Commit Graph

76381 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oliver Middleton
521e41e77d Correct a few stability attributes 2018-04-05 15:39:29 +01:00
bors
5758c2dd14 Auto merge of #48575 - ishitatsuyuki:unix-no-thread, r=alexcrichton
rustc_driver: get rid of the extra thread

**Do not rollup**

We can alter the stack size afterwards on Unix.

Having a separate thread causes poor debugging experience when interrupting with signals. I have to get the backtrace of the all thread, as the main thread is waiting to join doing nothing else. This patch allows me to just run `bt` to get the desired backtrace.
2018-04-04 06:19:40 +00:00
bors
20338a5240 Auto merge of #49573 - glandium:huge-align, r=SimonSapin
Reject huge alignments on macos with system allocator only

ef8804ba27 addressed #30170 by rejecting
huge alignments at the allocator API level, transforming a specific
platform bug/limitation into an enforced API limitation on all
platforms.

This change essentially reverts that commit, and instead makes alloc()
itself return AllocErr::Unsupported when receiving huge alignments.

This was discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32838#issuecomment-368348408
and following.
2018-04-04 03:48:22 +00:00
bors
199b7e211d Auto merge of #48333 - aidanhs:aphs-no-place-for-placement, r=nikomatsakis
Remove all unstable placement features

Closes #22181, #27779. Effectively makes the assortment of placement RFCs (rust-lang/rfcs#470, rust-lang/rfcs#809, rust-lang/rfcs#1228) 'unaccepted'. It leaves `box_syntax` and keeps the `<-` token as recognised by libsyntax.

------------------------

I don't know the correct process for unaccepting an unstable feature that was accepted as an RFC so...here's a PR.

Let me preface this by saying I'm not particularly happy about doing this (I know it'll be unpopular), but I think it's the most honest expression of how things stand today. I've been motivated by a [post on reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/7wrqk2/when_will_box_and_placementin_syntax_be_stable/) which asks when these features will be stable - the features have received little RFC-style design work since the end of 2015 (~2 years ago) and leaving them in limbo confuses people who want to know where they're up to. Without additional design work that needs to happen (see the collection of unresolved questions later in this post) they can't really get stabilised, and I think that design work would be most suited to an RFC rather than (currently mostly unused) experimental features in Rust nightly.

I have my own motivations - it's very simple to 'defeat' placement in debug mode today and I don't want a placement in Rust that a) has no guarantees to work and b) has no plan for in-place serde deserialisation.

There's a quote in [1]: "Ordinarily these uncertainties might lead to the RFC being postponed. [The RFC seems like a promising direction hence we will accept since it] will thus give us immediate experience with the design and help in determining the best final solution.". I propose that there have been enough additional uncertainties raised since then that the original direction is less promising and we should be think about the problem anew.

(a historical note: the first mention of placement (under that name - uninit pointers were earlier) in an RFC AFAIK is [0] in late 2014 (pre-1.0). RFCs since then have built on this base - [1] is a comment in Feb 2015 accepting a more conservative design of the Place* traits - this is back when serde still required aster and seemed to break every other nightly! A lot has changed since then, perhaps placement should too)

------------------------

Concrete unresolved questions include:

 - making placement work in debug mode [7]
 - making placement work for serde/with fallible creation [5], [irlo2], [8]
 - trait design:
   - opting into not consuming the placer in `Placer::make_place` - [2]
   - trait proliferation - [4] (+ others in that thread)
   - fallible allocation - [3], [4] (+ others in that thread)
 - support for DSTs/unsized structs (if at all) - [1], [6]

More speculative unresolved questions include:

 - better trait design with in the context of future language features [irlo1] (Q11), [irlo3]
 - interaction between custom allocators and placement [irlo3]

[0] https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/470
[1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/809#issuecomment-73910414
[2] https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1286
[3] https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1315
[4] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27779#issuecomment-146711893
[5] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27779#issuecomment-285562402
[6] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27779#issuecomment-354464938
[7] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27779#issuecomment-358025344
[8] https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1228#issuecomment-190825370
[irlo1] https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/placement-nwbi-faq-new-box-in-left-arrow/2789
[irlo2] https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/placement-nwbi-faq-new-box-in-left-arrow/2789/19
[irlo3] https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/lang-team-minutes-feature-status-report-placement-in-and-box/4646
2018-04-04 01:06:35 +00:00
bors
c75d5e242f Auto merge of #48647 - alexcrichton:update-sccache, r=kennytm
Update sccache to its master branch

Ideally I'd like to soon enable sccache for rustbuild itself and some of the
stage0 tools, but for that to work we'll need some better Rust support than the
pretty old version we were previously using!
2018-04-03 22:21:37 +00:00
bors
637ac17c52 Auto merge of #49447 - pnkfelix:remove-cfg-const-pat-hack-47295, r=nikomatsakis
Remove adjacent all-const match arm hack.

