Fix drop scopes problems in mir
Fix false positives of `need-mut` emerged from #14955
There are still 5 `need-mut` false positives on self, all related to `izip!` macro hygenic issue. I will try to do something about that before monday release.
Fix Assist "replace named generic type with impl trait"
This is a follow-up PR to fix the assist "replace named generic type with impl trait" described in #14626 to filter invalid param types. It integrates the feedback given in PR #14816 .
The change updates the logic to determine when a function parameter is safe to replace a type param with its trait implementation. Some parameter definitions are invalid & should not be replaced by their traits, therefore skipping the assist completely.
First, all usages of the generic type under the cursor are determined. These usage references are checked to see if they occur outside the function parameter list. If an outside reference is found, e.g. in body, return type or where clause, the assist is skipped. All remaining usages need to appear only in the function param list. For each usage the param type is further inspected to see if it's valid. The logic to determine if a function parameter is valid, follows a heuristic and may not cover all possible parameter definitions.
With this change the following param types (as given in [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/14816#discussion_r1206834603)) are not replaced & therefore skip the assist.
```rust
fn foo<P: Trait>(
_: <P as Trait>::Assoc, // within path type qualifier
_: <() as OtherTrait<P>>::Assoc, // same as above
_: P::Assoc, // associated type shorthand
_: impl OtherTrait<P> // generic arg in impl trait (note that associated type bindings are fine)
_: &dyn Fn(P) // param type and/or return type for Fn* traits
) {}
```
The change updates the logic to determine if a function parameter is
valid for replacing the type param with the trait implementation.
First all usages are determined, to check if they are used outside the function
parameter list. If an outside reference is found, e.g. in body, return type or
where clause, the assist is skipped. All remaining usages only appear in the
function param list. For each usage the param type is checked to see if
it's valid.
**Please note** the logic currently follows a heuristic and may not cover
all existing parameter declarations.
* determine valid usage references by checking ancestors (on AST level)
* split test into separate ones
fix: Fix nav target calculation discarding file ids from differing macro upmapping
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/14792
Turns out there was the assumption that upmapping from a macro will always end in the same root file, which is no longer the case thanks to `include!`
Add signature help for tuple patterns and expressions
~~These are somewhat wonky since their signature changes as you type depending on context but they help out nevertheless.~~ should be less wonky now with added parser and lowering recoveries
fix: Don't duplicate sysroot crates in rustc workspace
Since we handle `library` as the sysroot source directly in the rustc workspace, we now duplicate the crates there, once as sysroot and once as just plain workspace crate. This causes a variety of issues for `vec!` macros and similar that emit `$crate` tokens across crates.
Prioritize threads affected by user typing
To this end I’ve introduced a new custom thread pool type which can spawn threads using each QoS class. This way we can run latency-sensitive requests under one QoS class and everything else under another QoS class. The implementation is very similar to that of the `threadpool` crate (which is currently used by rust-analyzer) but with unused functionality stripped out.
I’ll have to rebase on master once #14859 is merged but I think everything else is alright :D
Fix edits for `convert_named_struct_to_tuple_struct`
Two fixes:
- When replacing syntax nodes, macro files weren't taken into account. Edits were simply made for `node.syntax().text_range()`, which would be wrong range when `node` is inside a macro file.
- We do ancestor node traversal for every struct name reference to find record expressions/patterns to edit, but we didn't verify that expressions/patterns do actually refer to the struct we're operating on.
Best reviewed one commit at a time.
Fixes#13780Fixes#14927
Previously we didn't verify that record expressions/patterns that were
found did actually point to the struct we're operating on. Moreover,
when that record expressions/patterns had missing child nodes, we would
continue traversing their ancestor nodes.
