Wrapping intrinsics doc links update.
The links in the wrapping intrinsics docs now refer to the `wrapping_*` functions, not the `checked_*` functions.
Since having enabled the download-ci-llvm option,
and having rebased on top of f05b47ccdf,
I've noticed that I had to update the llvm-project
submodule manually if it was checked out.
Orignally, the submodule update logic was
introduced to reduce the friction for contributors
to manage the submodules, or in other words, to prevent
getting PRs that have unwanted submodule rollbacks
because the contributors didn't run git submodule update.
This commit adds logic to ensure there is no inadvertent
LLVM submodule rollback in a PR if download-ci-llvm
(or llvm-config) is enabled. It will detect whether the
llvm-project submodule is initialized, and if so, update
it in any case. If it is not initialized, behaviour is
kept to not do any update/initialization.
An alternative to the chosen implementation would
be to not pass the --init command line arg to
`git submodule update` for the src/llvm-project
submodule. This would show a confusing error message
however on all builds with an uninitialized repo.
We could pass the --silent param, but we still want
it to print something if it is initialized and has
to update something.
So we just do a manual check for whether the
submodule is initialized.
Disable MatchBranchSimplification
This optimization can result in unsoundness, because it introduces
additional uses of a place holding the discriminant value without
ensuring that it is valid to do so.
Found by validation from #77369 / #78147.
Add more infomation about LintStore registration
Backstory: I somehow missed the fact that I needed to register a lint pass in order for it to run, and I spent some time confused until I figured it out. So I wanted to make it clear that a missing `register_(early|late)_pass` call is a likely cause of a lint not running.
changelog: none
Improve `skip_binder` usage during FlagComputation
It looks like there was previously a bug around `ExistentialPredicate::Projection` here, don't know how to best trigger that one to add a regression test though.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #77612 (BTreeMap: test invariants more thoroughly and more readably)
- #77761 (Assert that pthread mutex initialization succeeded)
- #77778 ([x.py setup] Allow setting up git hooks from other worktrees)
- #77838 (const keyword: brief paragraph on 'const fn')
- #77923 ([net] apply clippy lints)
- #77931 (Fix false positive for `unused_parens` lint)
- #77959 (Tweak ui-tests structure)
- #78105 (change name in .mailmap)
- #78111 (Trait predicate ambiguities are not always in `Self`)
- #78121 (Do not ICE on pattern that uses a binding multiple times in generator)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
Trait predicate ambiguities are not always in `Self`
When reporting ambiguities in trait predicates, the compiler incorrectly assumed the ambiguity was always in the type the trait should be implemented on, and never the generic parameters of the trait. This caused silly suggestions for predicates like `<KnownType as Trait<_>>`, such as giving explicit types to completely unrelated variables that happened to be of type `KnownType`.
This also reverts #73027, which worked around this issue in some cases and does not appear to be necessary any more.
fixes#77982fixes#78055
Tweak ui-tests structure
We have some similar name dirs in ui tests, e.g. `associated-type` and `associated-types` and it can be an issue when we add a test, "which is the right place?". At a glance, it seems they can be merged into one directory so let's merge them to avoid some confusion :)
const keyword: brief paragraph on 'const fn'
`const fn` were mentioned in the title, but called "deterministic functions" which is not their main property (though at least currently it is a consequence of being const-evaluable). This adds a brief paragraph discussing them, also in the hopes of clarifying that they do *not* have any effect on run-time uses.
Assert that pthread mutex initialization succeeded
If pthread mutex initialization fails, the failure will go unnoticed unless
debug assertions are enabled. Any subsequent use of mutex will also silently
fail, since return values from lock & unlock operations are similarly checked
only through debug assertions.
In some implementations the mutex initialization requires a memory
allocation and so it does fail in practice.
Assert that initialization succeeds to ensure that mutex guarantees
mutual exclusion.
Fixes#34966.
This optimization can result in unsoundness, because it introduces
additional uses of a place holding the discriminant value without
ensuring that it is valid to do so.
If pthread mutex initialization fails, the failure will go unnoticed unless
debug assertions are enabled. Any subsequent use of mutex will also silently
fail, since return values from lock & unlock operations are similarly checked
only through debug assertions.
In some implementations the mutex initialization requires a memory
allocation and so it does fail in practice.
Check that initialization succeeds to ensure that mutex guarantees
mutual exclusion.