An old fix for moves-in-guards had a hack for adjacent all-const match arms.

The hack was explained in a comment, which you can see here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/22580/files#diff-402a0fa4b3c6755c5650027c6d4cf1efR497

But hack was incomplete (and thus unsound), as pointed out here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/47295#issuecomment-357108458

Plus, it is likely to be at least tricky to reimplement this hack in
the new NLL borrowck.

So rather than try to preserve the hack, we want to try to just remove
it outright. (At least to see the results of a crater run.)

[breaking-change]

This is a breaking-change, but our hope is that no one is actually
relying on such an extreme special case. (We hypothesize the hack was
originally added to accommodate a file in our own test suite, not code
in the wild.)
2018-04-03 11:50:11 +00:00
bors
b12af86a77 Auto merge of #49348 - bobtwinkles:extend_2pb, r=nikomatsakis
Extend two-phase borrows to apply to method receiver autorefs

Fixes #48598 by permitting two-phase borrows on the autorefs created when functions and methods.
2018-04-03 09:11:35 +00:00
Aidan Hobson Sayers
9b5859aea1 Remove all unstable placement features
Closes #22181, #27779
2018-04-03 11:02:34 +02:00
bors
577d29c10a Auto merge of #49098 - matklad:find_map, r=KodrAus
Add Iterator::find_map

I'd like to propose to add `find_map` method to the `Iterator`: an occasionally useful utility, which relates to `filter_map` in the same way that `find` relates to `filter`.

`find_map` takes an `Option`-returning function, applies it to the elements of the iterator, and returns the first non-`None` result. In other words, `find_map(f) == filter_map(f).next()`.

Why do we want to add a function to the `Iterator`, which can be trivially expressed as a combination of existing ones? Observe that `find(f) == filter(f).next()`, so, by the same logic, `find` itself is unnecessary!

The more positive argument is that desugaring of  `find[_map]` in terms of `filter[_map]().next()` is not super obvious, because the `filter` operation reads as if it is applies to the whole collection, although in reality we are interested only in the first element. That is, the jump from "I need a **single** result" to "let's use a function which maps **many** values to **many** values" is a non-trivial speed-bump, and causes friction when reading and writing code.

Does the need for `find_map` arise in practice? Yes!

* Anecdotally, I've more than once searched the docs for the function with `[T] -> (T -> Option<U>) -> Option<U>` signature.
* The direct cause for this PR was [this](1291c50e86 (r174934173)) discussion in Cargo, which boils down to "there's some pattern that we try to express here, but current approaches looks non-pretty" (and the pattern is `filter_map`
* There are several `filter_map().next` combos in Cargo: [[1]](545a4a2c93/src/cargo/ops/cargo_new.rs (L585)), [[2]](545a4a2c93/src/cargo/core/resolver/mod.rs (L1130)), [[3]](545a4a2c93/src/cargo/ops/cargo_rustc/mod.rs (L1086)).
* I've also needed similar functionality in `Kotlin` several times. There, it is expressed as `mapNotNull {}.firstOrNull`, as can be seen [here](ee8bdb4e07/src/main/kotlin/org/rust/cargo/project/model/impl/CargoProjectImpl.kt (L154)), [here](ee8bdb4e07/src/main/kotlin/org/rust/lang/core/resolve/ImplLookup.kt (L444)) [here](ee8bdb4e07/src/main/kotlin/org/rust/ide/inspections/RsLint.kt (L38)) and [here](ee8bdb4e07/src/main/kotlin/org/rust/cargo/toolchain/RustToolchain.kt (L74)) (and maybe in some other cases as well)

Note that it is definitely not among the most popular functions (it definitely is less popular than `find`), but, for example it (in case of Cargo) seems to be more popular than `rposition` (1 occurrence), `step_by` (zero occurrences) and `nth` (three occurrences as `nth(0)` which probably should be replaced with `next`).

Do we necessary need this function in `std`? Could we move it to itertools? That is possible, but observe that `filter`, `filter_map`, `find` and `find_map` together really form a complete table:

|||
|-------|---------|
| filter| find|
|filter_map|find_map|

It would be somewhat unsatisfying to have one quarter of this table live elsewhere :) Also, if `Itertools` adds an `find_map` method, it would be more difficult to move it to std due to name collision.

