There was a test for this, but it wasn't actually working because the first
recursive expansion failed. (The comma...)
Even with this limit, that test (when fixed) still takes some time to pass
because of the exponential growth of the expansions, so I disabled it and added
a different one without growth.
3574: Fix completion of HashMap::new r=matklad a=flodiebold
The `ty` function in code_model returned the type with placeholders for type parameters. That's nice for printing, but not good for completion, because placeholders won't unify with anything else: So the type we got for `HashMap` was `HashMap<K, V, T>`, which doesn't unify with `HashMap<?, ?, RandomState>`, so the `new` method wasn't shown.
Now we instead return `HashMap<{unknown}, {unknown}, {unknown}>`, which does unify with the impl type. Maybe we should just expose this properly as variables though, i.e. we'd return something like `exists<type, type, type> HashMap<?0, ?1, ?2>` (in Chalk notation). It'll make the API more complicated, but harder to misuse. (And it would handle cases like `type TypeAlias<T> = HashMap<T, T>` more correctly.)
The `ty` function for fields was used for signature help, so there we want placeholders so that it looks nicer, I think. Hence I renamed it to `signature_ty`.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <florian.diebold@freiheit.com>
The `ty` function in code_model returned the type with placeholders for type
parameters. That's nice for printing, but not good for completion, because
placeholders won't unify with anything else: So the type we got for `HashMap`
was `HashMap<K, V, T>`, which doesn't unify with `HashMap<?, ?, RandomState>`,
so the `new` method wasn't shown.
Now we instead return `HashMap<{unknown}, {unknown}, {unknown}>`, which does
unify with the impl type. Maybe we should just expose this properly as variables
though, i.e. we'd return something like `exists<type, type, type> HashMap<?0,
?1, ?2>` (in Chalk notation). It'll make the API more complicated, but harder to
misuse. (And it would handle cases like `type TypeAlias<T> = HashMap<T, T>` more
correctly.)
3553: Completions do not show for function with same name as mod r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
fixes#3444
I've added a test case in `crates/ra_ide/src/completion/complete_path.rs` which verifies the described behavior in #3444. Digging in, I found that [the module scope iterator](ba62d8bd1c/crates/ra_ide/src/completion/complete_path.rs (L22)) only provides the module `z`, and does not provide the function `z` (although if I name the function something else then it does show up here).
I thought perhaps the name wasn't being properly resolved, but I added a test in `crates/ra_hir_def/src/nameres/tests.rs` which seems to suggest that it is? I've tried to figure out how to bridge the gap between these two tests (one passing, one failing) to see where the function `z` is being dropped, but to this point I haven't been able to track it down.
Any pointers on where I might look for this?
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
3543: Parameter inlay hint separate from variable type inlay? #2876 r=matklad a=slyngbaek
Add setting to allow enabling either type inlay hints or parameter
inlay hints or both. Group the the max inlay hint length option
into the object.
- Add a new type for the inlayHint options.
- Add tests to ensure the inlays don't happen on the server side
Co-authored-by: Steffen Lyngbaek <steffenlyngbaek@gmail.com>
3559: Implement builtin assert! macro r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR add a dummy implementation for `assert!` macro, which mainly make `hover` and `goto-def` works on arguments inside it.
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3556: settings: rust-analyzer.cargo-watch.enable: clarify that the setting … r=matklad a=matthiaskrgr
…enables the cargo-watch command and not "cargo check"
Co-authored-by: Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de>
3564: Better handling of a few kinds of cargo/clippy diagnostics r=matklad a=kiljacken
This was initially supposed to just be a fix for #3433, but I caught a few things that ended up being useful as well.
This PR primarily makes us handle multi-edit fix suggestions properly. Instead of just applying the first fix we apply all the parts of the fix in a single action.
Second up, this PR handles diagnostics with multiple primary spans, f.x. the unused import diagnostic from rustc:
The LSP doesn't handle this too well, as it only support a single complete range for each diagnostic, so we get duplicate messages in the problem panel of VSCode:
However, I feel like the improved visual aspect in-editor outweighs the duplication in the problem panel. I'm open to not including the second commit if anybody really doesn't like the idea of duplicate diagnostics in the problem pane.
Fixes#3433Fixes#3257
Co-authored-by: Emil Lauridsen <mine809@gmail.com>
- Instead of a single object type, use several individual nested types
to allow toggling from the settings GUI
- Remove unused struct definitions
- Install and test that the toggles work
3549: Implement env! macro r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR implements `env!` macro by adding following things:
1. Added `additional_outdirs` settings in vscode. (naming to be bikeshed)
2. Added `ExternSourceId` which is a wrapping for SourceRootId but only used in extern sources. It is because `OUT_DIR` is not belonged to any crate and we have to access it behind an `AstDatabase`.
3. This PR does not implement the `OUT_DIR` parsing from `cargo check`. I don't have general design about this, @kiljacken could we reuse some cargo watch code for that ?
~~Block on [#3536]~~
PS: After this PR , we (kind of) completed the `include!(concat!(env!('OUT_DIR'), "foo.rs")` macro call combo. [Exodia Obliterate!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfqNH3FoGi0)
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3542: Renames work on struct field shorthands r=matklad a=m-n
When renaming either a local or a struct field, struct field shorthands are now renamed correctly.
Happy to refactor this if it doesn't fit the design of the code. Thanks for adding the suggestion of where to start on the issue.
I wasn't sure if I should also look at the behavior of renaming when placing the cursor at the field shorthand; the following describes the behavior with this patch:
```rust
#[test]
fn test_rename_field_shorthand_for_unspecified() {
// when renaming a shorthand, should we have a way to specify
// between renaming the field and the local?
//
// If not is this the correct default?
test_rename(
r#"
struct Foo {
i: i32,
}
impl Foo {
fn new(i: i32) -> Self {
Self { i<|> }
}
}
"#,
"j",
r#"
struct Foo {
i: i32,
}
impl Foo {
fn new(j: i32) -> Self {
Self { i: j }
}
}
"#,
);
}
```
Resolves#3431
Co-authored-by: Matt Niemeir <matt.niemeir@gmail.com>
- Updated naming of config
- Define struct in ra_ide and use remote derive in rust-analyzer/config
- Make inlayConfig type more flexible to support more future types
- Remove constructor only used in tests
Add setting to allow enabling either type inlay hints or parameter
inlay hints or both. Group the the max inlay hint length option
into the object.
- Add a new type for the inlayHint options.
- Add tests to ensure the inlays don't happen on the server side
3552: Fix completion with a partially unknown type r=matklad a=flodiebold
To test whether the receiver type matches for the impl, we unify the given self
type (in this case `HashSet<{unknown}>`) with the self type of the
impl (`HashSet<?0>`), but if the given self type contains Unknowns, they won't
be unified with the variables in those places. So we got a receiver type that
was different from the expected one, and concluded the impl doesn't match.
The fix is slightly hacky; if after the unification, our variables are still
there, we make them fall back to Unknown. This does make some sense though,
since we don't want to 'leak' the variables.
Fixes#3547.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
To test whether the receiver type matches for the impl, we unify the given self
type (in this case `HashSet<{unknown}>`) with the self type of the
impl (`HashSet<?0>`), but if the given self type contains Unknowns, they won't
be unified with the variables in those places. So we got a receiver type that
was different from the expected one, and concluded the impl doesn't match.
The fix is slightly hacky; if after the unification, our variables are still
there, we make them fall back to Unknown. This does make some sense though,
since we don't want to 'leak' the variables.
Fixes#3547.
