Small improvements in lexical_region_resolve
This just replaces a trivial `if` condition with a `|=` in two places.
I could even have used a `fold` in the first case, but I think it would be less readable.
Use matches macro in libcore and libstd
This PR replaces matches like
```rust
match var {
value => true,
_ => false,
}
```
with use of `matches!` macro.
r? @Centril
Treat extern statics just like statics in the "const pointer to static" representation
fixes#67612
r? @spastorino
cc @RalfJung this does not affect runtime promotion at all. This is just about promotion within static item bodies.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #67774 (Try statx for all linux-gnu target.)
- #67781 (Move `is_min_const_fn` query to librustc_mir.)
- #67798 (Remove wrong advice about spin locks from `spin_loop_hint` docs)
- #67849 (Add a check for swapped words when we can't find an identifier)
- #67875 (Distinguish between private items and hidden items in rustdoc)
- #67887 (`Option::{expect,unwrap}` and `Result::{expect, expect_err, unwrap, unwrap_err}` have `#[track_caller]`)
- #67955 (rustdoc: Remove more `#[doc(cfg(..))]` duplicates)
- #67977 (Updates for VxWorks)
- #67985 (Remove insignificant notes from CStr documentation)
- #68003 (ci: fix wrong shared.sh import for publish_toolstate)
Failed merges:
- #67820 (Parse the syntax described in RFC 2632)
- #67979 (Move `intravisit` => `rustc_hir` + misc cleanup)
r? @ghost
Remove insignificant notes from CStr documentation
The to_str and to_string_lossy methods contain a note about the behavior possibly changing in the future. But those notes are referring to a distinction that is not observable in the API. Whether or not the UTF-8 check knows the string length ahead of time, these methods require linear time.
`Option::{expect,unwrap}` and `Result::{expect, expect_err, unwrap, unwrap_err}` have `#[track_caller]`
The annotated functions now produce panic messages pointing to the location where they were called, rather than `core`'s internals.
Distinguish between private items and hidden items in rustdoc
I believe rustdoc should not be conflating private items (visibility lower than `pub`) and hidden items (attribute `doc(hidden)`). This matters now that Cargo is passing --document-private-items by default for bin crates. In bin crates that rely on macros, intentionally hidden implementation details of the macros can overwhelm the actual useful internal API that one would want to document.
This PR restores the strip-hidden pass when documenting private items, and introduces a separate unstable --document-hidden-items option to skip the strip-hidden pass. The two options are orthogonal to one another.
Fixes#67851. Closes#60884.
Add a check for swapped words when we can't find an identifier
Fixes#66968
Couple things here:
1. The matches take the precedence of case insensitive match, then levenshtein match, then swapped words match. Doing this allows us to not even check for swapped words unless the other checks return `None`.
2. I've assumed that the swapped words check is not held to the limits of the max levenshtein distance threshold (ie. we want to try and find a match even if the levenshtein distance is very high). This means that we cannot perform this check in the `fold` that occurs after the `filter_map` call, because the candidate will be filtered out. So, I've split this into two separate `fold` calls, and had to collect the original iterator into a vec so it can be copied (I don't think we want to change the function signature to take a vec or require the `Copy` trait). An alternative implemenation may be to remove the `filter_map`, `fold` over the entire iterator, and do a check against `max_dist` inside the relevant cases there.
r? @estebank
Remove wrong advice about spin locks from `spin_loop_hint` docs
Using a pure spin lock for a critical section in a preemptable thread
is always wrong, however short the critical section may be. The thread
might be preempted, which will cause all other threads to hammer
busily at the core for the whole quant. Moreover, if threads have
different priorities, this might lead to a priority inversion problem
and a deadlock. More generally, a spinlock is not more efficient than
a well-written mutex, which typically does several spin iterations at
the start anyway.
The advise about UP vs SMP is also irrelevant in the context of
preemptive threads.
See also accompanying piece: https://matklad.github.io/2020/01/02/spinlocs-considered-harmful.html
And another, independent piece: https://probablydance.com/2019/12/30/measuring-mutexes-spinlocks-and-how-bad-the-linux-scheduler-really-is
EDIT: obligatory disclosure that I am not an expert in these things, and might be terribly wrong :)
Move `is_min_const_fn` query to librustc_mir.
The only two uses of the associated methods are in `librustc_mir` and
`librustdoc`. Please tell me if there is a better choice.
cc #65031
