part of #24407
I'm not sure whether I should be trying to explain the general rule in the E0210 explanation or just point people to the RFC. However, if we go with the latter option I think that the RFC will need to be revised slightly, since it is not quite as gentle as I would like.
Also, the link to RFC 1023 is not the correct one (it should be https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1023-rebalancing-coherence.md), but the correct one is too long. I'm aware of @michaelsproul's PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/26290 from awhile back, but it doesn't seem to be working. Has there not been a new snapshot yet?
#27360 removed a padding field full of uint8_t's, but didn't remove
the use. This didn't get picked up presumably because (a) bors
doesn't have any BSD builders, and/or (b) #[cfg]'d out blocks don't
get linted.
```
rustc: x86_64-unknown-freebsd/stage1/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd/lib/liblibc
src/liblibc/lib.rs:1099:42: 1099:49 error: unused import, #[deny(unused_imports)] on by default
src/liblibc/lib.rs:1099 use types::common::c99::{uint8_t, uint32_t, int32_t};
^~~~~~~
error: aborting due to previous error
fatal runtime error: Could not unwind stack, error = 159555904
```
this makes the second code block consistent with the first code block -- other than being in reversed order, the first code block claims b is u16 and c is u32, whereas the second code block claims the opposite. seems to be an obvious typo.
This is *mostly* reducing *my* use of *italics* but there's some other misc changes interspersed as I went along.
This updates the italicizing alphabetically from `a` to `ra`.
r? @steveklabnik
#27360 removed a padding field full of uint8_t's, but didn't remove
the use. This didn't get picked up presumably because (a) bors
doesn't have any BSD builders, and/or (b) #[cfg]'d out blocks don't
get linted.
```
rustc: x86_64-unknown-freebsd/stage1/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-freebsd/lib/liblibc
src/liblibc/lib.rs:1099:42: 1099:49 error: unused import, #[deny(unused_imports)] on by default
src/liblibc/lib.rs:1099 use types::common::c99::{uint8_t, uint32_t, int32_t};
^~~~~~~
error: aborting due to previous error
fatal runtime error: Could not unwind stack, error = 159555904
```
There are still problems in both the design and implementation of this, so we don't want it landing in 1.2.
cc @arielb1 @nikomatsakis
cc #27364
r? @alexcrichton
The following APIs were all marked with a `#[stable]` tag:
* process::Child::id
* error::Error::is
* error::Error::downcast
* error::Error::downcast_ref
* error::Error::downcast_mut
* io::Error::get_ref
* io::Error::get_mut
* io::Error::into_inner
* hash::Hash::hash_slice
* hash::Hasher::write_{i,u}{8,16,32,64,size}
This isn't actually necessary any more with the advent of `$crate` and changes
in the compiler to expand macros to `::core::$foo` in the context of a
`#![no_std]` crate.
The libcore inner module was also trimmed down a bit to the bare bones.
As there’s no C++ runtime any more there’s really no point in having anything but Rust tags being made.
I’ve also taken the liberty of excluding the compiler parts of this in the `librust%,,` pattern substitution. Whether or not this is “correct” will depend on whether you want tags for the compiler or for general use. For myself, I want it for general use.
I’m not sure how much people use the tags files anyway. I definitely do, but with Racer existing the tags files aren’t quite so necessary.
This is a minor [breaking-change], as it changes what
`boxed_str.to_owned()` does (previously it would deref to `&str` and
call `to_owned` on that to get a `String`). However `Box<str>` is such an
exceptionally rare type that this is not expected to be a serious
concern. Also a `Box<str>` can be freely converted to a `String` to
obtain the previous result anyway.
I think this was just missed when `Send` and `Sync` were redone, since it seems odd to not be able to use things like `Arc<AtomicPtr>`. If it was intentional feel free to just close this.
I used another test as a template for writing mine, so I hope I got all the headers and stuff right.
VecMap doesn't really fit with the current standard library's strategy (small!).
I've mirrored the code to https://github.com/contain-rs/vec-map
but @GBGamer has already claimed the name on crates.io a couple months ago for the same purpose. It hasn't been updated since, though.
CC @rust-lang/libs
This is a minor [breaking-change], as it changes what
`boxed_str.to_owned()` does (previously it would deref to `&str` and
call `to_owned` on that to get a `String`). However `Box<str>` is such an
exceptionally rare type that this is not expected to be a serious
concern. Also a `Box<str>` can be freely converted to a `String` to
obtain the previous behaviour anyway.
I've been baking this out of tree for long enough. This is currently about ~2/5ths the size of TRPL. Time to get it in tree so it can be more widely maintained and scrutinized. I've preserved the whole gruesome history including various rewrites. I can definitely squash these a fair amount if desired. Some random people submitted minor fixes though, so they're mixed in.
Edit: forgot to link to rendered http://cglab.ca/~abeinges/blah/turpl/_book/
Edit2:
To streamline the review process, I'm going to break this into sections that need official "domain expert" approval:
# Summary
* [ ] references.md -- very important, needs work
* [x] Meet Safe and Unsafe: reviewed by @aturon
* [x] Data Layout: reviewed by @arielb1
* [x] Ownership: reviewed by @aturon ( and sorta @nikomatsakis ) -- significantly updated, may need re-r
* [x] Coversions: reviewed by @nrc
* [x] Uninitialized Memory: reviewed by @pnkfelix
* [x] Ownership-Oriented Resource Management: reviewed by @aturon
* [x] Unwinding: reviewed by @alexcrichton
* [x] Concurrency: reviewed by @aturon
* [x] Implementing Vec: r? @huonw
