Set correct `ParamEnv` for `derive_partial_eq_without_eq`
fixes#8867
changelog: Handle differing predicates applied by `#[derive(PartialEq)]` and `#[derive(Eq)]` in `derive_partial_eq_without_eq`
new lint: `borrow_deref_ref`
changelog: ``[`borrow_deref_ref`]``
Related pr: #6837#7577
`@Jarcho` Could you please give a review?
`cargo lintcheck` gives no false negative (but tested crates are out-of-date).
TODO:
1. Not sure the name. `deref_on_immutable_ref` or some others?
Fix `manual_range_contains` false negative with chains of `&&` and `||`
Fixes#8745
Since the precedence for `&&` is the same as itself the HIR for a chain of `&&` ends up with a right skewed tree like:
```
&&
/ \
&& c2
/ \
... c1
```
So only the leftmost `&&` was actually "fully" checked, the top level was just `c2` and `&&` so the `manual_range_contains` lint won't apply. This change makes it also check `c2` with `c1`.
There's a bit of a hacky solution in the [second commit](257f09776a) to check if the number of open/closing parens in the snippet match. This is to prevent a case like `((x % 2 == 0) || (x < 0)) || (x >= 10)` from offering a suggestion like `((x % 2 == 0) || !(0..10).contains(&x)` which now won't compile.
Any suggestions for that paren hack welcome, kinda new to working on this so not too sure about possible solutions :) it's weird because I don't know how else to check for parens in HIR considering they're removed when lowering AST.
changelog: Fix [`manual_range_contains`] false negative with chains of `&&` and `||`
Don't lint `useless_transmute` on types with erased regions
fixes#6356fixes#3340fixes#2906
This should get a proper fix at some point, but this at least gets the lint running on some types.
cc #5343
changelog: Don't lint `useless_transmute` on types with erased regions
`cast_abs_to_unsigned`: do not remove cast if it's required
Fixes#8873
If `iX` is not cast to `uX` then keep the cast rather than removing it
changelog: [`cast_abs_to_unsigned`]: do not remove cast if it's required
needless_late_init: fix ICE when all branches return the never type
Fixes#8911
When the assignment is done in a match guard or the if condition and all of the branches return the never type `assignment_suggestions` would return an empty `Vec` which caused the ICE. It now returns `None` in that scenario
Also moves some tests to the top of the file
changelog: ICE Fixes: [`needless_late_init`] #8911
Fix `[use_self]` false negative with on struct and tuple struct patterns
fixes#8845
changelog: Triggered the warning for ``[`use_self`]`` on `TupleStruct` and `Struct` patterns, whereas currently it's only triggered for `Path` patterns
Fix `empty_line_after_outer_attribute` false positive
This PR fixes a false positive in `empty_line_after_outer_attribute`.
Here is a minimal example that trigger the FP:
```rust
#[derive(clap::Parser)]
#[clap(after_help = "This ia a help message.
You're welcome.
")]
pub struct Args;
```
changelog: PF: [`empty_line_after_outer_attribute`]: No longer lints empty lines in inner string values.
Introduce `allow-dbg-in-tests` config value
related to: Issue #8758, PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/8838
changelog: Introduced `allow-dbg-in-tests` config value. [dbg_macro] does not allow `dbg!` in test code by default.
`get_last_with_len`: lint `VecDeque` and any deref to slice
changelog: [`get_last_with_len`]: lint `VecDeque` and any deref to slice
Previously only `Vec`s were linted, this will now catch any usages on slices, arrays, etc. It also suggests `.back()` for `VecDeque`s
Also moves the lint into `methods/`
`identity_op`: add parenthesis to suggestions where required
changelog: [`identity_op`]: add parenthesis to suggestions where required
Follow up to #8730, wraps the cases we can't lint as-is in parenthesis rather than ignoring them
Catches a couple new FPs with mixed operator precedences and `as` casts
```rust
// such as
0 + { a } * 2;
0 + a as usize;
```
The suggestions are now applied using `span_lint_and_sugg` rather than appearing in just the message and have a `run-rustfix` test
Rustup
`@rust-lang/clippy,` `@Jarcho,` `@dswij,` `@Alexendoo.` Could someone review this? It should be pretty straight forward since it's just a sync. I think it's also fine if either one of `@Jarcho,` `@dswij,` `@Alexendoo` approves this, as these are usually not reviewed. I just want to make sure that I didn't break something obvious 🙃
It should be enough to look at the merge commit 🙃
changelog: none
changelog: move [`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`] to `suspicious`
[dbg_macro] tolerates use of `dbg!` in items which have `#[cfg(test)]` attribute
fix: #8758
changelog: [dbg_macro] tolerates use of `dbg!` in items with `#[cfg(test)]` attribute
