add unqualified_local_imports lint
This lint helps deal with https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4709 by having the compiler detect imports of local items that are not syntactically distinguishable from imports from other cates. Making them syntactically distinguishable ensures rustfmt can consistently apply the desired import grouping.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #129201 (std: implement the `random` feature (alternative version))
- #130536 (bootstrap: Set the dylib path when building books with rustdoc)
- #130551 (Fix `break_last_token`.)
- #130657 (Remove x86_64-fuchsia and aarch64-fuchsia target aliases)
- #130721 (Add more test cases for block-no-opening-brace)
- #130736 (Add rustfmt 2024 reformatting to git blame ignore)
- #130746 (readd `@tgross35` and `@joboet` to the review rotation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add rustfmt 2024 reformatting to git blame ignore
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130724 essentially reformatted the world, so we should add it to the git blame ignore list.
Tested with `git blame compiler/rustc_abi/src/lib.rs -L1137,1146`. I first thought that I have to ignore the merge commit, but it seems like the actual commit that did the reformatting should be ignored instead.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Fix `break_last_token`.
It currently doesn't handle the three-char tokens `>>=` and `<<=` correctly. These can be broken twice, resulting in three individual tokens. This is a latent bug that currently doesn't cause any problems, but does cause problems for #124141, because that PR increases the usage of lazy token streams.
r? `@petrochenkov`
bootstrap: Set the dylib path when building books with rustdoc
The library path is needed when the toolchain has been configured with
`[rust] rpath = false`. Otherwise, building the reference book will get
an error when it tries to run rustdoc, like:
rustdoc: error while loading shared libraries: librustc_driver-2ec457c3b8826b72.so
std: implement the `random` feature (alternative version)
Implements the ACP rust-lang/libs-team#393.
This PR is an alternative version of #129120 that replaces `getentropy` with `CCRandomGenerateBytes` (on macOS) and `arc4random_buf` (other BSDs), since that function is not suited for generating large amounts of data and should only be used to seed other CPRNGs. `CCRandomGenerateBytes`/`arc4random_buf` on the other hand is (on modern platforms) just as secure and uses its own, very strong CPRNG (ChaCha20 on the BSDs, AES on macOS) periodically seeded with `getentropy`.
Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift
The main highlight this time is a fix for a miscompilation of RwLock on macOS. Also a Cranelift update and a couple of extra vendor intrinsics on arm64.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
Update to LLVM 19.1.0
This is a branch rebase of the submodule, now that LLVM 19.1.0 is final.
Our *only* extra patch right now is the one we're carrying for SGX unwind.
Apply `EarlyOtherwiseBranch` to scalar value
In the future, I'm thinking of hoisting discriminant via GVN so that we only need to write very little code here.
r? `@cjgillot`
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #129550 (Add str.as_str() for easy Deref to string slices)
- #130344 (Handle unsized consts with type `str` in v0 symbol mangling)
- #130659 (Support `char::encode_utf16` in const scenarios.)
- #130705 (No longer mark RTN as incomplete)
- #130712 (Don't call `ty::Const::normalize` in error reporting)
- #130713 (Mark `u8::make_ascii_uppercase` and `u8::make_ascii_lowercase` as const.)
- #130714 (Introduce `structurally_normalize_const`, use it in `rustc_hir_typeck`)
- #130715 (Replace calls to `ty::Const::{try_}eval` in mir build/pattern analysis)
- #130723 (Add test for `available_parallelism()`)
- #130726 (tests: Remove spuriously failing vec-tryinto-array codegen test)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
tests: Remove spuriously failing vec-tryinto-array codegen test
This has failed more than a couple of times now. It costs real time, money, and energy to deal with this, far more than this test is saving us.
Add test for `available_parallelism()`
This is a redo of [this PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104095).
I changed the location of the test as per comments in the original thread. Otherwise the test is practically the same.
try-job: test-various
Replace calls to `ty::Const::{try_}eval` in mir build/pattern analysis
We normalize consts in writeback: #130645. This means that consts are gonna be as normalized as they're ever gonna get in MIR building and pattern analysis. Therefore we can just use `try_to_target_usize` rather than calling `eval_target_usize`.
Regarding the `.expect` calls, I'm not totally certain whether they're correct given rigid unevaluated consts. But this PR shouldn't make *more* ICEs occur; we may have to squash these ICEs when mGCE comes around, tho 😺
Introduce `structurally_normalize_const`, use it in `rustc_hir_typeck`
Introduces `structurally_normalize_const` to typecking to separate the "eval a const" step from the "try to turn a valtree into a target usize" in HIR typeck, where we may still have infer vars and stuff around.
I also changed `check_expr_repeat` to move a double evaluation of a const into a single one. I'll leave inline comments.
r? ```@BoxyUwU```
I hesitated to really test this on the new solver where it probably matters for unevaluated consts. If you're worried about the side-effects, I'd be happy to craft some more tests 😄
Mark `u8::make_ascii_uppercase` and `u8::make_ascii_lowercase` as const.
Relevant tracking issue: #130698
This PR extends #130697 by also marking the `make_ascii_uppercase` and `make_ascii_lowercase` methods in `u8` as const.
The `const_char_make_ascii` feature gate is additionally renamed to `const_make_ascii`.
Don't call `ty::Const::normalize` in error reporting
We do this to ensure that trait refs with unevaluated consts have those consts simplified to their evaluated forms. Instead, use `try_normalize_erasing_regions`.
**NOTE:** This has the side-effect of erasing regions from all of our trait refs. If this is too much to review or you think it's too opinionated of a diagnostics change, then I could split out the effective change (i.e. erasing regions from this impl suggestion) into another PR and have someone else review it.
