Implement From<&mut str> for String
I ran into this missing impl when trying to do `String::from` on the result returned from this API in the `uuid` crate:
https://docs.rs/uuid/0.8.1/uuid/adapter/struct.Hyphenated.html#method.encode_lower
I wasn't sure what to put in the stability annotation. I'd appreciate some help with that :)
Implement Error for TryReserveError
I noticed that the Error trait wasn't implemented for TryReserveError. (#48043)
Not sure if the error messages and code style are 100% correct, it's my first time contributing to the Rust std.
Allow ZSTs in `AllocRef`
Allows ZSTs in all `AllocRef` methods. The implementation of `AllocRef` for `Global` and `System` were adjusted to reflect those changes.
This is the second item on the roadmap to support ZSTs in `AllocRef`: https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-allocators/issues/38#issuecomment-595861542
After this has landed, I will adapt `RawVec`, but since this will be a pretty big overhaul, it makes sense to do a different PR for it.
~~Requires #69794 to land first~~
r? @Amanieu
More documentation and simplification of BTreeMap's internals
Salvage the documentation and simplification from #67980, without changing the type locked down by debuginfo.
r? @rkruppe
cleanup more iterator usages (and other things)
* Improve weird formatting by moving comment inside else-code block.
* Use .any(x) instead of .find(x).is_some() on iterators.
* Use .nth(x) instead of .skip(x).next() on iterators.
* Simplify conditions like x + 1 <= y to x < y
* Use let instead of match to get value of enum with single variant.
Remove `usable_size` APIs
This removes the usable size APIs:
- remove `usable_size` (obv)
- change return type of allocating methods to include the allocated size
- remove `_excess` API
r? @Amanieu
closesrust-lang/wg-allocators#17
Clarify explanation of Vec<T> 'fn resize'
1. Clarified on what should implement `Clone` trait.
2. Minor grammar fix:
to be able clone => to be able **to** clone
BTreeMap navigation done safer & faster
It turns out that there was a faster way to do the tree navigation code bundled in #67073, by moving from edge to KV and from KV to next edge separately. It extracts most of the code as safe functions, and contains the duplication of handles within the short wrapper functions.
This somehow hits a sweet spot in the compiler because it reports boosts all over the board:
```
>cargo benchcmp pre3.txt posz4.txt --threshold 5
name pre3.txt ns/iter posz4.txt ns/iter diff ns/iter diff % speedup
btree::map::first_and_last_0 40 37 -3 -7.50% x 1.08
btree::map::first_and_last_100 58 44 -14 -24.14% x 1.32
btree::map::iter_1000 8,920 3,419 -5,501 -61.67% x 2.61
btree::map::iter_100000 1,069,290 411,615 -657,675 -61.51% x 2.60
btree::map::iter_20 169 58 -111 -65.68% x 2.91
btree::map::iter_mut_1000 8,701 3,303 -5,398 -62.04% x 2.63
btree::map::iter_mut_100000 1,034,560 405,975 -628,585 -60.76% x 2.55
btree::map::iter_mut_20 165 58 -107 -64.85% x 2.84
btree::set::clone_100 1,831 1,562 -269 -14.69% x 1.17
btree::set::clone_100_and_clear 1,831 1,565 -266 -14.53% x 1.17
btree::set::clone_100_and_into_iter 1,917 1,541 -376 -19.61% x 1.24
btree::set::clone_100_and_pop_all 2,609 2,441 -168 -6.44% x 1.07
btree::set::clone_100_and_remove_all 4,598 3,927 -671 -14.59% x 1.17
btree::set::clone_100_and_remove_half 2,765 2,551 -214 -7.74% x 1.08
btree::set::clone_10k 191,610 164,616 -26,994 -14.09% x 1.16
btree::set::clone_10k_and_clear 192,003 164,616 -27,387 -14.26% x 1.17
btree::set::clone_10k_and_into_iter 200,037 163,010 -37,027 -18.51% x 1.23
btree::set::clone_10k_and_pop_all 267,023 250,913 -16,110 -6.03% x 1.06
btree::set::clone_10k_and_remove_all 536,230 464,100 -72,130 -13.45% x 1.16
btree::set::clone_10k_and_remove_half 453,350 430,545 -22,805 -5.03% x 1.05
btree::set::difference_random_100_vs_100 1,787 801 -986 -55.18% x 2.23
btree::set::difference_random_100_vs_10k 2,978 2,696 -282 -9.47% x 1.10
btree::set::difference_random_10k_vs_100 111,075 54,734 -56,341 -50.72% x 2.03
btree::set::difference_random_10k_vs_10k 246,380 175,980 -70,400 -28.57% x 1.40
btree::set::difference_staggered_100_vs_100 1,789 951 -838 -46.84% x 1.88
btree::set::difference_staggered_100_vs_10k 2,798 2,606 -192 -6.86% x 1.07
