Add `#[track_caller]` to `mirbug`
When a "'no errors encountered even though `delay_span_bug` issued" error results from the `mirbug` function, the file location information points to the `mirbug` function itself, rather than its caller. This doesn't make sense, since the caller is the real source of the bug. Adding `#[track_caller]` will produce diagnostics that are more useful to anyone fixing the ICE.
Extend const_convert to rest of blanket core::convert impls
This adds constness to all the blanket impls in `core::convert` under the existing `const_convert` feature, tracked by #88674.
Existing impls under that feature:
```rust
impl<T> const From<T> for T;
impl<T, U> const Into<U> for T where U: ~const From<T>;
impl<T> const ops::Try for Option<T>;
impl<T> const ops::FromResidual for Option<T>;
impl<T, E> const ops::Try for Result<T, E>;
impl<T, E, F> const ops::FromResidual<Result<convert::Infallible, E>> for Result<T, F> where F: ~const From<E>;
```
Additional impls:
```rust
impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized> const AsRef<U> for &T where T: ~const AsRef<U>;
impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized> const AsRef<U> for &mut T where T: ~const AsRef<U>;
impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized> const AsMut<U> for &mut T where T: ~const AsMut<U>;
impl<T, U> const TryInto<U> for T where U: ~const TryFrom<T>;
impl<T, U> const TryFrom<U> for T where U: ~const Into<T>;
```
Prefer projection candidates instead of param_env candidates for Sized predicates
Fixes#89352
Also includes some drive by logging and verbose printing changes that I found useful when debugging this, but I can remove this if needed.
This is a little hacky - but imo no more than the rest of `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`. Importantly, in a Chalk-like world, both candidates should be completely compatible.
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
rustdoc: avoid many `Symbol` to `String` conversions.
Particularly when constructing file paths and fully qualified paths.
This avoids a lot of allocations, speeding things up on almost all
examples.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
I seem to recall that in general, it's best to request an allocation
with a size that's a power of 2. The low estimate of 5 was probably a
little too low as well.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #92045 (Don't fall back to crate-level opaque type definitions.)
- #92381 (Suggest `return`ing tail expressions in async functions)
- #92768 (Partially stabilize `maybe_uninit_extra`)
- #92810 (Deduplicate box deref and regular deref suggestions)
- #92818 (Update documentation for doc_cfg feature)
- #92840 (Fix some lints documentation)
- #92849 (Clippyup)
- #92854 (Use the updated Rust logo in rustdoc)
- #92864 (Fix a missing dot in the main item heading)
Failed merges:
- #92838 (Clean up some links in RELEASES)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Deduplicate box deref and regular deref suggestions
Remove the suggestion code special-cased for Box deref.
r? ```@camelid```
since you introduced the code in #90627
Partially stabilize `maybe_uninit_extra`
This covers:
```rust
impl<T> MaybeUninit<T> {
pub unsafe fn assume_init_read(&self) -> T { ... }
pub unsafe fn assume_init_drop(&mut self) { ... }
}
```
It does not cover the const-ness of `write` under `const_maybe_uninit_write` nor the const-ness of `assume_init_read` (this commit adds `const_maybe_uninit_assume_init_read` for that).
FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63567#issuecomment-958590287.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Suggest `return`ing tail expressions in async functions
This PR fixes#92308.
Previously, the suggestion to `return` tail expressions (introduced in #81769) did not apply to `async` functions, as the suggestion checked whether the types were equal disregarding `impl Future<Output = T>` syntax sugar for `async` functions. This PR changes that in order to fix a potential papercut.
I'm not sure if this is the "right" way to do this, so if there is a better way then please let me know.
I amended an existing test introduced in #81769 to add a regression test for this, if you think I should make a separate test I will.
Don't fall back to crate-level opaque type definitions.
That would just hide bugs, as it works accidentally if the opaque type is defined at the crate level.
Only works after #90948 which worked by accident for our entire test suite.
Closure capture cleanup & refactor
Follow up of #89648
Each commit is self-contained and the rationale/changes are documented in the commit message, so it's advisable to review commit by commit.
The code is significantly cleaner (at least IMO), but that could have some perf implication, so I'd suggest a perf run.
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc `@arora-aman`