Hm, at this point I've searched for `filter_map` the umpteenth time, and, strangely, this time I do find this RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1801. I guess this could be an implementation though? :)

To sum up:

Pro:
  - complete the symmetry with existing method
  - codify a somewhat common non-obvious pattern

Contra:
  - niche use case
  - we can, and do, live without it
2018-04-03 06:28:41 +00:00
Tatsuyuki Ishi
7db854b36f Fix imports 2018-04-03 12:42:36 +09:00
bors
5ee891cfea Auto merge of #49590 - alexcrichton:update-deps, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Bump to 1.27.0

Also update some `Cargo.lock` dependencies, finishing up some final steps of our
[release process]!

This doesn't update the bootstrap compiler just yet but that will come in a
follow-up PR.

[release process]: https://forge.rust-lang.org/release-process.html
2018-04-02 22:37:15 +00:00
Aleksey Kladov
591dd5d992 Add Iterator::find_map 2018-04-03 00:47:00 +03:00
Alex Crichton
e9d898318c Bump to 1.27.0
Also update some `Cargo.lock` dependencies, finishing up some final steps of our
[release process]!

This doesn't update the bootstrap compiler just yet but that will come in a
follow-up PR.

[release process]: https://forge.rust-lang.org/release-process.html
2018-04-02 12:42:44 -07:00
Alex Crichton
64f7e11fc3 Update sccache to its master branch
Ideally I'd like to soon enable sccache for rustbuild itself and some of the
stage0 tools, but for that to work we'll need some better Rust support than the
pretty old version we were previously using!
2018-04-02 12:24:50 -07:00
bors
934902af61 Auto merge of #49252 - Manishearth:easy-feature-flag, r=nikomatsakis
Easy edition feature flag

We no longer gate features on epochs; instead we have a `#![feature(rust_2018_preview)]` that flips on a bunch of features (currently dyn_trait).

Based on #49001 to avoid merge conflicts

r? @nikomatsakis
2018-04-02 18:14:09 +00:00
bors
097efa9a99 Auto merge of #49124 - abonander:attr-macro-stmt-expr, r=abonander
Expand Attributes on Statements and Expressions

This enables attribute-macro expansion on statements and expressions while retaining the `stmt_expr_attributes` feature requirement for attributes on expressions.

closes #41475
cc #38356  @petrochenkov @jseyfried
r? @nrc
2018-04-02 10:38:28 +00:00
Austin Bonander
7c0124dd35 Expand attribute macros on statements and expressions.
Retains the `stmt_expr_attributes` feature requirement for attributes on expressions.

closes #41475
cc #38356
2018-04-02 01:56:12 -07:00
bors
135f334e0a Auto merge of #49580 - glandium:core-heap, r=SimonSapin
Use Alloc and Layout from core::heap.

94d1970bba moved the alloc::allocator
module to core::heap, moving e.g. Alloc and Layout out of the alloc
crate. While alloc::heap reexports them, it's better to use them from
where they really come from.
2018-04-02 08:07:10 +00:00
Mike Hommey
b647583c2d Use Alloc and Layout from core::heap.
94d1970bba moved the alloc::allocator
module to core::heap, moving e.g. Alloc and Layout out of the alloc
crate. While alloc::heap reexports them, it's better to use them from
where they really come from.
2018-04-02 16:06:19 +09:00
bors
73f08719ea Auto merge of #49574 - tmccombs:stabilize-getpid, r=sfackler
Stabilize `std::process::id()`

Fixes #44971
2018-04-02 05:48:33 +00:00
Thayne McCombs
d4f5e89ee0 Stabilize std::process::id()
Fixes #44971
2018-04-01 21:40:56 -06:00
Mike Hommey
98175a8793 Reject huge alignments on macos with system allocator only
ef8804ba27 addressed #30170 by rejecting
huge alignments at the allocator API level, transforming a specific
platform bug/limitation into an enforced API limitation on all
platforms.

This change essentially reverts that commit, and instead makes alloc()
itself return AllocErr::Unsupported when receiving huge alignments.

