This is a more principled version of the `RefCell` we were using
before. We now allocate a `Steal<Mir<'tcx>>` for each intermediate MIR
pass; when the next pass steals the entry, any later attempts to use it
will panic (there is no way to *test* if MIR is stolen, you're just
supposed to *know*).
The new setup is as follows. There is a pipeline of MIR passes that each
run **per def-id** to optimize a particular function. You are intended
to request MIR at whatever stage you need it. At the moment, there is
only one stage you can request:
- `optimized_mir(def_id)`
This yields the final product. Internally, it pulls the MIR for the
given def-id through a series of steps. Right now, these are still using
an "interned ref-cell" but they are intended to "steal" from one
another:
- `mir_build` -- performs the initial construction for local MIR
- `mir_pass_set` -- performs a suite of optimizations and transformations
- `mir_pass` -- an individual optimization within a suite
So, to construct the optimized MIR, we invoke:
mir_pass_set((MIR_OPTIMIZED, def_id))
which will build up the final MIR.
Overall goal: reduce the amount of context a mir pass needs so that it
resembles a query.
- The hooks are no longer "threaded down" to the pass, but rather run
automatically from the top-level (we also thread down the current pass
number, so that the files are sorted better).
- The hook now receives a *single* callback, rather than a callback per-MIR.
- The traits are no longer lifetime parameters, which moved to the
methods -- given that we required
`for<'tcx>` objecs, there wasn't much point to that.
- Several passes now store a `String` instead of a `&'l str` (again, no
point).
Removal pass for anonymous parameters
Removes occurences of anonymous parameters from the
rustc codebase, as they are to be deprecated.
See issue #41686 and RFC 1685.
r? @frewsxcv
Add a lint to disallow anonymous parameters
Adds a (allow by default) lint to disallow anonymous parameters, like it was decided in RFC 1685 (rust-lang/rfcs#1685).
cc tracking issue #41686
On demandify region mapping
This is an adaptation of @cramertj's PR. I am sort of tempted to keep simplifying it, but also tempted to land it so and we can refactor more in follow-up PRs. As is, it does the following things:
- makes the region-maps an on-demand query, per function `tcx.region_maps(def_id)`
- interns code extents instead of of having them be integers
- remove the "root region extent" and (to some extent) item extents; instead we use `Option<CodeExtent<'tcx>>` in a few places (no space inefficiency since `CodeExtent<'tcx>` is now a pointer).
I'm not entirely happy with the way I have it setup though. Here are some of the changes I was considering (I'm not sure if they would work out well):
1. Removing `item_extents` entirely -- they are rarely used now, because most of the relevant places now accept an `Option<Region<'tcx>>` or an `Option<CodeExtent<'tcx>>`, but I think still used in a few places.
2. Merging `RegionMaps` into the typeck tables, instead of having it be its own query.
3. Change `CodeExtent<'tcx>` to store the parent pointer. This would mean that fewer places in the code actually *need* a `RegionMaps` anyhow, since most of them just want to be able to walk "up the tree". On the other hand, you wouldn't be able to intern a `CodeExtent<'tcx>` for some random node-id, you'd need to look it up in the table (since there'd be more information).
Most of this code is semi-temporary -- I expect it to largely go away as we move to NLL -- so I'm also not *that* concerned with making it perfect.
r? @eddyb
Under MinGW, x.py fails to run with UnboundLocalError.
Under MinGW, `x.py` will fail with the following errors:
```bash
$ ./x.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./x.py", line 20, in <module>
bootstrap.main()
File "C:/src/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 620, in main
bootstrap()
File "C:/src/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 601, in bootstrap
rb.build = rb.build_triple()
File "C:/src/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 459, in build_triple
if os.environ.get('MSYSTEM') == 'MINGW64':
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'os' referenced before assignment
```
The reason is due to the `build_triple` function in `src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py` (Line 416):
```python
if ostype == 'Linux':
os = subprocess.check_output(['uname', '-o']).strip().decode(default_encoding)
```
Here, the assignment to `os` is causing the `os` module to be shadowed.
