Stop emitting the `dso_local` LLVM attribute for external symbols under the static relocation model on macOS.
This matches Clang's behavior:
973cb2c326/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp (L1038-L1040)
Even if `dso_local` were properly supported in this way on macOS, it seems
incorrect to add this annotation as liberally as we did. The `dso_local`
annotation is for symbols that ultimately end up in the same linkage unit, but
we were adding this annotation even for `static` values inside `extern` blocks
marked with `#[link(type="framework")]`, which should be considered dynamically
linked. Note that Clang likewise avoids emitting `dso_local` for `dllimport`
symbols:
973cb2c326/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp (L1005-L1007)
This issue caused breakage in the `ring` crate, which links to a symbol defined
in `Security.framework` that ultimately resolves to address `0x0`:
b94d61e044/src/rand.rs (L390)
For this symbol, the use of `dso_local` causes LLVM to emit a relocation of
type `X86_64_RELOC_SIGNED`, which is a 32-bit signed PC-relative offset. If the
binary is large enough, `0x0` might be out of range, and the link will fail.
Avoiding `dso_local` causes LLVM to use the GOT instead, emitting a relocation
of type `X86_64_RELOC_GOT_LOAD`, which will properly handle the large offset
and cause the link to succeed.
As a side note, the static relocation model is effectively deprecated for
security reasons on macOS, as it prohibits PIE. It's also completely
unsupported on Apple Silicon, so I don't think it's worth going to the effort
of properly supporting this model on that platform.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86747 (Improve wording of the `drop_bounds` lint)
- #87166 (Show discriminant before overflow in diagnostic for duplicate values.)
- #88077 (Generate an iOS LLVM target with a specific version)
- #88164 (PassWrapper: adapt for LLVM 14 changes)
- #88211 (cleanup: `Span::new` -> `Span::with_lo`)
- #88229 (Suggest importing the right kind of macro.)
- #88238 (Stop tracking namespace in used_imports.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Stop tracking namespace in used_imports.
This changes `used_imports` from a `FxHashSet<(NodeId, Namespace)>` to a `FxHashSet<NodeId>`, as the Namespace information isn't used.
The only point that uses it did three lookups, `|=`'ing them together.
r? `@estebank`
PassWrapper: adapt for LLVM 14 changes
These API changes appear to have all taken place in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105007, which moved HWAddressSanitizerPass and
AddressSanitizerPass to only accept their options type as a ctor
argument instead of the sequence of bools etc. This required a couple of
parameter additions, which I made match the default prior to the
mentioned upstream LLVM change.
This patch restores rustc to building (though not quite passing all
tests, I've mailed other patches for those issues) against LLVM HEAD.
Generate an iOS LLVM target with a specific version
This commit adds the `LC_VERSION_MIN_IPHONEOS` load command to the Mach-O header generated for `aarch64-apple-ios` binaries. The operating system will look for this load command to determine the minimum supported operating system version and will not allow the binary to run if it's absent. This logic already exists for the simulator toolchain.
I've been using `otool` from a [cctools](https://github.com/tpoechtrager/cctools-port) toolchain to parse the header and validate that this change adds the required load command.
This change appears to be enough to build Rust binaries that can run on a jailbroken iPhone.
Improve wording of the `drop_bounds` lint
This PR addresses #86653. The issue is sort of a false positive of the `drop_bounds` lint, but I would argue that the best solution for #86653 is simply a rewording of the warning message and lint description, because even if the lint is _technically_ wrong, it still forces the programmer to think about what they are doing, and they can always use `#[allow(drop_bounds)]` if they think that they really need the `Drop` bound.
There are two issues with the current warning message and lint description:
- First, it says that `Drop` bounds are "useless", which is technically incorrect because they actually do have the effect of allowing you e.g. to call methods that also have a `Drop` bound on their generic arguments for some reason. I have changed the wording to emphasize not that the bound is "useless", but that it is most likely not what was intended.
- Second, it claims that `std::mem::needs_drop` detects whether a type has a destructor. But I think this is also technically wrong: The `Drop` bound says whether the type has a destructor or not, whereas `std::mem::needs_drop` also takes nested types with destructors into account, even if the top-level type does not itself have one (although I'm not 100% sure about the exact terminology here, i.e. whether the "drop glue" of the top-level type counts as a destructor or not).
cc `@jonhoo,` does this solve the issue for you?
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
canonicalize consts before calling try_unify_abstract_consts query
Fixes#88022Fixes#86953Fixes#77708Fixes#82034Fixes#85031
these ICEs were all caused by calling the `try_unify_abstract_consts` query with inference vars in substs
r? `@lcnr`
Fix clippy::collapsible_match with let expressions
This fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#7575 which is a regression from #80357. I am fixing the bug here instead of in the clippy repo (if that's okay) because a) the regression has not been synced yet and b) I would like to land the fix on nightly asap.
The fix is basically to re-generalize `match` and `if let` for the lint implementation (they were split because `if let` no longer desugars to `match` in the HIR).
