fix an ICE on unwrapping a None
This very likely fixes#8166 though I wasn't able to meaningfully reduce a test case. This line is the only call to `unwrap` within that function, which was the one in the stack trace that triggered the ICE, so I think we'll be OK.
`@hackmad` can you pull and build this branch and check if it indeed fixes your problem?
---
changelog: Fixed ICE in [`unnecessary_cast`]
fix [`shadow_reuse`] false negative for if let bindings
fixes#8087
changelog: trigger [`shadow_reuse`] instead of [`shadow_unrelated`] on shadowed `if let` bindings
Improve `unwrap_or_else_default` when handling `unwrap_or_else(XXX::new)`
changelog: change `unwrap_or_else_default` to work with std constructors like `Vec::new`, `HashSet::new`, `HashMap::new`.
Notes:
- Code to handle detecting those constructors is already there. I moved it out to `is_default_equivalent_call`
Add suggestion for neg_multiply lint
This fixes#8115 by adding a suggestion for [neg_multiply].
My first issue on Github, any feedback or input is welcome 😃
changelog: create a suggestion for `neg_multiply`
Test clippy_utils in CI
r? `@xFrednet` Since you did the last refactor of the `str_utils` functions in #7873
changelog: Make sure tests in `clippy_utils` are passing by testing it in CI
This makes sure that the tests in clippy_utils are run in CI.
When looking into this I discovered that two tests were failing and
multiple doc tests were failing. This fixes those tests and enables a
few more doc tests.
Fix `SAFETY` comment tag casing in undocumented_unsafe_blocks
This changes the lint introduced in #7748 to suggest adding a `SAFETY` comment instead of a `Safety` comment.
Searching for `// Safety:` in rust-lang/rust yields 67 results while `// SAFETY:` yields 1072.
I think it's safe to say that this comment tag is written in upper case, just like `TODO`, `FIXME` and so on are. As such I would expect this lint to follow the official convention as well.
Note that I intentionally introduced some casing diversity in `tests/ui/undocumented_unsafe_blocks.rs` to test more cases than just `Safety:`.
changelog: Capitalize `SAFETY` comment in [`undocumented_unsafe_blocks`]
Don't emit RETURN_SELF_NOT_MUST_USE lint if `Self` already is marked as `#[must_use]`
New bug discovered with this lint. Hopefully, this is the last one.
---
changelog: none
Ensure that RETURN_SELF_NOT_MUST_USE is not emitted if the method already has `#[must_use]`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8140.
---
Edit:
changelog: none
(The lint is not in beta yet, this should therefore not be included inside the changelog :) )
Fix commits and formatting of CHANGELOG.md
r? `@Manishearth`
Follow up to #8136
I think the beta commit update didn't take the backport we've done into account. I fixed the commit ranges. And while I was at it, I also applied my usual formatting to the changelog entries.
changelog: none
Add `unnecessary_to_owned` lint
This PR adds a lint to check for unnecessary calls to `ToOwned::to_owned` and other similar functions (e.g., `Cow::into_owned`, `ToString::to_string`, etc.).
The lint checks for expressions of the form `&receiver.to_owned_like()` used in a position requiring type `&T` where one of the following is true:
* `receiver`'s type is `T` exactly
* `receiver`'s type implements `Deref<Target = T>`
* `receiver`'s type implements `AsRef<T>`
The lint additionally checks for expressions of the form `receiver.to_owned_like()` used as arguments of type `impl AsRef<T>`.
It would be nice if the lint could also check for expressions used as arguments to functions like the following:
```
fn foo<T: AsRef<str>>(x: T) { ... }
```
However, I couldn't figure out how to determine whether a function input type was instantiated from a parameter with a trait bound.
If someone could offer me some guidance, I would be happy to add such functionality.
Closes#7933
changelog: Add [`unnecessary_to_owned`] lint
Stabilize `iter::zip`
Hello all!
As the tracking issue (#83574) for `iter::zip` completed the final commenting period without any concerns being raised, I hereby submit this stabilization PR on the issue.
As the pull request that introduced the feature (#82917) states, the `iter::zip` function is a shorter way to zip two iterators. As it's generally a quality-of-life/ergonomic improvement, it has been integrated into the codebase without any trouble, and has been
used in many places across the rust compiler and standard library since March without any issues.
For more details, I would refer to `@cuviper's` original PR, or the [function's documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/fn.zip.html).
Tweak errors coming from `for`-loop, `?` and `.await` desugaring
* Suggest removal of `.await` on non-`Future` expression
* Keep track of obligations introduced by desugaring
* Remove span pointing at method for obligation errors coming from desugaring
* Point at called local sync `fn` and suggest making it `async`
```
error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
--> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:9:10
|
LL | boo().await;
| -----^^^^^^ `()` is not a future
| |
| this call returns `()`
|
= help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()`
help: do not `.await` the expression
|
LL - boo().await;
LL + boo();
|
help: alternatively, consider making `fn boo` asynchronous
|
LL | async fn boo () {}
| +++++
```
Fix#66731.
Stabilize asm! and global_asm!
Tracking issue: #72016
It's been almost 2 years since the original [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2850) was posted and we're finally ready to stabilize this feature!
The main changes in this PR are:
- Removing `asm!` and `global_asm!` from the prelude as per the decision in #87228.
- Stabilizing the `asm` and `global_asm` features.
- Removing the unstable book pages for `asm` and `global_asm`. The contents are moved to the [reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1105) and [rust by example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/pull/1483).
- All links to these pages have been removed to satisfy the link checker. In a later PR these will be replaced with links to the reference or rust by example.
- Removing the automatic suggestion for using `llvm_asm!` instead of `asm!` if you're still using the old syntax, since it doesn't work anymore with `asm!` no longer being in the prelude. This only affects code that predates the old LLVM-style `asm!` being renamed to `llvm_asm!`.
- Updating `stdarch` and `compiler-builtins`.
- Updating all the tests.
r? `@joshtriplett`
