Make #[cfg(bootstrap)] not error in proc macros on later stages
As was discovered in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1154697627,
adding #[cfg(bootstrap)] to a rust-internal proc macro crate
would yield an unexpected cfg name error, at least on later
stages wher the bootstrap cfg arg wasn't set.
rustc already passes arguments to mark bootstrap as expected,
however the means of delivery through the RUSTFLAGS env var
is unable to reach proc macro crates, as described
in the issue linked in the code this commit touches.
This wouldn't be an issue for cfg args that get passed through
RUSTFLAGS, as they would never become *active* either, so
any usage of one of these flags in a proc macro's code would
legitimately yield a lint warning. But since dc30258,
rust takes extra measures to pass --cfg=bootstrap even in
proc macros, by passing it via the wrapper. Thus, we need
to send the flags to mark bootstrap as expected also from the
wrapper, so that #[cfg(bootstrap)] also works from proc macros.
I want to thank `Urgau` and `jplatte` for helping me find the cause of this. ❤️
debuginfo: Fix NatVis for Rc and Arc with unsized pointees.
Currently, the NatVis for `Rc<T>` and `Arc<T>` does not support unsized `T`. For both `Rc<T>` and `Rc<dyn SomeTrait>` the visualizers fail:
```txt
[Reference count] : -> must be used on pointers and . on structures
[Weak reference count] : -> must be used on pointers and . on structures
```
This PR fixes the visualizers. For slices we can even give show the elements, so one now gets something like:
```txt
slice_rc : { len=3 }
[Length] : 3
[Reference count] : 41
[Weak reference count] : 2
[0] : 1
[1] : 2
[2] : 3
```
r? `@wesleywiser`
Entry and_modify doc
This PR modifies the documentation for [HashMap](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/struct.HashMap.html#) and [BTreeMap](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/struct.BTreeMap.html#) by introducing examples for `and_modify`. `and_modify` is a function that tends to give more idiomatic rust code when dealing with these data structures -- yet it lacked examples and was hidden away. This PR adds that and addresses #98122.
I've made some choices which I tried to explain in my commits. This is my first time contributing to rust, so hopefully, I made the right choices.
Support lint expectations for `--force-warn` lints (RFC 2383)
Rustc has a `--force-warn` flag, which overrides lint level attributes and forces the diagnostics to always be warn. This means, that for lint expectations, the diagnostic can't be suppressed as usual. This also means that the expectation would not be fulfilled, even if a lint had been triggered in the expected scope.
This PR now also tracks the expectation ID in the `ForceWarn` level. I've also made some minor adjustments, to possibly catch more bugs and make the whole implementation more robust.
This will probably conflict with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97718. That PR should ideally be reviewed and merged first. The conflict itself will be trivial to fix.
---
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc: `@flip1995` since you've helped with the initial review and also discussed this topic with me. 🙃
Follow-up of: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87835
Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549
Yeah, and that's it.
This simplifies things, but requires making `CacheEncoder` non-generic.
(This was previously merged as commit 4 in #94732 and then was reverted
in #97905 because it caused a perf regression.)
This commit removes the `a == b` early return, which isn't useful in
practice, and replaces it with one that helps matches with many ranges,
including char ranges.
The code is clearer and simpler without it. Note that the `a == b` early
return at the top of the function means the `a == b` test at the end of
the function could never succeed.
It's never executed when running the entire test suite. I think it's
because of the early return at the top of the function if `a.ty() != ty`
succeeds.
This is a performance win for `unicode-normalization`.
The commit also removes the closure, which isn't necessary. And
reformulates the comparison into a form I find easier to read.
The `MissingDoc` lint has quadratic behaviour when processing doc comments.
This is a problem for large doc comments (e.g. 1000+ lines) when
`deny(missing_code)` is enabled.
A 1000-line doc comment using `//!` comments is represented as 1000 attributes
on an item. The lint machinery iterates over each attribute with
`visit_attribute`. `MissingDoc`'s impl of that function calls
`with_lint_attrs`, which calls `enter_attrs`, which iterates over all 1000
attributes looking for a `doc(hidden)` attribute. I.e. for every attribute we
iterate over all the other attributes.
The fix is simple: don't call `with_lint_attrs` on attributes. This makes
sense: `with_lint_attrs` is intended to iterate over the attributes on a
language fragment like a statement or expression, but it doesn't need to
be called on attributes themselves.