Then, in (Line 459):
```python
if os.environ.get('MSYSTEM') == 'MINGW64':
cputype = 'x86_64'
```
`os` now refers to the uninitialized local variable, not the `os` module.
Easiest fix is to simply rename the `os` variable to something like `os_from_sp`.
Also, there is a small typo fix in `x.py` referencing the wrong file name.
Clean up callable type mismatch errors
```rust
error[E0593]: closure takes 1 argument but 2 arguments are required here
--> ../../src/test/ui/mismatched_types/closure-arg-count.rs:13:15
|
13 | [1, 2, 3].sort_by(|(tuple, tuple2)| panic!());
| ^^^^^^^ -------------------------- takes 1 argument
| |
| expected closure that takes 2 arguments
```
instead of
```rust
error[E0281]: type mismatch: the type `[closure@../../src/test/ui/mismatched_types/closure-arg-count.rs:13:23: 13:49]` implements the trait `for<'r> std::ops::FnMut<(&'r {integer},)>`, but the trait `for<'r, 'r> std::ops::FnMut<(&'r {integer}, &'r {integer})>` is required (expected a tuple with 2 elements, found one with 1 elements)
--> ../../src/test/ui/mismatched_types/closure-arg-count.rs:13:15
|
13 | [1, 2, 3].sort_by(|(tuple, tuple2)| panic!());
| ^^^^^^^
```
Fix#21857, re #24680.
Minimize single span suggestions into a label
changes
```
14 | println!("☃{}", tup[0]);
| ^^^^^^
|
help: to access tuple elements, use tuple indexing syntax as shown
| println!("☃{}", tup.0);
```
into
```
14 | println!("☃{}", tup[0]);
| ^^^^^^ to access tuple elements, use `tup.0`
```
Also makes suggestions explicit in the backend in preparation of adding multiple suggestions to a single diagnostic. Currently that's already possible, but results in a full help message + modified code snippet per suggestion, and has no rate limit (might show 100+ suggestions).
Unignore tests which work fine now.
As far as I can tell, these tests will now work fine. #13745 tracks the remaining tests which are ignored for various reasons.
Add RWPI/ROPI relocation model support
This PR adds support for using LLVM 4's ROPI and RWPI relocation models for ARM.
ROPI (Read-Only Position Independence) and RWPI (Read-Write Position Independence) are two new relocation models in LLVM for the ARM backend ([LLVM changset](https://reviews.llvm.org/rL278015)). The motivation is that these are the specific strategies we use in userspace [Tock](https://www.tockos.org) apps, so supporting this is an important step (perhaps the final step, but can't confirm yet) in enabling userspace Rust processes.
## Explanation
ROPI makes all code and immutable accesses PC relative, but not assumed to be overriden at runtime (so for example, jumps are always relative).
RWPI uses a base register (`r9`) that stores the addresses of the GOT in memory so the runtime (e.g. a kernel) only adjusts r9 tell running code where the GOT is.
## Complications adding support in Rust
While this landed in LLVM master back in August, the header files in `llvm-c` have not been updated yet to reflect it. Rust replicates that header file's version of the `LLVMRelocMode` enum as the Rust enum `llvm::RelocMode` and uses an implicit cast in the ffi to translate from Rust's notion of the relocation model to the LLVM library's notion.
My workaround for this currently is to replace the `LLVMRelocMode` argument to `LLVMTargetMachineRef` with an int and using the hardcoded int representation of the `RelocMode` enum. This is A Bad Idea(tm), but I think very nearly the right thing.
Would a better alternative be to patch rust-llvm to support these enum variants (also a fairly trivial change)?
Try fixing bigendian metadata serialisation
I compiled this on PPC to check and it seems to work, but not sure whether I didn't mess up
anything in a major way.
Maybe a good shot at #41443
The easiest way to *really* test this is to land the patch (a high priority would be good, since I quite literally am just twiddling my thumbs on this now), wait for nightly, and, if the nightly works, backport this to beta.
