Handle write!(buf, "\n") case better
Make `write!(buf, "\n")` suggest `writeln!(buf)` by removing
the trailing comma from `writeln!(buf, )`.
changelog: [`write_with_newline`] suggestion on only "\n" improved
Make `write!(buf, "\n")` suggest `writeln!(buf)` by removing
the trailing comma from `writeln!(buf, )`.
changelog: [`write_with_newline`] suggestion on only "\n" improved
It relaxes rules for `to_*` variant, so it doesn't lint in trait definitions
and implementations anymore.
Although, non-`Copy` type implementing trait's `to_*` method taking
`self` feels not good (consumes ownership, so should be rather named `into_`), it would be better if this case was a pedantic lint (allow-by-default) instead.
Refactor: arrange lints in misc_early module
This PR arranges misc_early lints so that they can be accessed more easily.
Basically, I refactored them following the instruction described in #6680.
cc: `@Y-Nak,` `@flip1995,` `@magurotuna`
changelog: Move lints in misc_early module into their own modules.
Fix stack overflow issue in `redundant_pattern_matching`
Fixes#7169
~~cc `@Jarcho` Since tomorrow is release day and we need to get this also fixed in beta, I'll just revert the PR instead of looking into the root issue. Your changes are good, so if you have an idea what could cause this stack overflow and know how to fix it, please open a PR that reverts this revert with a fix.~~
r? `@llogiq`
changelog: none (fixes stack overflow, but this was introduced in this release cycle)
needless_collect: Lint cases with type annotations for indirect usage and recognize `BinaryHeap`
fixes#7110
changelog: needless_collect: Lint cases with type annotations for indirect usage and recognize `BinaryHeap`.
Producing a good suggestion for this lint is already hard when no macros
are involved. With macros the lint message and the suggestion are just
confusing. Since both, producing a good suggestion and figuring out if
this pattern can be re-written inside a macro is nearly impossible, just
bail out.
[single_char_pattern] add strip_prefix and strip_suffix
Title says it all. Adjusted ui tests.
I added the second commit in case you don't like that I moved that table into `single_char_pattern.rs` directly. I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be in that file. It isn't used anywhere else.
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: add strip_prefix and strip_suffix to single_char_pattern lint
while_immutable_cond: check condition for mutation
This fixes#6689 by also checking the bindings mutated in the condition, whereas it was previously only checked in the loop body.
---
changelog: Fix FP in [`while_immutable_cond`] where mutation in the loop variable wasn't picked up.
`implicit_return` improvements
fixes: #6940
changelog: Fix `implicit_return` suggestion for async functions
changelog: Improve `implicit_return` suggestions when returning the result of a macro
changelog: Check for `break` expressions inside a loop which are then implicitly returned
changelog: Allow all diverging functions in `implicit_return`, not just panic functions
Remove leftover plugin conf_file code
changelog: none
Removes dead code that used to support the following syntax:
```rust
#![plugin(clippy(conf_file="path/to/clippy's/configuration"))]
```
RLS (and others?) will need to remove the `&[]` from `clippy_lints::read_conf(&[], sess)`.
r? `@flip1995`
Don't rebuild rustdoc and clippy after checking bootstrap
This works by unconditionally passing -Z unstable-options to the
compiler. This has no affect in practice since bootstrap doesn't use
`deny(rustc::internal)`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82461.
r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'index out of bounds: the len is 0 but the index is 0', src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/matches.rs:1595:53
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
I don't have a minimised testcase because I don't have time to reduce libstd down to a few lines right now.
Fix FN in `iter_cloned_collect` with a large array
fixes#6808
changelog: Fix FN in `iter_cloned_collect` with a large array
I spotted that [is_iterable_array](a362a4d1d0/clippy_lints/src/loops/explicit_iter_loop.rs (L67-L75)) function that `explicit_iter_loop` lint is using only works for array sizes <= 32.
There is this comment:
> IntoIterator is currently only implemented for array sizes <= 32 in rustc
I'm a bit confused, because I read that [IntoIterator for arrays](https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/core/array/mod.rs.html#194-201) with const generic `N` is stable since = "1.0.0". Although Const Generics MVP were stabilized in Rust 1.51.