This was discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32838#issuecomment-368348408
and following.
2018-04-02 12:29:23 +09:00
bors
acad4cc981 Auto merge of #49571 - anderspitman:patch-1, r=frewsxcv
Update drop.rs
2018-04-02 03:24:51 +00:00
Anders Pitman
da9e18b3db
Update drop.rs 2018-04-01 16:19:42 -07:00
bors
06fa27d7c8 Auto merge of #49561 - Mark-Simulacrum:rollup, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Rollup of 3 pull requests

- Successful merges: #49451, #49498, #49549
- Failed merges:
2018-04-01 16:34:27 +00:00
Mark Simulacrum
36f9f76356
Rollup merge of #49549 - Mark-Simulacrum:bootstrap-cleanup, r=alexcrichton
Remove filetime dep from build_helper

r? @alexcrichton
2018-04-01 18:04:57 +02:00
Mark Simulacrum
4799d2eb01
Rollup merge of #49498 - Manishearth:clippyup, r=oli-obk
Update clippy

r? @oli-obk
2018-04-01 18:04:56 +02:00
Mark Simulacrum
5d3916d566
Rollup merge of #49451 - QuietMisdreavus:epoch-doctests, r=GuillaumeGomez
rustdoc: add an --edition flag to compile docs/doctests with a certain edition

To correspond with the 2018 edition, this adds a (currently unstable) `--edition` flag to rustdoc that makes it compile crates and doctests with the given edition. Once this lands, Cargo should be updated to pass this flag when the edition configuration option is given.
2018-04-01 18:04:54 +02:00
bors
d2235f20b5 Auto merge of #49478 - Phlosioneer:fix-windows-file-not-found, r=petrochenkov
Fix escaped backslash in windows file not found message

When a module is declared, but no matching file exists, rustc gives
an error like `help: name the file either foo.rs or foo/mod.rs inside
the directory "src/bar"`. However, at on windows, the backslash was
double-escaped when naming the directory.

It did this because the string was printed in debug mode (`"{:?}"`) to
surround it with quotes. However, it should just be printed like any
other directory in an error message and surrounded by escaped quotes,
rather than relying on the debug print to add quotes (`"\"{}\""`).

I also checked the test suite to see if this output is being correctly tested. It's not - it only tests up to the word "directory". Presumably this is so that the test is not dependent on its exact position in the source tree. I don't know a better way to test this, unless the test suite supports regex?
2018-04-01 12:54:02 +00:00
Mark Simulacrum
86915ddf30 Remove filetime dep from build_helper 2018-04-01 04:49:21 -06:00
bors
cb1f89864e Auto merge of #49418 - frewsxcv:frewsxcv-network-order, r=TimNN
Clarify network byte order conversions for integer / IP address conversions.

Opened primarily to address https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48819.

Also added a few other conversion docs/examples.
2018-04-01 10:09:58 +00:00
bors
85f0098405 Auto merge of #49545 - alexcrichton:proc-macro-fixes, r=eddyb
proc_macro: Tweak doc comments and negative literals

This commit tweaks the tokenization of a doc comment to use `#[doc = "..."]`
like `macro_rules!` does (instead of treating it as a `Literal` token).
Additionally it fixes treatment of negative literals in the compiler, for
exapmle `Literal::i32(-1)`. The current fix is a bit of a hack around the
current compiler implementation, providing a fix at the proc-macro layer rather
than the libsyntax layer.

Closes #48889
2018-04-01 07:22:28 +00:00
bors
804d8c88d9 Auto merge of #49530 - petrhosek:empty-extra-flags, r=cramertj
Only include space in RUSTFLAGS extra flags if not empty

When the RUSTFLAGS_STAGE_{1,2} is not set, including a space means
the string will always be non-empty and RUSTFLAGS will be always be
reset which breaks other ways of setting these such as through config
in CARGO_HOME.
2018-04-01 05:09:48 +00:00
bors
9ceaa5676b Auto merge of #49522 - mbrubeck:fs_read, r=SimonSapin
Rename fs::read_string to read_to_string and stabilize

As approved in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/46588#issuecomment-377530365

Closes #46588.
2018-04-01 02:44:45 +00:00
bors
2b49944006 Auto merge of #49527 - petrhosek:fast-submodules, r=alexcrichton
Handle fast-submodules option correctly

