NLL: Fix bug in associated constant type annotations.
Fixes#57280.
This PR reverses the variance used when relating types from the type
annotation of an associated constant - this matches the behaviour of the
lexical borrow checker and fixes a bug whereby matching a `&'a str`
against a `&'static str` would produce an error.
r? @nikomatsakis
Bump stage0
Updates stage 0
From: rustc 1.32.0-beta.2 (a01e4761a 2018-12-08)
To: rustc 1.32.0-beta.11 (e64fee6a3 2019-01-04)
Intended to pull in #57292 which will fix#57142.
The following is a list of PRs this also pulls in in case anyone is interested in seeing the changes:
#56930#56961#57236#57305
tests: Do not use `-Z parse-only`, continue compilation to test recovery
Make tests closer to reality!
The next step will be enabling `-Z continue-parse-after-error` by default and looking at the regressions.
A few instances of `-Z parse-only` are kept when it's appropriate, see e.g `ui/impl-trait/impl-trait-plus-priority.rs`, which tests mostly semantically wrong code and would generate too much useless noise if allowed to continue.
Make sure feature gate errors are recoverable (take 2)
Continuation of 15cefe4b2a.
Turns out I missed the most important part - the main feature gate checking pass.
flock: Use fcntl constants directly from libc crate on Unix targets
Since the values for the fcntl constants can vary from architecture
to architecture, it is better to use the values defined in the libc
crate instead of assigning literals in the flock code which would
make the assumption that all architectures use the same values.
Fixes#57007
Since the values for the fcntl constants can vary from architecture
to architecture, it is better to use the values defined in the libc
crate instead of assigning literals in the flock code which would
make the assumption that all architectures use the same values.
Fixes#57007
use structured suggestion for method calls
Furthermore, don't suggest calling the method if it is part of a place
expression, as this is invalid syntax.
I'm thinking it might be worth putting a label on the method assignment span like "this is a method" and removing the span from the "methods are immutable" text so it isn't reported twice.
The suggestions in `src/test/ui/did_you_mean/issue-40396.stderr` are suboptimal. I could check if the containing expression is `BinOp`, but I'm not sure if that's general enough. Any ideas?
r? @estebank
rustc: Fix regression where jemalloc isn't used
In #56986 the linkage of jemalloc to the compiler was switched from the
driver library to the rustc binary to ensure that only rustc itself uses
jemalloc. In doing so, however, it turns out jemalloc wasn't actually
linked in at all! None of the symbols were referenced so the static
library wasn't used. This means that jemalloc wasn't pulled in at all.
This commit performs a bit of a dance to reference jemalloc symbols,
attempting to pull it in despite LLVM's optimizations.
Closes#57115
bootstrap: Link LLVM as a dylib with ThinLTO (take 2)
When building a distributed compiler on Linux where we use ThinLTO to
create the LLVM shared object this commit switches the compiler to
dynamically linking that LLVM artifact instead of statically linking to
LLVM. The primary goal here is to reduce CI compile times, avoiding two+
ThinLTO builds of all of LLVM. By linking dynamically to LLVM we'll
reuse the one ThinLTO step done by LLVM's build itself.
Lots of discussion about this change can be found [here] and down. A
perf run will show whether this is worth it or not!
[here]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53245#issuecomment-417015334
---
This PR previously landed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56944, caused https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57111, and was reverted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57116. I've added one more commit here which should fix the breakage that we saw.
Calculate privacy access only via query
Initially converted to query in a9f6babcda and then changed to respect dependencies 8281e883dd.
I did this as an effort to prune `CrateAnalysis` from librustc_save_analysis, with the only thing remaining being the glob map (`name` is unused, existing `crate_name` is exposed in the compiler passes, instead).
Since calculating the glob map is opt-in, it'd be great if we could calculate that on-demand. However, it seems that it'd require converting resolution to queries, which I'm not sure how to do yet.
In an effort to get rid of `CrateAnalysis` altogether, could we try unconditionally calculating the glob_map in the resolver, thus completely removing `CrateAnalysis` struct, and doing a perf run?
r? @nikomatsakis
cc @petrochenkov do you have any idea how/if at all could we querify the resolver? I've stumbled upon a comment that's ~3? years old at the moment, so I'm guessing things might have changed and it actually may be feasible now. fe0c10019d/src/librustc_driver/driver.rs (L589-L593)
librustc_mir: Make qualify_min_const_fn module public
Trying to write a `const_fn` lint for Clippy. @oli-obk suggested
[here][link] to use the `is_min_const_fn` function from the
`qualify_min_const_fn` module. However, the module is currently private
and this commit makes it public.