Should I set MSRV for the current change? I will try to test with older compilers soon.
manual_unwrap_or: fix invalid code suggestion, due to macro expansion
fixes#6965
changelog: fix invalid code suggestion in `manual_unwrap_or` lint, due to macro expansion
extend `single_element_loop` to match `.iter()`
This extends `single_element_loop` to also match `[..].iter()` in the loop argument. Related to #7125, but not completely fixing it due to the lint only firing if the array expression contains a local variable.
---
changelog: none
`single_component_path_imports`: ignore `pub(crate) use some_macro;`
Fixes#7106
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Ignore exporting a macro within a crate using `pub(crate) use some_macro;` for [`single_component_path_imports`]
Unused io amount detects `.read().ok()?`
fixes#7096
changelog: unused_io_amount now detect expertion like `.read().ok()?`, `.read().or_else(|err| ...)?` and similar expressions.
Better suggestions when returning macro calls.
Suggest changeing all the break expressions in a loop, not just the final statement.
Don't lint divergent functions.
Don't suggest returning the result of any divergent fuction.
Switch transmute_ptr_to_ptr to "pedantic" class.
Per discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6372, this lint has significant false positives.
changelog: transmute_ptr_to_ptr defaults to "allow".
Add lint to check for boolean comparison in assert macro calls
This PR adds a lint to check if an assert macro is using a boolean as "comparison value". For example:
```rust
assert_eq!("a".is_empty(), false);
```
Could be rewritten as:
```rust
assert!(!"a".is_empty());
```
PS: The dev guidelines are amazing. Thanks a lot for writing them!
changelog: Add `bool_assert_comparison` lint
useless use of format! should return function directly
fixes#7066
changelog: [`useless_format`] wraps the content in the braces when it's needed.
r? `@giraffate`
Allow allman style braces in `suspicious_else_formatting`
fixes: #3864
Indentation checks could be added as well, but the lint already doesn't check for it.
changelog: Allow allman style braces in `suspicious_else_formatting`
Fixing FPs for the `branches_sharing_code` lint
Fixes#7053Fixes#7054
And an additional CSS adjustment to support dark mode for every inline code. It currently only works in paragraphs, which was an oversight on my part 😅. [Current Example](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#blacklisted_name)
This also includes ~50 lines of doc comments and is therefor not as big as the changes would indicate. 🐧
---
changelog: none
All of these bugs were introduced in this dev version and are therefor not worth a change log entry.
r? `@phansch`
cc: `@camsteffen` since you have a pretty good overview of the `SpanlessEq` implementation 🙃
Add `cloned_instead_of_copied` lint
Don't go cloning all willy-nilly.
Featuring a new `get_iterator_item_ty` util!
changelog: Add cloned_instead_of_copied lint
Closes#3870
Fix: redundant_pattern_matching drop order
Fixes#5746
A note about the change in drop order is added when the scrutinee (or any temporary in the expression) isn't known to be safe to drop in any order (i.e. doesn't implement the `Drop` trait, or contain such a type). There is a whitelist for some `std` types, but it's incomplete. Currently just `Vec<_>`, `Box<_>`, `Rc<_>` and `Arc<_>`, but only if the contained type is also safe to drop in any order.
Another lint for when the drop order changes could be added as allowed by default, but the drop order requirement is pretty subtle in this case. I think the note added to the lint should be enough to make someone think before applying the change.
changelog: Added a note to `redundant_pattern_matching` when the change in drop order might matter
Improve `map_entry` suggestion
fixes: #5176fixes: #4674fixes: #4664fixes: #1450
Still need to handle the value returned by `insert` correctly.
changelog: Improve `map_entry` suggestion. Will now suggest `or_insert`, `insert_with` or `match _.entry(_)` as appopriate.
changelog: Fix `map_entry` false positives where the entry api can't be used. e.g. when the map is used for multiple things.
Don't allow adjustments for `manual_map`
fixes: #7077
The other option here would be to add the return type to the closure. It would be fine for simple types, but longer types can be rather unwieldy. Could also implement the adjustment manually.
changelog: Don't lint `manual_map` when type adjustments are added. e.g. autoderef
Remove `match_path` and `match_qpath`
The only remaining usage is the `author` lint, so the functions are left in for now. The test result for `repl_uninit` changed, the lint was broken before.