Add regression test for #93775Closes#93775, also closes#93022 as it should have the same root cause
r? ```@compiler-errors```
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Refactor path segment parameter error
This PR attempts to rewrite the error handling for an unexpected parenthesised type parameters to:
- Use provided data instead of re-parsing the whole span
- Add a multipart suggestion to reflect on the changes with an underline
- Remove the unnecessary "if" nesting
Inline `const_eval_select`
To avoid circular link time dependency between core and compiler
builtins when building with `-Zshare-generics`.
r? ```@Amanieu```
Fix generic impl rustdoc json output
Fixes#97986.
The problem in case of generic trait impl is that the trait's items are the same for all the types afterward. But since they're the same, it's safe for rustdoc-json to just ignore them.
A little representation of what's going on:
```rust
trait T {
fn f(); // <- defid 0
}
impl<Y> T for Y {
fn f() {} // <- defid 1
}
struct S; // <- defid 1 (since it matches `impl<Y> T for Y`
```
cc ```@Urgau```
r? ```@CraftSpider```
Fix suggestions for `&a: T` parameters
I've accidentally discovered that we have broken suggestions for `&a: T` parameters:
```rust
fn f(&mut bar: u32) {}
fn main() {
let _ = |&mut a| ();
}
```
```text
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> ./t.rs:1:6
|
1 | fn f(&mut bar: u32) {}
| ^^^^^^^^-----
| | |
| | expected due to this
| expected `u32`, found `&mut _`
| help: did you mean `bar`: `&u32`
|
= note: expected type `u32`
found mutable reference `&mut _`
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> ./t.rs:4:23
|
4 | let _: fn(u32) = |&mut a| ();
| ^^^^^--
| | |
| | expected due to this
| expected `u32`, found `&mut _`
| help: did you mean `a`: `&u32`
|
= note: expected type `u32`
found mutable reference `&mut _`
```
It's hard to see, but
1. The help span is overlapping with "expected" spans
2. It suggests `fn f( &u32) {}` (no `mut` and lost parameter name) and `|&u32 ()` (no closing `|` and lost parameter name)
I've tried to fix this.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
os str capacity documentation
This is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95394 , with expansion and consolidation
to address comments from `@dtolnay` and other `@rust-lang/libs-api` team members.
As was discovered in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1154697627 ,
adding #[cfg(bootstrap)] to a rust-internal proc macro crate
would yield an unexpected cfg name error, at least on later
stages wher the bootstrap cfg arg wasn't set.
rustc already passes arguments to mark bootstrap as expected,
however the means of delivery through the RUSTFLAGS env var
is unable to reach proc macro crates, as described
in the issue linked in the code this commit touches.
This wouldn't be an issue for cfg args that get passed through
RUSTFLAGS, as they would never become *active* either, so
any usage of one of these flags in a proc macro's code would
legitimately yield a lint warning. But since dc302587e2,
rust takes extra measures to pass --cfg=bootstrap even in
proc macros, by passing it via the wrapper. Thus, we need
to send the flags to mark bootstrap as expected also from the
wrapper, so that #[cfg(bootstrap)] also works from proc macros.
I want to thank Urgau and jplatte for helping me find the cause of this. ❤️
Add a `BorrowedFd::try_clone_to_owned` and accompanying documentation
Add a `BorrowedFd::try_clone_to_owned`, which returns a new `OwnedFd` sharing the underlying file description. And similar for `BorrowedHandle` and `BorrowedSocket` on WIndows.
This is similar to the existing `OwnedFd::try_clone`, but it's named differently to reflect that it doesn't return `Result<Self, ...>`. I'm open to suggestions for better names.
Also, extend the `unix::io` documentation to mention that `dup` is permitted on `BorrowedFd`.
This was originally requsted [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88564#issuecomment-910786081). At the time I wasn't sure whether it was desirable, but it does have uses and it helps clarify the API. The documentation previously didn't rule out using `dup` on a `BorrowedFd`, but the API only offered convenient ways to do it from an `OwnedFd`. With this patch, the API allows one to do `try_clone` on any type where it's permitted.
The important methods like `read` and `write` were already inlined,
which can propagate all the way to inlining in user code, but these
small state functions were left behind as normal calls. They should
almost always be inlined as well, as they're just a few instructions.
[RFC 2011] Minimal initial implementation
Tracking issue: #44838
Third step of #96496
Implementation has ~290 LOC with the bare minimum to be in a functional state. Currently only searches for binary operations to mimic what `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!` already do.
r? `@oli-obk`