I lack any historical knowledge of the development of the `const_fn`
feature, so I'm not sure if it was private on purpose or not. fwiw, all
modules are already public except `qualify_min_const_fn`.
r? @oli-obk
[link]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2440#issuecomment-446109978
rustdoc: force binary filename for compiled doctests
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57317, needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/issues/1137
Right now, when building a doctest, rustdoc provides the compiler an output directory (a temp dir) but lets the compiler name the executable. If the doctest needs to be executed, it then tries to run a binary named `rust_out` from that directory. For the most part, this works fine. However, if the doctest sets its own crate name, the compiler uses that name for the output binary instead. This causes rustdoc to try to execute a nonexistent binary, causing the test to fail.
This PR changes the paths rustdoc gives to the compiler when building doctests to force the output *filename* instead of just the *directory*.
Improve Box<T> -> Pin<Box<T>> conversion
I found the `From` trait conversion for this very hard to find, having a named function for it is much more discoverable. Also fixes#56256 as I need that in the place I'm using this.
Has a placeholder tracking issue, will file an issue once I get feedback.
`const fn` is no longer coming soon (const keyword docs)
The `const` keyword [documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/keyword.const.html) mentions that `const fn`s are coming soon, but they have already been added.
VaList::copy should not require a mutable ref
`VaList::copy` does not need to take a mutable reference. The `va_copy`
intrinsic takes a immutable reference.
Fix 'be be' constructs
I noticed a duplicated "be" somewhere in the code. A search for it
manifested a couple more locations with the same problem. This change
removes one of the "be"s.
Rename and fix nolink-with-link-args test
There are three problems with the nolink-with-link-args test:
* The test fails when using MSVC. It's caused by the `linker-flavor=ld` flag which was added in #46291.
* In its comment, this test tests that "link_args are indeed passed when nolink is specified", but the `nolink` attribute has been removed [a long time ago](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/12826).
* Pattern has a small typo.
At first I was going to completely remove this test, but there is [a closed pull request for that](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/21090).
So:
* rename the file as suggested in the closed PR
* adjust the comment
* fix typo in the pattern
* add `ignore-msvc`.
r? @alexcrichton
Fix#56806 by using `delay_span_bug` in object safety layout sanity checks
It's possible that `is_object_safe` is called on a trait method that with an invalid receiver type. This caused an ICE in #56806, because `receiver_is_dispatchable` returns `true` for `self: Box<dyn Trait>`, which causes one of the layout sanity checks in object_safety.rs to fail. Replacing `bug!` with `delay_span_bug` solves this.
The fact that `receiver_is_dispatchable` returns `true` here could be considered a bug. It passes the check that the method implements, though: `Box<dyn Trait>` implements `DispatchFromDyn<Box<dyn Trait>>` because `dyn Trait` implements `Unsize<dyn Trait>`. It would be good to hear what @eddyb and @nikomatsakis think.
Note that I only added a test for the case encountered in #56806. I could not come up with a case that triggered an ICE from the other check, `bug!("receiver when Self = dyn Trait should be ScalarPair, found Scalar")`. There is no way, to my knowledge, that you can make `receiver_is_dispatchable` return true but still have a `Scalar` ABI when `Self = dyn Trait`.
One other case I encountered while debugging #56806 was that if you have a type parameter `T` that implements `Deref<Target=Self>` and `DispatchFromDyn<T>`, and use it as a method receiver, it will cause an ICE during `is_object_safe` because `T` has no layout ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=d9b7497b3be0ca8382fa7d9497263214)):
```rust
trait Trait<T: Deref<Target=Self> + DispatchFromDyn<T>> {
fn foo(self: T) -> dyn Trait<T>;
}
```
I don't intend to remove the ICE there because it is a pathological case, especially since there is no way to implement `DispatchFromDyn<T>` for `T` — the checks in typeck/coherence/builtin.rs do not allow that.
fixes#56806
r? @varkor
panic when calling MaybeUninhabited::into_inner on uninhabited type
I do this by adding an internal-only intrinsic `panic_if_uninhabited`. I have no idea what I am doing here, just mindlessly copying code around, so please review carefully!
NLL: Add closure cannot be moved note.
Fixes#57098.
This PR extends existing logic for checking whether a closure that
is `FnOnce` and therefore moves variables that it captures from the
environment has already been invoked when being invoked again.
Now, this logic will also check whether the closure is being moved after
previously being moved or invoked and add an appropriate note.
r? @pnkfelix
