Do not depend on the stored value when trying to cache on disk.
Having different criteria for loading and saving of query results can lead to saved results that may never be loaded.
Since the on-disk cache is discarded as soon as a compilation error is issued, there should not be any need for an exclusion mecanism based on errors.
As a result, the possibility to condition the storage on the value itself does not appear useful.
Make RSplit<T, P>: Clone not require T: Clone
This addresses a TODO comment. The behavior of `#[derive(Clone)]` *does* result in a `T: Clone` requirement. Playground example:
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=a8b1a9581ff8893baf401d624a53d35b
Add a manual `Clone` implementation, mirroring `Split` and `SplitInclusive`.
`(R)?SplitN(Mut)?` don't have any `Clone` implementations, but I'll leave that for its own pull request.
Add edition configuration to compiletest
This allows the compiletest configuration to set a default edition that can still be overridden with header annotations. Doing this will make it far easier for clippy to get our tests to the newest edition.
r? ```@Manishearth```
Implement -Z location-detail flag
This PR implements the `-Z location-detail` flag as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2091 .
`-Z location-detail=val` controls what location details are tracked when using `caller_location`. This allows users to control what location details are printed as part of panic messages, by allowing them to exclude any combination of filenames, line numbers, and column numbers. This option is intended to provide users with a way to mitigate the size impact of `#[track_caller]`.
Some measurements of the savings of this approach on an embedded binary can be found here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70579#issuecomment-942556822 .
Closes#70580 (unless people want to leave that open as a place for discussion of further improvements).
This is my first real PR to rust, so any help correcting mistakes / understanding side effects / improving my tests is appreciated :)
I have one question: RFC 2091 specified this as a debugging option (I think that is what -Z implies?). Does that mean this can never be stabilized without a separate MCP? If so, do I need to submit an MCP now, or is the initial RFC specifying this option sufficient for this to be merged as is, and then an MCP would be needed for eventual stabilization?
add feature flag for `type_changing_struct_update`
This implements the PR0 part of the mentoring notes within #86618.
overrides the previous inactive #86646 pr.
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
Report fatal lexer errors in `--cfg` command line arguments
Fixes#89358. The erroneous behavior was apparently introduced by `@Mark-Simulacrum` in a678e31911; the idea is to silence individual parser errors and instead emit one catch-all error message after parsing. However, for the example in #89358, a fatal lexer error is created here:
edebf77e00/compiler/rustc_parse/src/lexer/mod.rs (L340-L349)
This fatal error aborts the compilation, and so the call to `new_parser_from_source_str()` never returns and the catch-all error message is never emitted. I have therefore changed the `SilentEmitter` to silence only non-fatal errors; with my changes, for the rustc invocation described in #89358:
```sh
rustc --cfg "abc\""
```
I get the following output:
```
error[E0765]: unterminated double quote string
|
= note: this error occurred on the command line: `--cfg=abc"`
```
nice_region_error: Include lifetime placeholders in error output
As you can see in src/test/ui/traits/self-without-lifetime-constraint.stderr
you can get very confusing type names if you don't have this.
Fixes#87763
Stabilise unix_process_wait_more, extra ExitStatusExt methods
This stabilises the feature `unix_process_wait_more`. Tracking issue #80695, FCP needed.
This was implemented in #79982 and merged in January.
Implement split_array and split_array_mut
This implements `[T]::split_array::<const N>() -> (&[T; N], &[T])` and `[T; N]::split_array::<const M>() -> (&[T; M], &[T])` and their mutable equivalents. These are another few “missing” array implementations now that const generics are a thing, similar to #74373, #75026, etc. Fixes#74674.
This implements `[T; N]::split_array` returning an array and a slice. Ultimately, this is probably not what we want, we would want the second return value to be an array of length N-M, which will likely be possible with future const generics enhancements. We need to implement the array method now though, to immediately shadow the slice method. This way, when the slice methods get stabilized, calling them on an array will not be automatic through coercion, so we won't have trouble stabilizing the array methods later (cf. into_iter debacle).
An unchecked version of `[T]::split_array` could also be added as in #76014. This would not be needed for `[T; N]::split_array` as that can be compile-time checked. Edit: actually, since split_at_unchecked is internal-only it could be changed to be split_array-only.
Make new symbol mangling scheme default for compiler itself.
As suggest in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89917#issuecomment-945888574, this PR enables the new symbol mangling scheme for the compiler itself. The standard library is still compiled using the legacy mangling scheme so that the new symbol format does not show up in user code (yet).
