- Made custom syntax extensions capable of expanding custom macros by moving `SyntaxEnv` into `ExtCtx`
- Added convenience method on `ExtCtx` for getting a macro expander.
- Made a few things private to force only a single way to use them (through `ExtCtx`)
- Removed some ancient commented-out code
Closes#14946
Closes#15690 (Guide: improve error handling)
Closes#15729 (Guide: guessing game)
Closes#15751 (repair macro docs)
Closes#15766 (rustc: Print a smaller hash on -v)
Closes#15815 (Add unit test for rlibc)
Closes#15820 (Minor refactoring and features in rustc driver for embedders)
Closes#15822 (rustdoc: Add an --extern flag analagous to rustc's)
Closes#15824 (Document Deque trait and bitv.)
Closes#15832 (syntax: Join consecutive string literals in format strings together)
Closes#15837 (Update LLVM to include NullCheckElimination pass)
Closes#15841 (Rename to_str to to_string)
Closes#15847 (Purge #[!resolve_unexported] from the compiler)
Closes#15848 (privacy: Add publically-reexported foreign item to exported item set)
Closes#15849 (fix string in from_utf8_lossy_100_multibyte benchmark)
Closes#15850 (Get rid of few warnings in tests)
Closes#15852 (Clarify the std::vec::Vec::with_capacity docs)
Emit a single rt::Piece per consecutive string literals. String literals
are split on {{ or }} escapes.
Saves a small amount of static storage and emitted code size.
In f1ad425199, I changed the handling
of macros, to prevent macro invocations from occurring in fully expanded
source. Instead, I added a side table. It contained only the
spans of the macros, because this was the only information required
in order to make macro export work.
However, librustdoc was also affected by this change, since it
extracts macro information in a similar way. As a result of the earlier
change, exported macros were no longer documented.
In order to repair this, I've adjusted the side table to contain whole
items, rather than just the spans.
We now build the game at the end of the first section.
I wanted to do it as we went along, but it's too hard with these fundamentals
not in place. The rest will do the 'as we go' approach, but I think this is
better.
Here’s what the Vim manual says in *:syn-include*:
:sy[ntax] include [@{grouplist-name}] {file-name}
All syntax items declared in the included file will have the
"contained" flag added. In addition, if a group list is
specified, all top-level syntax items in the included file will
be added to that list.
We had two rules for `rustModPath`, one `contained` and the other not.
The effect was that the second (now renamed to `rustModPathInUse`) was
being included in the group list, and thus that all identifiers were
being highlighted as `Include`, which is definitely not what we wanted.
