Merge repeated definitions
Step forward on #66149
I may need further context to understand the need for a separate crate.
Also, please tell me if you think of other definitions to merge.
Make error and warning annotations mandatory in UI tests
This change makes error and warning annotations mandatory in UI tests.
The only exception are tests that use error patterns to match compiler
output and don't have any annotations.
Fixes#55596.
This change makes error and warning annotations mandatory in UI tests.
The only exception are tests that use error patterns to match compiler
output and don't have any annotations.
Support registering inert attributes and attribute tools using crate-level attributes
And remove `#[feature(custom_attribute)]`.
(`rustc_plugin::Registry::register_attribute` is not removed yet, I'll do it in a follow up PR.)
```rust
#![register_attr(my_attr)]
#![register_tool(my_tool)]
#[my_attr] // OK
#[my_tool::anything] // OK
fn main() {}
```
---
Some tools (`rustfmt` and `clippy`) used in tool attributes are hardcoded in the compiler.
We need some way to introduce them without hardcoding as well.
This PR introduces a way to do it with a crate level attribute.
The previous attempt to introduce them through command line (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57921) met some resistance.
This probably needs to go through an RFC before stabilization.
However, I'd prefer to land *this* PR without an RFC to able to remove `#[feature(custom_attribute)]` and `Registry::register_attribute` while also providing a replacement.
---
`register_attr` is a direct replacement for `#![feature(custom_attribute)]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29642), except it doesn't rely on implicit fallback from unresolved attributes to custom attributes (which was always hacky and is the primary reason for the removal of `custom_attribute`) and requires registering the attribute explicitly.
It's not clear whether it should go through stabilization or not.
It's quite possible that all the uses should migrate to `#![register_tool]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66079) instead.
---
Details:
- The naming is `register_attr`/`register_tool` rather than some `register_attributes` (plural, no abbreviation) for consistency with already existing attributes like `cfg_attr`, or `feature`, etc.
---
Previous attempt: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57921
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44690
Tracking issues: #66079 (`register_tool`), #66080 (`register_attr`)
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29642
Split libsyntax apart
In this PR the general idea is to separate the AST, parser, and friends by a more data / logic structure (tho not fully realized!) by separating out the parser and macro expansion code from libsyntax. Specifically have now three crates instead of one (libsyntax):
- libsyntax:
- concrete syntax tree (`syntax::ast`)
- definition of tokens and token-streams (`syntax::{token, tokenstream}`) -- used by `syntax::ast`
- visitors (`syntax::visit`, `syntax::mut_visit`)
- shared definitions between `libsyntax_expand`
- feature gating (`syntax::feature_gate`) -- we could possibly move this out to its own crater later.
- attribute and meta item utilities, including used-marking (`syntax::attr`)
- pretty printer (`syntax::print`) -- this should possibly be moved out later. For now I've reduced down the dependencies to a single essential one which could be broken via `ParseSess`. This entails that e.g. `Debug` impls for `Path` cannot reference the pretty printer.
- definition of `ParseSess` (`syntax::sess`) -- this is used by `syntax::{attr, print, feature_gate}` and is a common definition used by the parser and other things like librustc.
- the `syntax::source_map` -- this includes definitions used by `syntax::ast` and other things but could ostensibly be moved `syntax_pos` since that is more related to this module.
- a smattering of misc utilities not sufficiently important to itemize -- some of these could be moved to where they are used (often a single place) but I wanted to limit the scope of this PR.
- librustc_parse:
- parser (`rustc_parse::parser`) -- reading a file and such are defined in the crate root tho.
- lexer (`rustc_parse::lexer`)
- validation of meta grammar (post-expansion) in (`rustc_parse::validate_attr`)
- libsyntax_expand -- this defines the infra for macro expansion and conditional compilation but this is not libsyntax_ext; we might want to merge them later but currently libsyntax_expand is depended on by librustc_metadata which libsyntax_ext is not.
- conditional compilation (`syntax_expand::config`) -- moved from `syntax::config` to here
- the bulk of this crate is made up of the old `syntax::ext`
r? @estebank
Move next node ID to Resolver
This moves the `next_node_id` method(s) and related tracking information to the resolver. By doing so, we also remove the OneThread and Cell on next_node_id in Session in this move, which means that the new code is simpler and less "interesting" as it doesn't tie itself to a single thread.
This required moving some of the pretty-printing logic around, but this was just copying the code without any semantic changes, so it's just a second commit instead of a separate PR; I can polish it up a bit more if desired.
rustc_metadata: don't let LLVM confuse rmeta blobs for COFF object files.
This has likely been a silent issue since 1.10 but only caused trouble recently (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65536#issuecomment-552018224), when recent changes to the `rmeta` schema introduced more opportunities for COFF parse errors.
To prevent any undesired interactions with old compilers, I've renamed the file inside `rlib`s from `rust.metadata.bin` to `lib.rmeta` (not strongly attached to it, suggestions welcome).
Fixes#65536.
<hr/>
Before:
```
$ llvm-objdump -all-headers build/*/stage1-std/*/release/deps/libcore-*.rmeta
build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/libcore-6b9e8b5a59b79a1d.rmeta: file format COFF-<unknown arch>
architecture: unknown
start address: 0x00000000
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA Type
SYMBOL TABLE:
```
After:
```
$ llvm-objdump -all-headers build/*/stage1-std/*/release/deps/libcore-*.rmeta
llvm-objdump: error: 'build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/libcore-6b9e8b5a59b79a1d.rmeta':
The file was not recognized as a valid object file
```
invalid_value lint: use diagnostic items
This adjusts the invalid_value lint to use diagnostic items.
@Centril @oli-obk For some reason, this fails to recognize `transmute` -- somehow the diagnostic item is not found. Any idea why?
r? @Centril
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66075
[mir-opt] Handle return place in ConstProp and improve SimplifyLocals pass
Temporarily rebased on top of #66074. The top 2 commits are new.
r? @oli-obk
