FP fix and documentation for `branches_sharing_code` lint
Closesrust-lang/rust-clippy#7369
Related rust-lang/rust-clippy#7452 I'm still thinking about the best way to fix this. I could simply add another visitor to ensure that the moved expressions don't modify values being used in the condition, but I'm not totally happy with this due to the complexity. I therefore only documented it for now
changelog: [`branches_sharing_code`] fixed false positive where block expressions would sometimes be ignored.
Fix internal `default_hash_types` lint to use resolved path
I run into false positives now and then (mostly in Clippy) when I want to name some util after HashMap.
Don't suggest doc(hidden) or unstable variants in wildcard lint
Clippy's wildcard lint would suggest doc(hidden) and unstable variants for non_exhaustive enums, even though those aren't part of the public interface (yet) and should only be matched on using a `_`, just like potential future additions to the enum. There was already some logic to exclude a *single* doc(hidden) variant. This extends that to all hidden variants, and also hides `#[unstable]` variants.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/85746#issuecomment-868886893
This PR includes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7406 as the first commit.
Here's the diff that this PR adds on top of that PR: https://github.com/m-ou-se/rust-clippy/compare/std-errorkind...m-ou-se:doc-hidden-variants
---
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: No longer suggest unstable and doc(hidden) variants in wildcard lint. wildcard_enum_match_arm, match_wildcard_for_single_variants
This fixes a bug where match_wildcard_for_single_variants produced a
bad suggestion where besides the missing variant, one or more hidden
variants were left.
This also adds tests to the ui-tests match_wildcard_for_single_variants
and wildcard_enum_match_arm to make sure that the correct suggestion is
produced.
New lint: `disallowed_script_idents`
This PR implements a new lint to restrict locales that can be used in the code,
as proposed in #7376.
Current concerns / unresolved questions:
- ~~Mixed usage of `script` (as a Unicode term) and `locale` (as something that is easier to understand for the broad audience). I'm not sure whether these terms are fully interchangeable and whether in the current form it is more confusing than helpful.~~ `script` is now used everywhere.
- ~~Having to mostly copy-paste `AllowedScript`. Probably it's not a big problem, as the list of scripts is standardized and is unlikely to change, and even if we'd stick to the `unicode_script::Script`, we'll still have to implement custom deserialization, and I don't think that it will be shorter in terms of the amount of LoC.~~ `unicode::Script` is used together with a filtering deserialize function.
- Should we stick to the list of "recommended scripts" from [UAX #31](http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr31/#Table_Recommended_Scripts) in the configuration?
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: ``[`disallowed_script_idents`]``
r? `@Manishearth`
Improve lint message for match-same-arms lint
fixes#7331
Follow-up to #7377
This PR improves the lint message for `match-same-arms` lint and adds `todo!(..)` example to the lint docs.
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: None
Do not spawn blacklisted_name lint in test context
---
fixed#7305
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: `blacklisted_name` lint is not spawned in the test context anymore.