The `collapsible_span_lint_calls` and `match_type_on_diag_item` tests have been changed. Both lints were broken when utils was extracted into it's own crate. `match_type_on_diag_item` isn't quite fixed, but it's at least less broken.
changelog: None
Fix false positives where the map is used before inserting into the map.
Fix false positives where two insertions happen.
Suggest using `if let Entry::Vacant(e) = _.entry(_)` when `or_insert` might be a semantic change
tabs_in_doc_comments: Fix ICE due to char indexing
This is a quick-fix for an ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`. The problem
was that we we're indexing into possibly multi-byte characters, such as '位'.
More specifically `get_chunks_of_tabs` was returning indices into
multi-byte characters. Those were passed on to a `Span` creation that
then caused the ICE.
This fix makes sure that we don't return indices that point inside a
multi-byte character. *However*, we are still iterating over unicode
codepoints, not grapheme clusters. So a seemingly single character like y̆ ,
which actually consists of two codepoints, will probably still cause
incorrect spans in the output. But I don't think we handle those cases
anywhere in Clippy currently?
Fixes#5835
changelog: Fix ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`
Fix a FP in `missing_const_for_fn`
where a function that calls a standard library function whose constness
is unstable is considered as being able to be a const function. Fixes#5995.
The core change is the move from `rustc_mir::const_eval::is_min_const_fn` to `rustc_mir::const_eval::is_const_fn`. I'm not clear about the difference in their purpose between them so I'm not sure if it's acceptable to call `qualify_min_const_fn::is_min_const_fn` this way now.
---
changelog: `missing_const_for_fn`: No longer lints when an unstably const function is called
Fix FP in `wrong_self_convention` lint
Previously, this lint didn't check into impl block when it was implementing a trait.
Recent improvements (#6924) have moved this check and some impl blocks are now checked but they shouldn't, such as in #7032.
Fixes#7032
changelog: Fix FP when not taking `self` in impl block for `wrong_self_convention` lint
Add a note on the issue #5953
Hello,
I thought it would be better to have a note and warning about this issue considering it introduced an UB in the past even with the "Search on Github" feature.
---
changelog: Add a note on the issue #5953 to the known problems section.
Deprecate `filter_map`
Since #6591, `filter_map` does not even lint `filter().map()`. The cases that are still linted make no sense IMO. So this just removes/deprecates it.
changelog: Deprecate `filter_map` lint
Closes#3424Fixes#7050
Fix FP in `single_component_path_imports` lint
Fix FP in `single_component_path_imports` lint when the import is reused with `self`, like in `use self::module`.
Fixes#5210
changelog: none
Invalid null usage v2
This is continuation of #6192 after inactivity.
I plan to move paths into the compiler as diagnostic items after this is merged.
fixes#1703
changelog: none
consider mutability on useless_vec suggestions
fixes#7035
changelog: Now the suggested by `useless_vec` considers mutability to suggest either `&[]`, as before, or `&mut []` if the used reference is mutable.
This is a quick-fix for an ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`. The problem
was that we we're indexing into possibly multi-byte characters, such as '位'.
More specifically `get_chunks_of_tabs` was returning indices into
multi-byte characters. Those were passed on to a `Span` creation that
then caused the ICE.
This fix makes sure that we don't return indices that point inside a
multi-byte character. *However*, we are still iterating over unicode
codepoints, not grapheme clusters. So a seemingly single character like y̆ ,
which actually consists of two codepoints, will probably still cause
incorrect spans in the output.
