This is causing maybe_get_doc to fail when called at the top level of
the metadata and doesn't appear to be needed anymore.
A try build succeeded so this should be okay.
- don't check for an hardcoded copyright claim year, check the 2 surrounding strings instead
- logic: if either the `//` or `#`-style copyright patterns are found, don't invalidate
- cleanup hardcoded content and streamline the few files with different line breaks
r? @brson
This removes the feature where newtype structs can be dereferenced like pointers, and likewise where certain enums can be dereferenced (which I imagine nobody realized still existed). This ad-hoc behavior is to be replaced by a more general overloadable dereference trait in the future.
I've been nursing this patch for two months and think it's about rebased up to master.
@nikomatsakis this makes a bunch of your type checking code noticeably uglier.
If there is a lot of data in thread-local storage some implementations
of pthreads (e.g. glibc) fail if you don't request a stack large enough
-- by adjusting for the minimum size we guarantee that our stacks are
always large enough. Issue #6233.
LLVM appears to generate calls to exp10 on ARM and bionic does not define it.
This makes code that links to libextra (which I guess does some exponentiation on the stat module) link correctly.
In a multi-host build the mklldeps.py tool is getting called before
all the llvm-configs are built. I am not actually sure the cause. I
had convinced myself that DEF_LLVM_RULES needed to be called before
the llvmdeps.rs rule, but now looking at it again I can't see why.
Here's the error: http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/dist2-linux/builds/11/steps/compile/logs/stdio
r? @alexcrichton
Previously this was an `rtabort!`, indicating a runtime bug. Promote
this to a more intentional abort and print a (slightly) more
informative error message.
Can't test this sense our test suite can't handle an abort exit.
I consider this to close#910, and that we should open another issue about implementing less conservative semantics here.
After writing some benchmarks for ebml::reader::vuint_at() I noticed that LLVM doesn't seem to inline the from_be32 function even though it only does a call to the bswap32 intrinsic in the x86_64 case. Marking the functions with #[inline(always)] fixes that and seems to me a reasonable thing to do. I got the following measurements in my vuint_at() benchmarks:
- Before
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_A_aligned ... bench: 1075 ns/iter (+/- 58)
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_A_unaligned ... bench: 1073 ns/iter (+/- 5)
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_D_aligned ... bench: 1150 ns/iter (+/- 5)
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_D_unaligned ... bench: 1151 ns/iter (+/- 6)
- Inline from_be32
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_A_aligned ... bench: 769 ns/iter (+/- 9)
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_A_unaligned ... bench: 795 ns/iter (+/- 6)
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_D_aligned ... bench: 758 ns/iter (+/- 8)
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_D_unaligned ... bench: 759 ns/iter (+/- 8)
- Using vuint_at_slow()
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_A_aligned ... bench: 646 ns/iter (+/- 7)
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_A_unaligned ... bench: 645 ns/iter (+/- 3)
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_D_aligned ... bench: 907 ns/iter (+/- 4)
test ebml::bench::vuint_at_D_unaligned ... bench: 1085 ns/iter (+/- 16)
As expected inlining from_be32() gave a considerable speedup.
I also tried how the "slow" version fared against the optimized version and noticed that it's
actually a bit faster for small A class integers (using only two bytes) but slower for big D class integers (using four bytes)
If there is a lot of data in thread-local storage some implementations
of pthreads (e.g. glibc) fail if you don't request a stack large enough
-- by adjusting for the minimum size we guarantee that our stacks are
always large enough. Issue #6233.
In a multi-host build the mklldeps.py tool is getting called before
all the llvm-configs are built. I am not actually sure the cause. I
had convinced myself that DEF_LLVM_RULES needed to be called before
the llvmdeps.rs rule, but now looking at it again I can't see why.
