5b1a4c0d76
Fix `manual_range_contains` false negative with chains of `&&` and `||`
Fixes #8745
Since the precedence for `&&` is the same as itself the HIR for a chain of `&&` ends up with a right skewed tree like:
```
&&
/ \
&& c2
/ \
... c1
```
So only the leftmost `&&` was actually "fully" checked, the top level was just `c2` and `&&` so the `manual_range_contains` lint won't apply. This change makes it also check `c2` with `c1`.
There's a bit of a hacky solution in the [second commit](257f09776a) to check if the number of open/closing parens in the snippet match. This is to prevent a case like `((x % 2 == 0) || (x < 0)) || (x >= 10)` from offering a suggestion like `((x % 2 == 0) || !(0..10).contains(&x)` which now won't compile.
Any suggestions for that paren hack welcome, kinda new to working on this so not too sure about possible solutions :) it's weird because I don't know how else to check for parens in HIR considering they're removed when lowering AST.
changelog: Fix [`manual_range_contains`] false negative with chains of `&&` and `||`