Update windows ffi bindings
Bump `windows-bindgen` to version 0.51.1. This brings with it some changes to the generated FFI bindings, but little that affects the code.
One change that does have more of an impact is `SOCKET` being `usize` instead of either `u64` or `u32` (as is used in std's public `SOCKET` type). However, it's now easy enough to abstract over that difference.
Finally I added a few new bindings that are likely to be used in pending PRs, mostly to make sure they're ok with the new metadata.
r? libs
Convert `Into<ExitStatus> for ExitStatusError` to `From<ExitStatusError> for ExitStatus` in `std::process`
Implementing suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84908#issuecomment-912352902:
> I believe the impl on ExitStatusError should be
>
> ```rust
> impl From<ExitStatusError> for ExitStatus
> ```
>
> rather than
>
> ```rust
> impl Into<ExitStatus> for ExitStatusError
> ```
>
> (there is generally never anything implemented as `Into` first, because implementing `From` reflexively provides `Into`)
Implement From<OwnedFd/Handle> for ChildStdin/out/err object
## Summary
Comments in `library/std/src/process.rs` ( ab08639e59 ) indicates that `ChildStdin`, `ChildStdout`, `ChildStderr` implements some traits that are not actually implemented: `FromRawFd`, `FromRawHandle`, and the `From<OwnedFd>/From<OwnedHandle>` from the io_safety feature.
In this PR I implement `FromRawHandle` and `FromRawFd` for those 3 objects.
## Usecase
I have a usecase where those implementations are basically needed. I want to customize
in the `Command::spawn` API how the pipes for the parent/child communications are created (mainly to strengthen the security attributes on them). I can properly setup the pipes,
and the "child" handles can be provided to `Child::spawn` easily using `Stdio::from_raw_handle`. However, there is no way to generate the `ChildStd*` objects from the raw handle of the created name pipe, which would be very useful to still expose the same API
than in other OS (basically a `spawn(...) -> (Child, ChildStdin, ChildStdout, ChildSterr)`, where on windows this is customized), and to for example use `tokio::ChildStdin::from_std` afterwards.
## Questions
* Are those impls OK to add? I have searched to see if those impls were missing on purpose, or if it was just never implemented because never needed. I haven't found any indication on why they couldn't be added, although the user clearly has to be very careful that the handle provided makes sense (i think, mainly that it is in overlapped mode for windows).
* If this change is ok, adding the impls for the io_safety feature would probably be best, or should it be done in another PR?
* I just copy-pasted the `#[stable(...)]` attributes, but the `since` value has to be updated, I'm not sure to which value.
The current structure is clumsy, calling `alloc_raw_without_grow` in one
function, and then if that fails, calling another function that calls
`alloc_raw_without_grow` again.
fix a comment about assert_receiver_is_total_eq
"a type implements #[deriving]" doesn't make any sense, so I assume they meant "implement `Eq`"? Also the attribute is called `derive`.
error: unresolved link to `std::fmt::Error`
--> library/core/src/fmt/mod.rs:115:52
|
115 | /// This function will return an instance of [`std::fmt::Error`] on error.
|
|
= note: `-D rustdoc::broken-intra-doc-links` implied by `-D warnings`
Implement `From<{&,&mut} [T; N]>` for `Vec<T>` where `T: Clone`
Currently, if `T` implements `Clone`, we can create a `Vec<T>` from an `&[T]` or an `&mut [T]`, can we also support creating a `Vec<T>` from an `&[T; N]` or an `&mut [T; N]`? Also, do I need to add `#[inline]` to the implementation?
ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#220. [Accepted]
Closes#100880.
