Use pathdiff crate
I wanted to tackle a simple issue, and stumbled upon #67108: this pr removes the function which was exported to the external crate as required in the todo/issue.
I've tested it with:
```
./x.py build --stage 1 --keep-stage 1 src/librustc_codegen_ssa
```
And it looks like it's compiling
Use intra-doc links in `str` and `BTreeSet`
Fixes#32129, fixes #32130
A _slight_ degradation in quality is that the `#method.foo` links would previously link to the same page on `String`'s documentation, and now they will navigate to `str`. Not a big deal IMO, and we can also try to improve that.
Fix `Safety` docs for `from_raw_parts_mut`
This aligns the wording more with the documentation of e.g. `drop_in_place`, `replace`, `swap` and `swap_nonoverlapping` from `core::ptr`.
Also if the pointer were really only valid for writes, it would be trivial to introduce UB from safe code, after calling `core::slice::from_raw_parts_mut`.
improper_ctypes_definitions: allow `Box`
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72700#issuecomment-659449386.
This PR stops linting against `Box` in `extern "C" fn`s for the `improper_ctypes_definitions` lint - boxes are documented to be FFI-safe.
cc @alexcrichton @CryZe
bootstrap.py: patch RPATH on NixOS to handle the new zlib dependency.
This is a stop-gap until #74420 is resolved (assuming we'll patch beta to statically link zlib).
However, I've been meaning to rewrite the NixOS support we have in `bootstrap.py` for a while now, and had to in order to cleanly add zlib as a dependency (the second commit is a relatively small delta in functionality, compared to the first).
Previously, we would extract the `ld-linux.so` path from the output of `ldd /run/current-system/sw/bin/sh`, which assumes a lot. On top of that we didn't use any symlinks, which meant if the user ran GC (`nix-collect-garbage`), e.g. after updating their system, their `stage0` binaries would suddenly be broken (i.e. referring to files that no longer exist).
We were also using `patchelf` directly, assuming it can be found in `$PATH` (which is not necessarily true).
My new approach relies on using `nix-build` to get the following "derivations" (packages, more or less):
* `stdenv.cc.bintools`, which has a `nix-support/dynamic-linker` file containing the path to `ld-linux.so`
* reading this file is [the canonical way to run `patchelf --set-interpreter`](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/search?l=Nix&q=%22--set-interpreter+%24%28cat+%24NIX_CC%2Fnix-support%2Fdynamic-linker%29%22)
* `patchelf` (so that the user doesn't need to have it installed)
* `zlib`, for the `libz.so` dependency of `libLLVM-*.so` (until #74420 is resolved, presumably)
This is closer to how software is built on Nix, but I've tried to keep it as simple as possible (and not add e.g. a `stage0.nix` file).
Symlinks to each of those dependencies are kept in `stage0/.nix-deps`, which prevents GC from invalidating `stage0` binaries.
r? @nagisa cc @Mark-Simulacrum @oli-obk @davidtwco
ci: Set `shell: bash` as a default, remove duplicates
A follow-up to #74406, this commit merely removes the `shell: bash` lines where they were added in favor of setting defaults for *all* "run" steps in the jobs that run the tests.
The changes in #74406 were needed because of an upstream change to the `windows-2019` GitHub Actions image. Previously, the configuration worked fine without specifying `shell: bash`, but for some reason this broke with a new change that was deployed today. The preceding PR was a hotfix to get CI passing, but there was a slightly less duplicative way to specify the default shell for the jobs, which was to set the `defaults.run` option.
This change applies to the `pr`, `try`, `auto`, and `auto-fallible` jobs, which are derived from the YAML-anchor `base-ci-job`. I did not apply these changes to the `master`, `try-success`, `try-failure`, `auto-success`, or `auto-failure` jobs because they have only a few steps.
cc/r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Compare tagged/niche-filling layout and pick the best one
Finishes up #71045, and so fixes#63866.
cc @eddyb
r? @nikomatsakis (since @eddyb wrote the first commit)
Add lazy initialization primitives to std
Follow-up to #68198
Current RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2788
Rebased and fixed up a few of the dangling comments. Some notes carried over from the previous PR:
- [ ] Naming. I'm ok to just roll with the `Sync` prefix like `SyncLazy` for now, but [have a personal preference for `Atomic`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2788#issuecomment-574466983) like `AtomicLazy`.
- [x] [Poisoning](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2788#discussion_r366725768). It seems like there's [some regret around poisoning in other `std::sync` types that we might want to just avoid upfront for `std::lazy`, especially if that would align with a future `std::mutex` that doesn't poison](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/parking_lot.3A.3AMutex.20in.20std/near/190331199). Personally, if we're adding these types to `std::lazy` instead of `std::sync`, I'd be on-board with not worrying about poisoning in `std::lazy`, and potentially deprecating `std::sync::Once` and `lazy_static` in favour of `std::lazy` down the track if it's possible, rather than attempting to replicate their behavior. cc @Amanieu @sfackler.
