For LLD integration the path to `llvm-config` needed to change to inside the
build directory itself (for whatever reason) but the build directory is
different on MSBuild than it is on `ninja` for MSVC builds, so the path to
`llvm-config.exe` was actually wrong and not working!
This commit removes the `Build::llvm_config` function in favor of the source of
truth, the `Llvm` build step itself. The build step was then updated to find the
right build directory for MSBuild as well as `ninja` for where `llvm-config.exe`
is located.
Closes#48749
Warn about ignored generic bounds in `for`
This adds a new lint to fix#42181. For consistency and to avoid code duplication, I also moved the existing "bounds in type aliases are ignored" here.
Questions to the reviewer:
* Is it okay to just remove a diagnostic error code like this? Should I instead keep the warning about type aliases where it is? The old code provided a detailed explanation of what's going on when asked, that information is now lost. On the other hand, `span_warn!` seems deprecated (after this patch, it has exactly one user left!).
* Did I miss any syntactic construct that can appear as `for` in the surface syntax? I covered function types (`for<'a> fn(...)`), generic traits (`for <'a> Fn(...)`, can appear both as bounds as as trait objects) and bounds (`for<'a> F: ...`).
* For the sake of backwards compatibility, this adds a warning, not an error. @nikomatsakis suggested an error in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42181#issuecomment-306924389, but I feel that can only happen in a new epoch -- right?
Cc @eddyb
Modify part of `column!` documentation.
Just like `line!` documentation, I've replaced:
> The returned column is not the invocation of the `column!` macro itself
By
> The returned column is *not necessarily* the line of the `column!` invocation itself
See #46997.
Modify part of `line!` documentation.
In accordance with #46997, I've replaced:
> The returned line is not the invocation of the line! macro itself [...]
By
> The returned line is *not necessarily* the line of the `line!` invocation itself [...]
rustc: Migrate to `termcolor` crate from `term`
This crate moves the compiler's error reporting to using the `termcolor` crate
from crates.io. Previously rustc used a super-old version of the `term` crate
in-tree which is basically unmaintained at this point, but Cargo has been using
`termcolor` for some time now and tools like `rg` are using `termcolor` as well,
so it seems like a good strategy to take!
Note that the `term` crate remains in-tree for libtest. Changing libtest will be
a bit tricky due to how the build works, but we can always tackle that later.
cc #45728
in which parentheses are suggested for should-have-been-tuple-patterns
Programmers used to working in some other languages (such as Python or
Go) might expect to be able to destructure values with comma-separated
identifiers but no parentheses on the left side of an assignment.
Previously, the first name in such code would get parsed as a
single-indentifier pattern—recognizing, for example, the
`let a` in `let a, b = (1, 2);`—whereupon we would have a fatal syntax
error on seeing an unexpected comma rather than the expected semicolon
(all the way nearer to the end of `parse_full_stmt`).
Instead, let's look for that comma when parsing the pattern, and if we
see it, make-believe that we're parsing the remaining elements in a
tuple pattern, so that we can suggest wrapping it all in parentheses. We
need to do this in a separate wrapper method called on a "top-level"
pattern, rather than within
`parse_pat` itself, because `parse_pat` gets called recursively to parse
the sub-patterns within a tuple pattern.
~~We could also do this for `match` arms, `if let`, and `while let`, but
we elect not to in this patch, as it seems less likely for users to make
the mistake in those contexts.~~
Resolves#48492.
r? @petrochenkov
Just like `line!` documentation, I've replaced:
> The returned column is not the invocation of the `column!` macro itself
By
> The returned column is *not necessarily* the line of the `column!` invocation itself
See #46997.
In accordance with #46997, I've replaced:
> The returned line is not the invocation of the line! macro itself [...]
By
> The returned line is *not necessarily* the line of the `line!` invocation itself [...]
Programmers used to working in some other languages (such as Python or
Go) might expect to be able to destructure values with comma-separated
identifiers but no parentheses on the left side of an assignment.
Previously, the first name in such code would get parsed as a
single-indentifier pattern—recognizing, for example, the
`let a` in `let a, b = (1, 2);`—whereupon we would have a fatal syntax
error on seeing an unexpected comma rather than the expected semicolon
(all the way nearer to the end of `parse_full_stmt`).
Instead, let's look for that comma when parsing the pattern, and if we
see it, momentarily make-believe that we're parsing the remaining
elements in a tuple pattern, so that we can suggest wrapping it all in
parentheses. We need to do this in a separate wrapper method called on
the top-level pattern (or `|`-patterns) in a `let` statement, `for`
loop, `if`- or `while let` expression, or match arm rather than within
`parse_pat` itself, because `parse_pat` gets called recursively to parse
the sub-patterns within a tuple pattern.
Resolves#48492.
rustc: Fix ICE with `#[target_feature]` on module
This commit fixes an ICE in rustc when `#[target_feature]` was applied to items
other than functions due to the way the feature was validated.
Add a potential cause raising `ParseIntError`.
Initially, I wanted to add it directly to the documentation of `str. parse()` method, I finally found that it was more relevant (I hope so?) to directly document the structure in question. I've added a scenario, in which we could all get caught at least once, to make it easier to diagnose the problem when parsing integers.
Replace iterator structures with `impl Trait`.
Two commits:
* Replace iterator structures with `impl Trait`.
* Run rustfmt on `src/librustc_data_structures/graph/mod.rs`.
See this page for details about FPXX:
https://dmz-portal.mips.com/wiki/MIPS_O32_ABI_-_FR0_and_FR1_Interlinking
Using FPXX is the most compatible floating point mode available and
allows the generated code to work in both FR0 and FR1 modes of the
processor. Using MSA (MIPS SIMD) requires FR1, so to use any MSA code we
need a compatible floating point mode.
This commit also sets nooddspreg (disabling the use of odd numbered
single precision float registers) as recommended when enabling FPXX.