Don't trigger `same_item_push` if the vec is used in the loop body
fixes#6987
changelog: `same_item_push`: Don't trigger if the `vec` is used in the loop body
fix `missing_panics_doc` not detecting `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!`
fixes#6997
changelog: `missing_panics_doc` detects `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!`
---
searching for `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!` in `FindPanicUnwrap`
New Lint: `branches_sharing_code`
This lint checks if all `if`-blocks contain some statements that are the same and can be moved out of the blocks to prevent code duplication. Here is an example:
```rust
let _ = if ... {
println!("Start"); // <-- Lint for code duplication
let _a = 99;
println!("End"); // <-- Lint for code duplication
false
} else {
println!("Start");
let _b = 17;
println!("End");
false
};
```
This could be written as:
```rust
println!("Start");
let _ = if ... {
let _a = 99;
false
} else {
let _b = 17;
false
};
println!("End");
```
---
This lint will get masked by the `IF_SAME_THEN_ELSE` lint. I think it makes more sense to only emit one lint per if block. This means that the folloing example:
```rust
if ... {
let _a = 17;
} else {
let _a = 17;
}
```
Will only trigger the `IF_SAME_THEN_ELSE` lint and not the `SHARED_CODE_IN_IF_BLOCKS` lint.
---
closes: #5234
changelog: Added a new lint: `branches_sharing_code`
And hello to the one that is writing the changelog for this release :D
Remove author requirement for `cargo_common_metadata`
This PR follows https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/9282, I'm not fully informed about all of this, it would be great if somebody knowledgeable about this topic agrees.
changelog: Changed `cargo_common_metadata` to stop linting on the optional author field.
* Added expression check for shared_code_in_if_blocks
* Finishing touches for the shared_code_in_if_blocks lint
* Applying PR suggestions
* Update lints yay
* Moved test into subfolder
Fix `redundant_clone` fp
fixes: #5973fixes: #5595fixes: #6998
changelog: Fix `redundant_clone` fp where the cloned value is modified while the clone is in use.
Lint: filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
Fixes#6061
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog:
* add new lint for filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
First Rust PR, so I'm sure I've violated some idioms. Happy to change anything.
I'm getting one test failure locally -- a stderr diff for `compile_test`. I'm having a hard time seeing how I could be causing it, so I'm tentatively opening this in the hopes that it's an artifact of my local setup against `rustc`. Hoping it can at least still be reviewed in the meantime.
I'm gathering that since this is a method lint, and `.filter(...).map(...)` is already checked, the means of implementation needs to be a little different, so I didn't exactly follow the setup boilerplate. My way of checking for method calls seems a little too direct (ie, "is the second element of the expression literally the path for `Option::is_some`?"), but it seems like that's how some other lints work, so I went with it. I'm assuming we're not concerned about, eg, closures that just end up equivalent to `Option::is_some` by eta reduction.
disable upper_case_acronyms for pub items - enum edition
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6803 (again... 😅 )
My previous fix did not work for enums because enum variants were checked separately in the `check_variant` function but it looks like we can't use that because we can't tell if the enum the variants belong to is declared as public or not (it always said `Inherited` for me)
I went and special-cased enums and iterated over all the variants "manually", but only, if the enums is not public.
---
changelog: fix upper_case_acronyms still firing on public enums (#6803)
Refactor types
r? `@flip1995`
This is the last PR to close#6724🎉
Also, this fixes#6936.
changelog: `vec_box`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
changelog: `linkedlist`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
changelog: `option_option`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
Improve `clone_on_copy`
This also removes the `clone_on_copy_mut` test as the same thing is covered in the `clone_on_copy` test.
changelog: `copy_on_clone` lint on chained method calls taking self by value
changelog: `copy_on_clone` only lint when using the `Clone` trait
changelog: `copy_on_clone` correct suggestion when the cloned value is a macro call.
Lint on `_.clone().method()` when method takes self by value
Set applicability correctly
Correct suggestion when the cloned value is a macro call. e.g. `m!(x).clone()`
Don't lint when not using the `Clone` trait
Improve `expl_impl_clone_on_copy`
fixes: #1254
changelog: Check to see if the generic constraints are the same as if using derive for `expl_impl_clone_on_copy`
Found with https://github.com/est31/warnalyzer.
Dubious changes:
- Is anyone else using rustc_apfloat? I feel weird completely deleting
x87 support.
- Maybe some of the dead code in rustc_data_structures, in case someone
wants to use it in the future?
- Don't change rustc_serialize
I plan to scrap most of the json module in the near future (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/418) and fixing the
tests needed more work than I expected.
TODO: check if any of the comments on the deleted code should be kept.
