this is necessary so that the new idents are connected to the original strings.
this is important both for error messages, and so that top-level refs get connected
to the right things.
... it would also have been possible to add all of their dependencies,
but that would have increased the already-lengthy list of parameters.
Also, if we had macros that could expand into macro defns, you could
stage it. This seemed like the least painful choice.
This exposes a very simple function for resolving host names. There's a lot more that needs to be done, but this is probably enough for servo to get started connecting to real websites again.
The new glob tests created tmp/glob-tests as a directory, but the never removed
it. The `make clean` target then attempted to `rm -f` on this, but it couldn't
remove the directory. This both changes the clean target to `rm -rf` tmp files,
and also alters the tests to delete the directory that all the files are added
into.
The new glob tests created tmp/glob-tests as a directory, but the never removed
it. The `make clean` target then attempted to `rm -f` on this, but it couldn't
remove the directory. This both changes the clean target to `rm -rf` tmp files,
and also alters the tests to delete the directory that all the files are added
into.
(cc: #3227)
Parts I'm unsure about and would like a reviewer to look at are:
* `pub trait GenericPath : Clone + Eq + ToStr` -- is this the done thing? I've never done trait inheritance before, let alone from multiple traits, but it seemed to be necessary to be able to call all the methods we have to be able to call on `self`.
* changing the argument of `components` from `self` to `&self`, and having it return `self.components.clone()` instead of `self.components`; this was necessary to avoid move errors, but I'm not sure if it's the right thing. (The default methods impls now all have to call `self.components()` instead of just referencing the field `self.components`.)
Rationale: having a function which fails means that the location of
failure which is output is that of the unreachable() function, rather
than the caller.
This is part of #8991 but is not all of it; current usage of
``std::util::unreachable()`` must remain so for the moment, until a new
snapshot is made; then I will remove that function entirely in favour of
using this macro.
