5553: Add fix ranges for diagnostics r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
A follow-up of https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Fwg-rls-2.2E0/topic/Less.20red.20in.20the.20code
Now diagnostics can apply fixes in a range that's different from the range used to highlight the diagnostics.
Previous logic did not consider the fix range, having both ranges equal, which could cause a lot of red noise in the editor.
Now, the fix range gets used with the fix, the diagnostics range is used for everything else which allows to improve the error highlighting.
before:
<img width="191" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2690773/88590727-df9a6a00-d063-11ea-97ed-9809c1c5e6e6.png">
after:
<img width="222" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2690773/88590734-e1fcc400-d063-11ea-9b7c-25701cbd5352.png">
`MissingFields` and `MissingPatFields` diagnostics now have the fix range as `ast::RecordFieldList` of the expression with an error (as it was before this PR), and the diagnostics range as a `ast::Path` of the expression, if it's present (do you have any example of `ast::Expr::RecordLit` that has no path btw?).
The rest of the diagnostics have both ranges equal, same as it was before this PR.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
4743: Add tracking of packed repr, use it to highlight unsafe refs r=matklad a=Nashenas88
Taking a reference to a misaligned field on a packed struct is an
unsafe operation. Highlight that behavior. Currently, the misaligned
part isn't tracked, so this highlight is a bit too aggressive.
Fixes#4600
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <Nashenas88@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <nashenas88@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <paulf@pop-os.localdomain>
5699: Fix clippy warnings r=matklad a=popzxc
Currently clippy spawns a bunch of warnings on the `rust-analyzer` project. Nothing critical, but easy to fix, so I guess it won't harm.
Co-authored-by: Igor Aleksanov <popzxc@yandex.ru>
5705: Log the command flycheck runs to debug misconfigurations r=jonas-schievink a=Veetaha
Without this users have no clue why flycheck fails to run.
This is what is printed to the output channel:
```
[ERROR rust_analyzer::main_loop] cargo check failed: Cargo watcher failed,the command produced no valid metadata (exit code: ExitStatus(ExitStatus(25856)))
```
I stumbled with this figuring out that rust-analyzer adds `--all-features` which is not intended
for some crates in the workspace (i.e. they have mutually-exclusive features).
Having the command rust-analyzer ran should help a lot
Co-authored-by: Veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
Without this users have no clue why flycheck fails to run.
This is what is printed to the output channel:
```
[ERROR rust_analyzer::main_loop] cargo check failed: Cargo watcher failed,the command produced no valid metadata (exit code: ExitStatus(ExitStatus(25856)))
```
I stumbled with this figuring out that rust-analyzer adds `--all-features` which is not intended
for some crates in the workspace (e.g. they have mutually-exclusive features.
Having the command rust-analyzer ran should help a lot
