Add inline assembly support for m68k
I believe this should be correct, to the extent I understand the logic around inline assembly. M68k is fairly straightforward here, other than having separate address registers.
Fix btree `CursorMut::insert_after` check
Fixes a check inside `BTreeMap`'s `CursorMut::insert_after`, where it would peek the previous element to check whether the inserted key is below the next one, instead of peeking the next element.
cleanup our region error API
- require `TypeErrCtxt` to always result in an error, closing #108810
- move `resolve_regions_and_report_errors` to the `ObligationCtxt`
- call `process_registered_region_obligations` in `resolve_regions`
- move `resolve_regions` into the `outlives` submodule
- add `#[must_use]` to functions returning lists of errors
r? types
Erase lifetimes above `ty::INNERMOST` when probing ambiguous types
Turns out that `TyCtxt::replace_escaping_bound_vars_uncached` only erases bound vars exactly at `ty::INNERMOST`, and not everything above. This regresses the suggestions for non-lifetime binders, but oh well, I don't really care about those.
Fixes#110052
don't splice from files into pipes in io::copy
This fixes potential data ordering issue where a write performed after a copy operation could become visible in the copy even though it signaled completion.
I assumed that by not setting `SPLICE_F_MOVE` we would be safe and the kernel would do a copy in kernel space and we could avoid the read-write syscall and copy-to/from-userspace costs. But apparently that flag only makes a difference when splicing from a pipe, but not when splicing into it.
Context: https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/2/9/673
I'm surprised the compiler doesn't warn about these. It appears having
an `impl` on a struct is enough to avoid a warning about it never being
constructed.
Preserve argument indexes when inlining MIR
We store argument indexes on VarDebugInfo. Unlike the previous method of relying on the variable index to know whether a variable is an argument, this survives MIR inlining.
We also no longer check if var.source_info.scope is the outermost scope. When a function gets inlined, the arguments to the inner function will no longer be in the outermost scope. What we care about though is whether they were in the outermost scope prior to inlining, which we know by whether we assigned an argument index.
Fixes#83217
I considered using `Option<NonZeroU16>` instead of `Option<u16>` to store the index. I didn't because `TypeFoldable` isn't implemented for `NonZeroU16` and because it looks like due to padding, it currently wouldn't make any difference. But I indexed from 1 anyway because (a) it'll make it easier if later it becomes worthwhile to use a `NonZeroU16` and because the arguments were previously indexed from 1, so it made for a smaller change.
This is my first PR on rust-lang/rust, so apologies if I've gotten anything not quite right.
Fix `--extend-css` option
Fixes#110002.
The file was generated in the wrong folder so I moved it into `static.files` as it made more sense to have there instead of changing the path in the templates.
I also added a GUI test to ensure that this option won't break unexpectedly again.
Do not use ImplDerivedObligationCause for inherent impl method error reporting
We were constructing a `TraitRef` out of impl substs, for an *inherent* impl that has no corresponding trait. Instead of doing that, let's construct a meaningful obligation cause code, and instead adjust the error reporting machinery to handle that correctly.
Fixes#110131
cc #106702, which introduced this regression
Fix x check --stage 1 when download-ci-llvm=false
Bootstrap tries to avoid building LLVM unless it needs to; in particular we only build it for `x build`, not `x check`. Unfortunately, the check forgot about existence of stages - it would break if you used `x check --stage 1`:
```
= note: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lPolly: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lPollyISL: No such file or directory
```
Fix it to work for stage 1.
I recommend reading this commit-by-commit; the first one makes a bunch of whitespace changes but otherwise doesn't change the logic.
sync::mpsc: synchronize receiver disconnect with initialization
Receiver disconnection relies on the incorrect assumption that `head.index != tail.index` implies that the channel is initialized (i.e `head.block` and `tail.block` point to allocated blocks). However, it can happen that `head.index != tail.index` and `head.block == null` at the same time which leads to a segfault when a channel is dropped in that state.
This can happen because initialization is performed in two steps. First, the tail block is allocated and the `tail.block` is set. If that is successful `head.block` is set to the same pointer. Importantly, initialization is skipped if `tail.block` is not null.
Therefore we can have the following situation:
1. Thread A starts to send the first value of the channel, observes that `tail.block` is null and begins initialization. It sets `tail.block` to point to a newly allocated block and then gets preempted. `head.block` is still null at this point.
2. Thread B starts to send the second value of the channel, observes that `tail.block` *is not* null and proceeds with writing its value in the allocated tail block and sets `tail.index` to 1.
3. Thread B drops the receiver of the channel which observes that `head.index != tail.index` (0 and 1 respectively), therefore there must be messages to drop. It starts traversing the linked list from `head.block` which is still a null pointer, leading to a segfault.
This PR fixes this problem by waiting for initialization to complete when `head.index != tail.index` and the `head.block` is still null. A similar check exists in `start_recv` for similar reasons.
Fixes#110001
fix: ensure bad `#[test]` invocs retain correct AST
Fixes#109816
Ensures that a `StmtKind::Item` doesn't get converted into a plain `Item` (causing the ICE from the linked issue) Also unifies the error path a bit.
