swap function order for better read flow
I was reading this error message for the first time.
I was a little bit confused when reading that part:
```
foo.bar(); // we can now use this method since i32 implements the Foo trait
```
At the time I was reading `// we can now use this method` I wasn't sure why. It only made sense when reading on. So swapping these parts results in a better read flow.
coverage bug fixes and some refactoring
This replaces the relevant commits (2 and 3) from PR #85082, and also corrects an error querying for coverageinfo.
1. `coverageinfo` query needs to use the same MIR as codegen
I ran into an error trying to fix dead block coverage and realized the
`coverageinfo` query is getting a different MIR compared to the
codegenned MIR, which can sometimes be a problem during mapgen.
I changed that query to use the `InstandeDef` (which includes the
generic parameter substitutions, prosibly specific to const params)
instead of the `DefId` (without unknown/default const substitutions).
2. Simplified body_span and filtered span code
Some code cleanup extracted from future (but unfinished) commit to fix
coverage in attr macro functions.
3. Spanview needs the relevant body_span used for coverage
The coverage body_span doesn't always match the function body_span.
r? ```@tmandry```
Minimize amount of fake `DefId`s used in rustdoc
Follow up from #84707, which minimizes the amount of fake defids to the smallest amount possible. Every `FakeDefId` that is now used in the rustdoc library must be preserved and can not be replaced with a normal `DefId`.
Insignificant destructors rfc 2229
- Adds new attribute `rustc_insignificant_dtor` to annotate the drop method.
- Adds a query to check if a type has a significant drop.
- Updates closure analysis to check for significant drops rather than just drop.
A type marked with the attribute `rustc_insignificant_dtor` is considered to not be significant. A drop is significant if it is implemented by the user or does anything that will have any observable behavior (other than freeing up memory).
https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/35
Box `Impl.blanket_impl` to reduce size
Blanket impls are probably not super common, and `Type` is a fairly
large type, so this should reduce `Impl`'s size by a lot: `Option<Type>`
is around 96 bytes, and `Option<Box<Type>>` is 8 bytes, so it's a big
difference!
Error out if a PR is sent to the wrong channel
It happened multiple times that a PR meant to go on beta ends up being opened (and occasionally merged) to master. This PR does two things:
* Moves the definition of the channel in `src/ci/channel` so it's easier for tools to read it. I was not sure whether to move it to `src/channel` (like `src/version`): ended up with `src/ci` as it's currently only used for CI, but I'm open to moving it to `src`. We'll need to update the release process after this.
* Adds a check on **non-bors** builds that errors out if the base branch is not the expected one for the currently defined channel. This will not cause problems for promotion PRs, as those PRs are meant to also update the channel name.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Blanket impls are probably not super common, and `Type` is a fairly
large type, so this should reduce `Impl`'s size by a lot: `Option<Type>`
is around 96 bytes, and `Option<Box<Type>>` is 8 bytes, so it's a big
difference!
Preserve `SyntaxContext` for invalid/dummy spans in crate metadata
Fixes#85197
We already preserved the `SyntaxContext` for invalid/dummy spans in the
incremental cache, but we weren't doing the same for crate metadata.
If an invalid (lo/hi from different files) span is written to the
incremental cache, we will decode it with a 'dummy' location, but keep
the original `SyntaxContext`. Since the crate metadata encoder was only
checking for `DUMMY_SP` (dummy location + root `SyntaxContext`),
the metadata encoder would treat it as a normal span, encoding the
`SyntaxContext`. As a result, the final span encoded to the metadata
would change across sessions, even if the crate itself was unchanged.
This could lead to an 'unstable fingerprint' ICE under the following conditions:
1. We compile a crate with an invalid span using incremental compilation. The metadata encoder discards the `SyntaxContext` since the span is invalid, while the incremental cache encoder preserves the `SyntaxContext`
2. From another crate, we execute a foreign query, decoding the invalid span from the metadata as `DUMMY_SP` (e.g. with `SyntaxContext::root()`). This span gets hashed into the query fingerprint. So far, this has always happened through the `optimized_mir` query.
3. We recompile the first crate using our populated incremental cache, without changing anything. We load the (previously) invalid span from our incremental cache - it gets converted to a span with a dummy (but valid) location, along with the original `SyntaxContext`. This span gets written out to the crate metadata - since it now has a valid location, we preserve its `SyntaxContext`.
4. We recompile the second crate, again using a populated incremental cache. We now re-run the foreign query `optimized_mir` - the foreign crate hash is unchanged, but we end up decoding a different span (it now ha a non-root `SyntaxContext`). This results in the fingerprint changing, resulting in an ICE.
This PR updates our encoding of spans in the crate metadata to mirror
the encoding of spans into the incremental cache. We now always encode a
`SyntaxContext`, and encode location information for spans with a
non-dummy location.
Use the object crate for metadata reading
This allows sharing the metadata reader between cg_llvm, cg_clif and other codegen backends.
