It can be useful to do some computation in `assert!` format arguments, in order to get better error messages. For example:
```rust
assert!(
some_condition,
"The state is invalid. Details: {}",
expensive_call_to_get_debugging_info(),
);
```
It seems like `assert!` only evaluates the format arguments if the assertion fails, which is useful but doesn't appear to be documented anywhere. This PR documents the behavior and adds some tests.
This does not suggest adding such a function to the public API. This is
just for the purpose of avoiding duplicate code. Many array methods
already contained the same kind of code and there are still many array
related methods to come (e.g. `Iterator::{chunks, map_windows, next_n,
...}`) which all basically need this functionality. Writing custom
`unsafe` code for each of those seems not like a good idea.
The use of module-level functions instead of associated functions
on `<*const T>` or `<*mut T>` follows the precedent of
`ptr::slice_from_raw_parts` and `ptr::slice_from_raw_parts_mut`.
BTree: remove outdated traces of coercions
The introduction of `marker::ValMut` (#75200) meant iterators no longer see mutable keys but their code still pretends it does. And settle on the majority style `Some(unsafe {…})` over `unsafe { Some(…) }`.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Initialize BTree nodes directly in the heap
We can avoid any stack-local nodes entirely by using `Box::new_uninit`, and since the nodes are mostly `MaybeUninit` fields, we only need a couple of actual writes before `assume_init`. This should help with the stack overflows in #81444, and may also improve performance in general.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
cc `@ssomers`
Added tests to drain an empty vec
Discovered this kind of issue in an unrelated library.
The author copied the tests from here and AFAIK, there are no tests for this particular case.
https://github.com/LeonineKing1199/minivec/pull/19
Signed-off-by: Hanif Bin Ariffin <hanif.ariffin.4326@gmail.com>
Add docs for shared_from_slice From impls
The advantage of making these docs is mostly in pointing out that these
functions all make new allocations and copy/clone/move the source into them.
These docs are on the function, and not the `impl` block, to avoid showing
the "[+] show undocumented items" button.
CC #51430
Fix doc test for Vec::retain(), now passes clippy::eval_order_dependence
Doc test for Vec::retain() works correctly but is flagged by clippy::eval_order_dependence. Fix avoids the issue by using an iterator instead of an index.
