... objects
For method calls through trait objects, we currently generate the llvm
function argument attributes using the non-opaque method signature that
still has the trait object fat pointer for the self pointer. This leads
to attributes that are plain wrong, e.g. noalias. As we don't know
anything about the concrete type of the underlying object, we must
replace the self argument with an opaque i8 pointer before applying the
attributes.
this is the same problem as openbsd (#22792).
without the patch, liblibc don't build.
@mneumann please comment.
I have encountered this problem while building some rust libs with `target=x86_64-unknown-dragonfly` (while working on #22794)
Check for unbounded recursion during dropck.
Such recursion can be introduced by the erroneous use of non-regular types (aka types employing polymorphic recursion), which Rust does not support.
Fix#22443
For method calls through trait objects, we currently generate the llvm
function argument attributes using the non-opaque method signature that
still has the trait object fat pointer for the self pointer. This leads
to attributes that are plain wrong, e.g. noalias. As we don't know
anything about the concrete type of the underlying object, we must
replace the self argument with an opaque i8 pointer before applying the
attributes.
Count recursion across phantom data separately from all recursion,
and treat `Box<T>` just as if it were carrying `PhantomData<T>`.
(Regression tests are in followup commit.)
The practical effect of this is just to increment the `xref_depth`
counter, the same way that `Vec` and other types carrying
`PhantomData` do.
static_assert is documented as working on static with type `bool`, but
we currently accept it on any const static and crash when the const has
an non-integral type.
This is a breaking-change for anyone who used static_assert on types
likes i32, which happened to work but seems like an unintended
consequence of the missing error checking.
[breaking-change]
Fixes#22056
some commits in OpenBSD OS have corrected a problem of stack position.
Now, we can adjust more accurately the page guard in rust.
@dhuseby I am not sure that bitrig have already integrated these changes (the `$OpenBSD$` header in sys/kern/kern_exec.c is too old). But when they do, you may want this patch too.
Fixing #21475. Right now this code can not be parsed:
```rust
use m::{START, END};
fn main() {
match 42u32 {
m::START...m::END => {}, // error: expected one of `::`, `=>`, or `|`, found `...`
_ => {},
}
}
mod m {
pub const START: u32 = 4;
pub const END: u32 = 14;
}
```
I fixed the parser and added test for this case, but now there are still problems with mixing literals and paths in interval:
```rust
match 42u32 {
0u32...m::END => {}, // mismatched types in range [E0031]
m::START...59u32 => {}, // mismatched types in range [E0031]
_ => {},
}
}
```
I'll try fix this problem and need review.
static_assert is documented as working on static with type `bool`, but
we currently accept it on any const static and crash when the const has
an non-integral type.
This is a breaking-change for anyone who used static_assert on types
likes i32, which happened to work but seems like an unintended
consequence of the missing error checking.
[breaking-change]
Fixes#22056