This is not currently useful for rlib reading with cg_spirv ([rust-gpu](https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/rust-gpu/)) as it uses tar rather than ar as .rlib format, but it is useful for dylib reading required for loading proc macros. (cc `@eddyb)`
The object crate is already trusted as dependency of libstd through backtrace. As far as I know it supports reading all object file formats used by targets for which we support rust dylibs with crate metadata, but I am not certain. If this happens to not be the case, I could keep using LLVM for reading dylib metadata.
Marked as WIP for a perf run and as it is based on #83637.
Improve error message for non-exhaustive matches on non-exhaustive enums
This pull request fixes#85227. For an enum marked with `#[non_exhaustive]` and not defined in the current crate, the error message for non-exhaustive matches now mentions the fact that the enum is marked as non-exhaustive:
```
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `_` not covered
--> main.rs:12:11
|
12 | match e {
| ^ pattern `_` not covered
|
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
= note: the matched value is of type `E`, which is marked as non-exhaustive
```
Store VariantIdx to distinguish enum variants
This saves ~24% of the instructions on the match-stress-enum benchmark, but I'm not 100% sure that this is OK - if we ever compare two constructors across enums (e.g., a Result and an Option), then this is obviously insufficient; I can experiment with continuing to store the DefId for comparison purposes in that case.
Add support for const operands and options to global_asm!
On x86, the default syntax is also switched to Intel to match asm!.
Currently `global_asm!` only supports `const` operands and the `att_syntax` option. In the future, `sym` operands will also be supported. However there is no plan to support any of the other operand types or options since they don't make sense in the context of `global_asm!`.
r? `@nagisa`
have on_completion record subcycles
have on_completion record subcycles
Rework `on_completion` method so that it removes all
provisional cache entries that are "below" a completed
node (while leaving those entries that are not below
the node).
This corrects an imprecise result that could in turn lead
to an incremental compilation failure. Under the old
scheme, if you had:
* A depends on...
* B depends on A
* C depends on...
* D depends on C
* T: 'static
then the provisional results for A, B, C, and D would all
be entangled. Thus, if A was `EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions`
(because of that final condition), then the result for C and
D would also be demoted to "ok modulo regions".
In reality, though, the result for C depends only on C and itself,
and is not dependent on regions. If we happen to evaluate the
cycle starting from C, we would never reach A, and hence the
result would be "ok".
Under the new scheme, the provisional results for C and D
are moved to the permanent cache immediately and are not affected
by the result of A.
Fixes#83538
r? `@Aaron1011`
add BITS associated constant to core::num::Wrapping
This keeps `Wrapping` synchronized with the primitives it wraps as for the #32463 `wrapping_int_impl` feature.
Rustdoc cleanup
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83332. The goal of this PR is to remove a few unused things:
* The "loading content" things are now unneeded.
* Some toggle CSS rules were still there.
* Some parts of the JS had a different indent, fixed it.
r? `@jsha`
Fix diagnostic for cross crate private tuple struct constructors
Fixes#78708.
There was already some limited support for certain cross-crate scenarios but that didn't handle a tuple struct rexported from an inner module for example (e.g. the NonZero* types as seen in #85049).
```Rust
➜ cat bug.rs
fn main() {
let _x = std::num::NonZeroU32(12);
let n = std::num::NonZeroU32::new(1).unwrap();
match n {
std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
}
}
```
**Before:**
<details>
```Rust
➜ rustc +nightly bug.rs
error[E0423]: expected function, tuple struct or tuple variant, found struct `std::num::NonZeroU32`
--> bug.rs:2:14
|
2 | let _x = std::num::NonZeroU32(12);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use struct literal syntax instead: `std::num::NonZeroU32 { 0: val }`
|
::: /home/luqman/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/nonzero.rs:148:1
[snip]
error[E0532]: expected tuple struct or tuple variant, found struct `std::num::NonZeroU32`
--> bug.rs:5:9
|
5 | std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use struct pattern syntax instead: `std::num::NonZeroU32 { 0 }`
|
::: /home/luqman/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/nonzero.rs:148:1
[snip]
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0423, E0532.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0423`.
```
</details>
**After:**
<details>
```Rust
➜ /rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc bug.rs
error[E0423]: cannot initialize a tuple struct which contains private fields
--> bug.rs:2:14
|
2 | let _x = std::num::NonZeroU32(12);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: constructor is not visible here due to private fields
--> /rust/library/core/src/num/nonzero.rs:148:1
[snip]
error[E0532]: cannot match against a tuple struct which contains private fields
--> bug.rs:5:9
|
5 | std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: constructor is not visible here due to private fields
--> bug.rs:5:30
|
5 | std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
| ^ private field
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0423, E0532.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0423`.
```
</details>
One question is if we should only collect the needed info for the cross-crate case after encountering an error instead of always doing it. Perf run perhaps to gauge the impact.