Replace rustdoc-ui/{c,z}-help tests with a stable run-make test
This make rustdoc resilient to changes in the debugging options while still testing that it matches rustc.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109391.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #110153 (Fix typos in compiler)
- #110165 (rustdoc: use CSS `overscroll-behavior` instead of JavaScript)
- #110175 (Symbol cleanups)
- #110203 (Remove `..` from return type notation)
- #110205 (rustdoc: make settings radio and checks thicker, less contrast)
- #110222 (Improve the error message when forwarding a matched fragment to another macro)
- #110237 (Split out a separate feature gate for impl trait in associated types)
- #110241 (tidy: Issue an error when UI test limits are too high)
Failed merges:
- #110218 (Remove `ToRegionVid`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
tidy: Issue an error when UI test limits are too high
cc #73494
Ensuring the limits are as low as they need to be will make it harder to accidentally add new tests to any large directories
Split out a separate feature gate for impl trait in associated types
in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/107645 it was decided that we'll take a new route for type alias impl trait. The exact route isn't clear yet, so while I'm working on implementing some of these proposed changes (e.g. in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110010) to be able to experiment with them, I will also work on stabilizing another sugar version first: impl trait in associated types. Similarly I'll look into creating feature gates for impl trait in const/static types.
This PR does nothing but split the feature gate, so that you need to enable a different feature gate for
```rust
impl Trait for Type {
type Assoc = impl SomeTrait;
}
```
than what you need for `type Foo = impl SomeTrait;`
Improve the error message when forwarding a matched fragment to another macro
Adds a link to [Forwarding a matched fragment](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/macros-by-example.html#forwarding-a-matched-fragment) section of the Rust Reference, and suggests a possible fix (using `:tt` instead in the macro definition).
Also removes typos from the original message, it should be `:lifetime` instead of `$lifetime`.
## Motivation
When trying to write a macro which uses a literal in the matcher from the outer macro, like the following one, using a fragment specified that isn't one of `:ident`, `:lifetime`, or `:tt` currently results in a hard to understand message.
```rs
macro_rules! make_t_for_all_tokens {
($($name:literal as $variant:expr,)*) => {
macro_rules! t {
$(
($name) => {
$variant
};
)*
}
};
}
make_t_for_all_tokens! {
"fn" as Token::Fn,
"return" as Token::Return,
"let" as Token::Let,
}
// This creates
//
// macro_rules! t {
// ("fn") => {
// Token::Fn
// };
// ("return") => {
// Token::Return
// };
// ("let") => {
// Token::Let
// };
// }
t!["fn"];
```
### Before
```
error: no rules expected the token `"fn"`
--> src/main.rs:103:10
|
32 | macro_rules! t {
| -------------- when calling this macro
...
103 | t!["fn"];
| ^^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call
|
note: while trying to match `"fn"`
--> src/main.rs:34:6
|
34 | ($name) => {
| ^^^^^
...
58 | / make_t_for_all_tokens! {
59 | | "fn" as Token::Fn,
60 | | "return" as Token::Return,
61 | | "let" as Token::Let,
62 | | }
| |_- in this macro invocation
= note: captured metavariables except for `$tt`, `$ident` and `$lifetime` cannot be compared to other tokens
= note: this error originates in the macro `make_t_for_all_tokens` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
### After
```
error: no rules expected the token `"fn"`
--> src/main.rs:103:10
|
32 | macro_rules! t {
| -------------- when calling this macro
...
103 | t!["fn"];
| ^^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call
|
note: while trying to match `"fn"`
--> src/main.rs:34:6
|
34 | ($name) => {
| ^^^^^
...
58 | / make_t_for_all_tokens! {
59 | | "fn" as Token::Fn,
60 | | "return" as Token::Return,
61 | | "let" as Token::Let,
62 | | }
| |_- in this macro invocation
= note: captured metavariables except for `:tt`, `:ident` and `:lifetime` cannot be compared to other tokens
= note: see https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/macros-by-example.html#forwarding-a-matched-fragment for more information
= help: try using `:tt` instead in the macro definition
= note: this error originates in the macro `make_t_for_all_tokens` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
## Unresolved questions
- Preferrably the suggestion should be attached to the `$name:literal` part of the outer macro, instead of being in the notes section at the end. But I'm not familiar with how the compiler works at all, and I have no idea how to approach this kind of solution.
- `@Nilstrieb` raised a question that the suggestion of adding `:tt` isn't accurate when there's more than `tt` being matched, for example when the input is an `item`.
Remove `..` from return type notation
`@nikomatsakis` and I decided that using `..` in the return-type notation syntax is probably overkill.
r? `@eholk` since you reviewed the last one
Since this is piggybacking now totally off of a pre-existing syntax (parenthesized generics), let me know if you need any explanation of the logic here, since it's a bit more complicated now.
Fixes the desktop scrolling weirdness mentioned in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98775#issuecomment-1182575603
As described in the MDN page for this property:
* The current Firefox ESR is 102, and the first Firefox version
to support this feature is 59.
* The current Chrome version 112, and the first version to support
this is 63.
* Edge is described as having a minor bug in `none` mode, but we
use `contain` mode anyway, so it doesn't matter.
* Safari 16, released September 2022, is the last browser to
add this feature, and is also the oldest version we officially
support.
This is very dependent on subjectivity and what screen you use,
but this change makes the radio buttons' outer circle less ugly.
This is because I could see the pixels very clearly, thanks to the
very thin line and high contrast. This change makes both less
severe, giving your browser's antialiasing algorithm more to
work with. Since it's thicker, lowering the contrast shouldn't
impact visibility.