btree::set::difference_staggered_10k_vs_10k 176,452 97,401 -79,051 -44.80% x 1.81
btree::set::intersection_100_neg_vs_10k_pos 34 32 -2 -5.88% x 1.06
btree::set::intersection_100_pos_vs_100_neg 30 27 -3 -10.00% x 1.11
btree::set::intersection_random_100_vs_100 1,537 613 -924 -60.12% x 2.51
btree::set::intersection_random_100_vs_10k 2,793 2,649 -144 -5.16% x 1.05
btree::set::intersection_random_10k_vs_10k 222,127 147,166 -74,961 -33.75% x 1.51
btree::set::intersection_staggered_100_vs_100 1,447 622 -825 -57.01% x 2.33
btree::set::intersection_staggered_100_vs_10k 2,606 2,382 -224 -8.60% x 1.09
btree::set::intersection_staggered_10k_vs_10k 143,620 58,790 -84,830 -59.07% x 2.44
btree::set::is_subset_100_vs_100 1,349 488 -861 -63.83% x 2.76
btree::set::is_subset_100_vs_10k 1,720 1,428 -292 -16.98% x 1.20
btree::set::is_subset_10k_vs_10k 135,984 48,527 -87,457 -64.31% x 2.80
```
The `first_and_last` ones are noise (they don't do iteration), the others seem genuine.
As always, approved by Miri.
Also, a separate commit with some more benchmarks of mutable behaviour (which also benefit).
r? @cuviper
Audit liballoc for leaks in `Drop` impls when user destructor panics
Inspired by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67243 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67235, this audits and hopefully fixes the remaining `Drop` impls in liballoc for resource leaks in the presence of panics in destructors called by the affected `Drop` impl.
This does not touch `Hash{Map,Set}` since they live in hashbrown. They have similar issues though.
r? @KodrAus
Implement split_inclusive for slice and str
# Overview
* Implement `split_inclusive` for `slice` and `str` and `split_inclusive_mut` for `slice`
* `split_inclusive` is a substring/subslice splitting iterator that includes the matched part in the iterated substrings as a terminator.
* EDIT: The behaviour has now changed, as per @KodrAus 's input, to the same semantics with the `split_terminator` function. I updated the examples below.
* Two examples below:
```Rust
let data = "\nMäry häd ä little lämb\nLittle lämb\n";
let split: Vec<&str> = data.split_inclusive('\n').collect();
assert_eq!(split, ["\n", "Märy häd ä little lämb\n", "Little lämb\n"]);
```
```Rust
let uppercase_separated = "SheePSharKTurtlECaT";
let mut first_char = true;
let split: Vec<&str> = uppercase_separated.split_inclusive(|c: char| {
let split = !first_char && c.is_uppercase();
first_char = split;
split
}).collect();
assert_eq!(split, ["SheeP", "SharK", "TurtlE", "CaT"]);
```
# Justification for the API
* I was surprised to find that stdlib currently only has splitting iterators that leave out the matched part. In my experience, wanting to leave a substring terminator as a part of the substring is a pretty common usecase.
* This API is strictly more expressive than the standard `split` API: it's easy to get the behaviour of `split` by mapping a subslicing operation that drops the terminator. On the other hand it's impossible to derive this behaviour from `split` without using hacky and brittle `unsafe` code. The normal way to achieve this functionality would be implementing the iterator yourself.
* Especially when dealing with mutable slices, the only way currently is to use `split_at_mut`. This API provides an ergonomic alternative that plays to the strengths of the iterating capabilities of Rust. (Using `split_at_mut` iteratively used to be a real pain before NLL, fortunately the situation is a bit better now.)
# Discussion items
* <s>Does it make sense to mimic `split_terminator` in that the final empty slice would be left off in case of the string/slice ending with a terminator? It might do, as this use case is naturally geared towards considering the matching part as a terminator instead of a separator.</s>
* EDIT: The behaviour was changed to mimic `split_terminator`.
* Does it make sense to have `split_inclusive_mut` for `&mut str`?
Add LinkedList::remove()
LinkedList::remove() removes the element at the specified index and returns it.
I added this because I think having a remove function would be useful to have, and similar functions are in other containers, like Vec and HashMap.
I'm not sure if adding a feature like this requires an RFC or not, so I'm sorry if this PR is premature.
