8799: Add basic support for array lengths in types r=flodiebold a=lf-
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
This recognizes `let a = [1u8, 2, 3]` as having type `[u8; 3]` instead
of the previous `[u8; _]`. Byte strings and `[0u8; 2]` kinds of range
array declarations are unsupported as before.
I don't know why a bunch of our rustc tests had single quotes inside
strings un-escaped by `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo t`, but I don't think it's
bad? Maybe something in a nightly?
8745: Support goto_type_definition for types r=matklad a=Veykril
I'm unsure if the approach of lowering an `ast::Type` to a `hir::Type` is a good idea, it seems fine to me at least.
Fixes#2882
Co-authored-by: Lukas Tobias Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
8674: fix for #8664: Emit folding ranges for multi-line where clauses r=matklad a=m5tfi
#8664
I added a test that assert folding multi-line where clauses while leaving single lined one. Please, let me know if the code needs further improvements.
Co-authored-by: m5tfi <72708423+m5tfi@users.noreply.github.com>
Attempting to rename an element of a tuple field would previously
replace the type with the new name, which doesn't make sense; now it
fails instead.
The check is done in both `prepare_rename` and `rename` so that the case
is caught before the user is prompted for a new name. Some other
existing failure cases are also now additionally checked in
`prepare_rename`.
8540: Prevent being able to rename items that are not part of the workspace r=Veykril a=Veykril
This change causes renames that happen on items coming from crates outside the workspace to fail. I believe this should be the right approach, but usage of cargo's workspace might not be entirely correct for preventing these kinds of refactoring from touching things they shouldn't. I'm not entirely sure?
cc #6623, this is one of the bigger footguns when it comes to refactoring, especially in combination with import aliases people tend to rename items coming from a crates dependency which this prevents.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