- [ ] [Consider making`SyncOnceCell::get` blocking](https://github.com/matklad/once_cell/pull/92). There doesn't seem to be consensus in the linked PR on whether or not that's strictly better than the non-blocking variant.
In general, none of these seem to be really blocking an initial unstable merge, so we could possibly kick off a FCP if y'all are happy?
cc @matklad @pitdicker have I missed anything, or were there any other considerations that have come up since we last looked at this?
intra-doc links: resolve modules in the type namespace
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62830
Modules actually live in the type namespace, not all three, and it's not possible to clash a type with a module.
Fix Arc::as_ptr docs
As a non-native speaker I stumbled upon this, looked it up and couldn't find a phrase, so I made my own assumption that "in any way" was meant (which is the meaning I would've deduced anyway)
Move hir::Place to librustc_middle/hir
Needed to support https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/7
Currently rustc_typeck depends on rustc_middle for definition TypeckTables, etc.
For supporting project-rfc-2229#7, rustc_middle would've to depend on
rustc_typeck for Place -- introducing a circular dependency.
This resembles the MIR equivalent of `Place` located in `lbrustc_middle/mir`.
Separate PR for this move will make the actual PR for using Places to represent captures cleaner/more focused.
r? @nikomatsakis @matthewjasper
Teach bootstrap about target files vs target triples
`rustc` allows passing in predefined target triples as well as JSON
target specification files. This change allows bootstrap to have the
first inkling about those differences. This allows building a
cross-compiler for an out-of-tree architecture (even though that
compiler won't work for other reasons).
Even if no one ever uses this functionality, I think the newtype
around the `Interned<String>` improves the readability of the code.
Stop processing unreachable blocks when solving dataflow
...instead we `debug_assert` that the user is not checking the dataflow state for an unreachable block. This resolves a FIXME in the dataflow engine. The old behavior was an artifact of the previous dataflow framework. Things should run a tiny bit faster now, but I suspect not enough to show up in benchmarks. AFAIK, only the generator transform runs dataflow on MIR with unreachable basic blocks.
This PR also adds some utility methods to `mir::traversal`.
r? @pnkfelix
Add Arguments::as_str().
There exist quite a few macros in the Rust ecosystem which use `format_args!()` for formatting, but special case the one-argument case for optimization:
```rust
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! some_macro {
($s:expr) => { /* print &str directly, no formatting, no buffers */ };
($s:expr, $($tt:tt)*) => { /* use format_args to write to a buffer first */ }
}
```
E.g. [here](7a961f0fbe/src/macros.rs (L48-L58)), [here](20f9a9e223/src/macros.rs (L9-L17)), and [here](7b679cd6da/px4/src/logging.rs (L45-L52)).
The problem with these is that a forgotten argument such as in `some_macro!("{}")` will not be diagnosed, but just prints `"{}"`.
With this PR, it is possible to handle the no-arguments case separately *after* `format_args!()`, while simplifying the macro. Then these macros can give the proper error about a missing argument, just like `print!("{}")` does, while still using the same optimized implementation as before.
This is even more important with [RFC 2795](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2795), to make sure `some_macro!("{some_variable}")` works as expected.
Fix MinGW `run-make-fulldeps` tests
`compiler-rt-works-on-mingw` and `libs-search-path` were not ran because `only-mingw` doesn't match any target.
Enabled and verified few ignored tests with `windows-gnu` toolchain. They are still ignored on MSVC since I'm not experienced with this target.
Make some Option methods const
Tracking issue: #67441
Constantify the following methods of `Option`:
- `as_ref`
- `is_some`
- `is_none`
- `iter` (not sure about this one, but it is possible, and will be useful when const traits are a thing)
cc @rust-lang/wg-const-eval @rust-lang/libs
Enforce even more the code blocks attributes check through rustdoc
`rustdoc` now has a lint which allows it to warn if a code block attribute is malformated (which can end up in bad situations, even more in case of testing examples!). Now it'll fail if such a situation is encountered when testing markdown code blocks examples.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
This commit stops linting against `Box` in `extern "C" fn`s for the
`improper_ctypes_definitions` lint - boxes are documented to be
FFI-safe.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
When ran on Windows `cp` will follow symlink: `checkout/build/<target>/<stage>/lib/rustlib/src/rust`.
It points to `checkout` which means the test will get stuck in copying loop until there is no space left.
