8565: Fill match arms assist: add remaining arms for tuple of enums r=iDawer a=iDawer
Fix for #8493
However, the assist is still flaky and does not use `hir_ty::diagnostics::match_check`
Co-authored-by: Dawer <7803845+iDawer@users.noreply.github.com>
8540: Prevent being able to rename items that are not part of the workspace r=Veykril a=Veykril
This change causes renames that happen on items coming from crates outside the workspace to fail. I believe this should be the right approach, but usage of cargo's workspace might not be entirely correct for preventing these kinds of refactoring from touching things they shouldn't. I'm not entirely sure?
cc #6623, this is one of the bigger footguns when it comes to refactoring, especially in combination with import aliases people tend to rename items coming from a crates dependency which this prevents.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
8467: Adds impl Deref assist r=jhgg a=jhgg
This PR adds a new `generate_deref` assist that automatically generates a deref impl for a given struct field.
Check out this gif:
--
I have a few Q's:
- [x] Should I write more tests, if so, what precisely should I test for?
- [x] I have an inline question on line 65, can someone provide guidance? :)
- [x] I can implement this for `ast::TupleField` too. But should it be a separate assist fn, or should I try and jam both into the `generate_deref`?
- [x] I want to follow this up with an assist on `impl $0Deref for T {` which would automatically generate a `DerefMut` impl that mirrors the Deref as well, however, I could probably use some pointers on how to do that, since I'll have to reach into the ast of `fn deref` to grab the field that it's referencing for the `DerefMut` impl.
Co-authored-by: jake <jh@discordapp.com>
8560: Escape characters in doc comments in macros correctly r=jonas-schievink a=ChayimFriedman2
Previously they were escaped twice, both by `.escape_default()` and the debug view of strings (`{:?}`). This leads to things like newlines or tabs in documentation comments being `\\n`, but we unescape literals only once, ending up with `\n`.
This was hard to spot because CMark unescaped them (at least for `'` and `"`), but it did not do so in code blocks.
This also was the root cause of #7781. This issue was solved by using `.escape_debug()` instead of `.escape_default()`, but the real issue remained.
We can bring the `.escape_default()` back by now, however I didn't do it because it is probably slower than `.escape_debug()` (more work to do), and also in order to change the code the least.
Example (the keyword and primitive docs are `include!()`d at https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/std/lib.rs.html#570-578, and thus originate from macro):
Before:
After:
Co-authored-by: Chayim Refael Friedman <chayimfr@gmail.com>
Previously they were escaped twice, both by `.escape_default()` and the debug view of strings (`{:?}`). This leads to things like newlines or tabs in documentation comments being `\\n`, but we unescape literals only once, ending up with `\n`.
This was hard to spot because CMark unescaped them (at least for `'` and `"`), but it did not do so in code blocks.
This also was the root cause of #7781. This issue was solved by using `.escape_debug()` instead of `.escape_default()`, but the real issue remained.
We can bring the `.escape_default()` back by now, however I didn't do it because it is probably slower than `.escape_debug()` (more work to do), and also in order to change the code the least.
8510: Move cursor position when using item movers r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This updates the cursor position when moving items around to stay in the same location within the moved node.
I changed the `moveItem` response to `SnippetTextEdit[]`, since that made more sense to me (the file was ignored by the client anyways, since the edits always apply to the current document). It also matches `onEnter`, which seems logical to me, but please let me know if this doesn't make sense.
There's still a bug in the client-side snippet code that will cause the cursor position to be slightly off when moving parameters in the same line (presumably we don't track the column correctly after deleting `$0`). Not really sure how to fix that immediately, but this PR should already be an improvement despite that bug.
8533: Fix typo in style guide r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Fixes bold text rendering
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
8432: decl_check: consider outer scopes' allows r=jonas-schievink a=lf-
Fix#8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
I would like help filing the remaining bug, as it does actually affect
users, but I don't know how to describe the behaviour (or even if it
is unintended).
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
8354: Distinguishing between different operators in semantic highlighting r=matklad a=chetankhilosiya
Co-authored-by: Chetan Khilosiya <chetan.khilosiya@gmail.com>
8415: Fix faulty assertion when extracting function with macro call r=matklad a=brandondong
**Reproduction:**
```rust
fn main() {
let n = 1;
let k = n * n;
dbg!(n);
}
```
1. Select the second and third lines of the main function. Use the "Extract into function" code assist.
2. Panic occurs in debug, error is logged in release: "[ERROR ide_assists::handlers::extract_function] assertion failed: matches!(path, ast :: Expr :: PathExpr(_))".
3. Function generates successfully on release where the panic was bypassed.
```rust
fn fun_name(n: i32) {
let k = n * n;
dbg!(n);
}
```
**Cause:**
- The generated function will take `n` as a parameter. The extraction logic needs to search the usages of `n` to determine whether it is used mutably or not. The helper `path_element_of_reference` is called for each usage but the second usage is a macro call and fails the `Expr::PathExpr(_)` match assertion.
- The caller of `path_element_of_reference` does implicitly assume it to be a `Expr::PathExpr(_)` in how it looks at its parent node for determining whether it is used mutably. This logic will not work for macros.
- I'm not sure if there are any other cases besides macros where it could be something other than a `Expr::PathExpr(_)`. I tried various examples and could not find any.
**Fix:**
- Update assertion to include the macro case.
- Add a FIXME to properly handle checking if a macro usage requires mutable access. For now, return false instead of running the existing logic that is tailored for `Expr::PathExpr(_)`'s.
Co-authored-by: Brandon <brandondong604@hotmail.com>