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Inline CStr::from_ptr
Inlining this function is valuable, as it allows LLVM to apply `strlen`-specific optimizations without having to enable LTO.
For instance, the following function:
```rust
pub fn f(p: *const c_char) -> Option<u8> {
unsafe { CStr::from_ptr(p) }.to_bytes().get(0).copied()
}
```
Looks like this if `CStr::from_ptr` is allowed to be inlined.
```asm
before:
push rax
call qword ptr [rip + std::ffi::c_str::CStr::from_ptr@GOTPCREL]
mov rcx, rax
cmp rdx, 1
sete dl
test rax, rax
sete al
or al, dl
jne .LBB1_2
mov dl, byte ptr [rcx]
.LBB1_2:
xor al, 1
pop rcx
ret
after:
mov dl, byte ptr [rdi]
test dl, dl
setne al
ret
```
Note that optimization turned this from O(N) to O(1) in terms of performance, as LLVM knows that it doesn't really need to call `strlen` to determine whether a string is empty or not.
Rollup of 14 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #87537 (Clarify undefined behaviour in binary heap, btree and hashset docs)
- #88624 (Stabilize feature `saturating_div` for rust 1.58.0)
- #89257 (Give better error for `macro_rules name`)
- #89665 (Ensure that pushing empty path works as before on verbatim paths)
- #89895 (Don't mark for loop iter expression as desugared)
- #89922 (Update E0637 description to mention `&` w/o an explicit lifetime name)
- #89944 (Change `Duration::[try_]from_secs_{f32, f64}` underflow error)
- #89991 (rustc_ast: Turn `MutVisitor::token_visiting_enabled` into a constant)
- #90028 (Reject closures in patterns)
- #90069 (Fix const qualification when executed after promotion)
- #90078 (Add a regression test for issue-83479)
- #90114 (Add some tests for const_generics_defaults)
- #90115 (Add test for issue #78561)
- #90129 (triagebot: Treat `I-*nominated` like `I-nominated`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
triagebot: Treat `I-*nominated` like `I-nominated`
rustbot doesn't allow unauthenticated users to set `I-nominated`; apply the same permissions to the new `I-*nominated` labels.
Add some tests for const_generics_defaults
I think this covers some of the stuff required for stabilisation report, some of these tests are probably covering stuff we already have but it can't hurt to have more :)
r? ````@lcnr````
Fix const qualification when executed after promotion
The const qualification was so far performed before the promotion and
the implementation assumed that it will never encounter a promoted.
With `const_precise_live_drops` feature, checking for live drops is
delayed until after drop elaboration, which in turn runs after
promotion. so the assumption is no longer true. When evaluating
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is now possible to encounter promoteds.
Use type base qualification for the promoted. It is a sound
approximation in general, and in the specific case of promoteds and
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is precise.
Fixes#89938.
rustc_ast: Turn `MutVisitor::token_visiting_enabled` into a constant
It's a visitor property rather than something that needs to be determined at runtime
Update E0637 description to mention `&` w/o an explicit lifetime name
Deal with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89824#issuecomment-941598647. Another solution would be splitting the error code into two as (I think) it's a bit unclear to users why they have the same error code.
Don't mark for loop iter expression as desugared
We typically don't mark spans of lowered things as desugared. This helps Clippy rightly discern when code is (not) from expansion. This was discovered by ``@flip1995`` at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7789#issuecomment-939289501.
Stabilize feature `saturating_div` for rust 1.58.0
The tracking issue is #89381
This seems like a reasonable simple change(?). The feature `saturating_div` was added as part of the ongoing effort to implement a `Saturating` integer type (see #87921). The implementation has been discussed [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87921#issuecomment-899357720) and [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87921#discussion_r691888556). It extends the list of saturating operations on integer types (like `saturating_add`, `saturating_sub`, `saturating_mul`, ...) by the function `fn saturating_div(self, rhs: Self) -> Self`.
The stabilization of the feature `saturating_int_impl` (for the `Saturating` type) needs to have this stabilized first.
Closes#89381
Clarify undefined behaviour in binary heap, btree and hashset docs
Previously, it wasn't clear whether "This could include" was referring to logic errors, or undefined behaviour. Tweak wording to clarify this sentence does not relate to UB.
This addresses a TODO comment. The behavior of #[derive(Clone)]
*does* result in a T: Clone requirement.
Add a manual Clone implementation, matching Split and SplitInclusive.
Previously, it wasn't clear whether "This could include" was referring
to logic errors, or undefined behaviour. Tweak wording to clarify this
sentence does not relate to UB.