This option was introduced in 72cb109bec, but it uses two different
spellings (`fast-submodule` in `bootstrap.py` vs `fast-submodules` in
`config.toml.example`) and isn't handled by Rust bootstrap which means
that any attempt to set this flag fails.
2018-04-01 00:22:45 +00:00
Alex Crichton
ec1a8f081f proc_macro: Tweak doc comments and negative literals
This commit tweaks the tokenization of a doc comment to use `#[doc = "..."]`
like `macro_rules!` does (instead of treating it as a `Literal` token).
Additionally it fixes treatment of negative literals in the compiler, for
exapmle `Literal::i32(-1)`. The current fix is a bit of a hack around the
current compiler implementation, providing a fix at the proc-macro layer rather
than the libsyntax layer.
2018-03-31 14:16:05 -07:00
bors
517f24025a Auto merge of #49521 - mbrubeck:fs_read_write_bytes, r=TimNN
fs_read_write_bytes stabilized in 1.26.0

Fix the stabilization attributes from #49422 because it merged before 1.26 branched to beta.

r? @TimNN
2018-03-31 17:58:50 +00:00
bors
e38eca6cac Auto merge of #49501 - sfackler:unix-epoch-assoc-const, r=alexcrichton
Make UNIX_EPOCH an associated constant of SystemTime

It's not very discoverable as a separate const in the module.

r? @alexcrichton
2018-03-31 15:33:28 +00:00
bors
70248b1fcf Auto merge of #49500 - oli-obk:mir_dep_graph, r=michaelwoerister
Introduce an edge from a const eval to the MIR of all statics it depends on

r? @michaelwoerister
2018-03-31 12:50:13 +00:00
bors
8dd24c8ed4 Auto merge of #49481 - SimonSapin:core-heap, r=alexcrichton
Move the alloc::allocator module to core::heap

This is the `Alloc` trait and its dependencies.
2018-03-31 09:11:21 +00:00
bors
085c4b43b5 Auto merge of #49201 - Phlosioneer:add-trivial-size-hints, r=SimonSapin
Implement some trivial size_hints for various iterators

This also implements ExactSizeIterator where applicable.

Addresses most of the Iterator traits mentioned in #23708.

I intend to do more, but I don't want to make the PR too large.
2018-03-31 06:40:56 +00:00
Phlosioneer
5057e3c9e1 Commit code for option size hint 2018-03-31 01:13:02 -04:00
bors
3c5f850958 Auto merge of #49472 - nikomatsakis:nll-optimize-constraint-prop-1, r=pnkfelix
optimize NLL constraint propagation a little

Removes a bone-headed hot spot in NLL constant propagation; we were re-allocating the stack vector and hashmap as we repeated the DFS. This change shares those resources across each call.

It also modifies the constraint list to be a linked list; arguably I should revert that, though, as this didn't turn out to be a perf hit and perhaps the old code was clearer? (Still, the new style appeals to me.)

r? @pnkfelix
2018-03-31 04:09:43 +00:00
Petr Hosek
c6bae16dc2 Only include space in RUSTFLAGS extra flags if not empty
When the RUSTFLAGS_STAGE_{1,2} is not set, including a space means
the string will always be non-empty and RUSTFLAGS will be always be
reset which breaks other ways of setting these such as through config
in CARGO_HOME.
2018-03-30 19:37:08 -07:00
bors
1c5283b472 Auto merge of #49459 - GuillaumeGomez:primitive-intra-links, r=QuietMisdreavus
Add primitive intra-links

Part of #43466.

r? @QuietMisdreavus
2018-03-31 01:34:15 +00:00
Petr Hosek
a24811e15a Handle fast-submodules option correctly
This option was introduced in 72cb109bec, but it uses two different
spellings (fast-submodule vs fast-submodules) and isn't handled by
Rust bootstrap which means that any attempt to set this flag fails.
2018-03-30 16:42:57 -07:00
bors
80785a547d Auto merge of #49324 - SimonSapin:unsigned, r=alexcrichton
Deprecate signed std::num::NonZeroI* with a call for use cases

CC https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49137#issuecomment-375823481
2018-03-30 19:11:15 +00:00
Matt Brubeck
6b7627f8c9 Rename fs::read_string to read_to_string and stabilize 2018-03-30 10:20:58 -07:00
Matt Brubeck
504916c18b fs_read_write_bytes stabilized in 1.26.0 2018-03-30 10:07:40 -07:00
bors
f1c21b0e67 Auto merge of #49518 - SimonSapin:prelude, r=alexcrichton
Revert "Add TryFrom and TryInto to the prelude"

This reverts commit 09008cc23f.

This addition landed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/49305 and turned out to break crates that had their own copy of `TryFrom` in order to use it on the Stable channel :(

We’ll explore the possibility of the 2018 edition having a different prelude that includes this traits. However per the editions RFC this requires implementing a warning in the 2015 edition for code that *would* break.
2018-03-30 16:44:15 +00:00