docs imply that `into_owned` returns a `Cow`. Clarify that it returns the underlying owned object, either cloned or extracted from the `Cow`.
Fix some confusing wording and improve slice-search-related docs
This adds more links between `contains` and `binary_search` because I do think they have some relevant connections. If your (big) slice happens to be sorted and you know it, surely you should be using `[3; 100].binary_search(&5).is_ok()` over `[3; 100].contains(&5)`?
This also fixes the confusing "searches this sorted X" wording which just sounds really weird because it doesn't know whether it's actually sorted. It should be but it may not be. The new wording should make it clearer that you will probably want to sort it and in the same sentence it also mentions the related function `contains`.
Similarly, this mentions `binary_search` on `contains`' docs.
This also fixes some other minor stuff and inconsistencies.
Mutex and Condvar are being replaced by more efficient implementations, which need thread parking themselves (see #93740). Therefore use the pthread synchronization primitives directly. Also, avoid allocating because the Parker struct is being placed in an Arc anyways.
Windows Command: Don't run batch files using verbatim paths
Fixes#95178
Note that the first commit does some minor refactoring (moving command line argument building to args.rs). The actual changes are in the second.
[test] Add test cases for untested functions for VecDeque
Added test cases of the following functions
- get
- get_mut
- swap
- reserve_exact
- try_reserve_exact
- try_reserve
- contains
- rotate_left
- rotate_right
- binary_search
- binary_search_by
- binary_search_by_key
Unstably constify `impl<I: Iterator> IntoIterator for I`
This constifies the default `IntoIterator` implementation under the `const_intoiterator_identity` feature.
Tracking Issue: #90603
No "weird" floats in const fn {from,to}_bits
I suspect this code is subtly incorrect and that we don't even e.g. use x87-style floats in CTFE, so I don't have to guard against that case. A future PR will be hopefully removing them from concern entirely, anyways. But at the moment I wanted to get this rolling because small questions like that one seem best answered by review.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@eddyb` `@thomcc`
Reduce allocations for path conversions on Windows
Previously, UTF-8 to UTF-16 Path conversions on Windows unnecessarily allocate twice, as described in #96297. This commit fixes that issue.
Improve Windows path prefix parsing
This PR fixes improves parsing of Windows path prefixes. `parse_prefix` now supports both types of separators on Windows (`/` and `\`).
Fixes: aa67016624 ("make memcmp return a value of c_int_width instead of i32")
Introduce c_num_definition to getting the cfg_if logic easier to maintain
Add newlines for easier code reading
Signed-off-by: Yonggang Luo <luoyonggang@gmail.com>
[fuchsia] Add implementation for `current_exe`
This implementation returns a best attempt at the current exe path. On
fuchsia, fdio will always use `argv[0]` as the process name and if it is
not set then an error will be returned. Because this is not guaranteed
to be the case, this implementation returns an error if `argv` does not
contain any elements.
remove_dir_all_recursive: treat ELOOP the same as ENOTDIR
On older Linux kernels (I tested on 4.4, corresponding to Ubuntu 16.04), opening a symlink using `O_DIRECTORY | O_NOFOLLOW` returns `ELOOP` instead of `ENOTDIR`. We should handle it the same, since a symlink is still not a directory and needs to be `unlink`ed.
Use sys::unix::locks::futex* on wasm+atomics.
This removes the wasm-specific lock implementations and instead re-uses the implementations from sys::unix.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93740
cc ``@alexcrichton``
Improve AddrParseError description
The existing description was incorrect for socket addresses, and misleading: users would see “invalid IP address syntax” and suppose they were supposed to provide an IP address rather than a socket address.
I contemplated making it two variants (IP, socket), but realised we can do still better for the IPv4 and IPv6 types, so here it is as six.
I contemplated more precise error descriptions (e.g. “invalid IPv6 socket address syntax: expected a decimal scope ID after %”), but that’s a more invasive change, and probably not worthwhile anyway.