Also fixesrust-lang/rust-clippy#7586 and fixesrust-lang/rust-clippy#7591
cc `@rust-lang/clippy`
`@xFrednet` do you want to review this?
marker_traits: require `EvaluatedToOk` during winnowing
closes#84955, while it doesn't really fix it in a way that makes me happy it should prevent the issue for now and this
test can't be reproduced anyways, so it doesn't make much sense to keep it open.
fixes#84917 as only one of the impls depends on regions, so we now drop the ambiguous one instead of the correct one.
cc https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/144729-wg-traits/topic/winnowing.20soundly/near/247899832
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Fix example in `Extend<(A, B)>` impl
After looking over the examples in my last PR (#85835) on doc.rust-lang.org/nightly I realized that the example didn't actually show what I wanted it to show 😅
So here's the better example
add file_prefix method to std::path
This is an initial implementation of `std::path::Path::file_prefix`. It is effectively a "left" variant of the existing [`file_stem`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/path/struct.Path.html#method.file_stem) method. An illustration of the difference is
```rust
use std::path::Path;
let path = Path::new("foo.tar.gz");
assert_eq!(path.file_stem(), Some("foo.tar"));
assert_eq!(path.file_prefix(), Some("foo"));
```
In my own development, I generally find I almost always want the prefix, rather than the stem, so I thought it might be best to suggest it's addition to libstd.
Of course, as this is my first contribution, I expect there is probably more work that needs to be done. Additionally, if the libstd team feel this isn't appropriate then so be it.
There has been some [discussion about this on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/file_lstem/near/238076313) and a user there suggested I open a PR to see whether someone in the libstd team thinks it is worth pursuing.
Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #87604 (CI: Verify commits in beta & stable are in upstream branches.)
- #88057 (Update RELEASES to clarify attribute macro values.)
- #88072 (Allow the iOS toolchain to be built on Linux)
- #88170 (Update release note for 1.55.0.)
- #88172 (Test that type alias impl trait happens in a submodule)
- #88179 (Mailmap entry for myself)
- #88182 (We meant to use a trait instead of lifetime here)
- #88183 (test TAIT in different positions)
- #88189 (Add TAIT struct test)
- #88192 (Use of impl trait in an impl as the value for an associated type in a dyn)
- #88194 (Test use of impl Trait in an impl as the value for an associated type in an impl trait)
- #88197 (Test tait use in a fn type)
- #88201 (Test that incomplete inference for TAITs fail)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Instead, avoid registering the problematic well-formed obligation
to begin with. This removes global untracked mutable state,
and avoids potential issues with incremental compilation.
Test tait use in a fn type
r? `@oli-obk`
I thought this was going to work but doesn't, quickly checked with Niko and he told me that we ruled this out for now. I'm not exactly sure why and how but here we have a test with a FIXME :)
Related to #86727
Allow the iOS toolchain to be built on Linux
The iOS toolchain can be built on Linux with minor changes. The compilation will invoke `xcrun` to find the path to the iPhone SDK but a fake `xcrun` executable can be used.
```
#!/bin/sh
echo "/path/to/sdk"
```
The iOS toolchain can then be built and linked with rustup.
```
$ ./x.py build --stage 2 --host x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu \
--target aarch64-apple-ios
$ rustup toolchain link stage1 build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1
```
It's possible to take this toolchain and compile an iOS executable with it. This requires the ld64 linker and an iOS SDK. The ld64 linker can be taken from [cctools](https://github.com/tpoechtrager/cctools-port). A project's .cargo/config can then be edited to use the linker for this target.
```
[target.aarch64-apple-ios]
linker = "/path/to/cctools/bin/arm-apple-darwin-ld"
rustflags = [
"-C",
"""
link-args=
-F/path/to/sdk/System/Library/Frameworks
-L/path/to/sdk/usr/lib
-L/path/to/sdk/usr/lib/system/
-adhoc_codesign
""",
]
```
Update RELEASES to clarify attribute macro values.
As noted in #87681, macros do not work with the `#[path]` attribute. Since the places where macros *can* be used is very limited, I have changed this to just focus on `#[doc]` which is the only attribute where this is really useful.
Optimize unnecessary check in VecDeque::retain
This pr is highly inspired by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88060 which shared the same idea: we can split the `for` loop into stages so that we can remove unnecessary checks like `del > 0`.
## Benchmarks
Before
```rust
test collections::vec_deque::tests::bench_retain_half_10000 ... bench: 290,125 ns/iter (+/- 8,717)
test collections::vec_deque::tests::bench_retain_odd_10000 ... bench: 291,588 ns/iter (+/- 9,621)
test collections::vec_deque::tests::bench_retain_whole_10000 ... bench: 287,426 ns/iter (+/- 9,009)
```
After
```rust
test collections::vec_deque::tests::bench_retain_half_10000 ... bench: 243,940 ns/iter (+/- 8,563)
test collections::vec_deque::tests::bench_retain_odd_10000 ... bench: 242,768 ns/iter (+/- 3,903)
test collections::vec_deque::tests::bench_retain_whole_10000 ... bench: 202,926 ns/iter (+/- 6,332)
```
Based on the current benchmark, this PR will improve the perf of `VecDeque::retain` by around 16%. For special cases, the improvement will be up to 30%.
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
