390 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oli Scherer
8206cffc48 Merge check_mod_impl_wf and check_mod_type_wf 2024-03-07 06:27:09 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
34cffae24c
Rollup merge of #122027 - compiler-errors:rpitit-cycle, r=spastorino
Uplift some feeding out of `associated_type_for_impl_trait_in_impl` and into queries

This PR moves the `type_of` and `generics_of` query feeding out of `associated_type_for_impl_trait_in_impl`, since eagerly feeding results in query cycles due to a subtle interaction with `resolve_bound_vars`.

Fixes #122019

r? spastorino
2024-03-06 22:41:55 +01:00
bors
09bc67b915 Auto merge of #121679 - lcnr:opaque-wf-check-2, r=oli-obk
stricter hidden type wf-check [based on #115008]

Original work by `@aliemjay` in #115008. A huge thanks to them for originally figuring out this approach ❤️

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114728
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114572

Instead of adding the `WellFormed` obligations when relating opaque types, we now always emit such an obligation when defining the hidden type.

This causes nested opaque types which aren't wf to error, see the comment below for the described impact. I believe this change to be desirable as it significantly reduces complexity by removing special-cases.

It also caused an issue with RPITIT: in defaulted trait methods, we add a `Projection(synthetic_assoc, rpit_of_trait_method)` clause to the `param_env`. This clause is not added to the `ParamEnv` of the nested coroutines. This caused a normalization failure in `fn check_coroutine_obligations` with the new solver. I fixed that by using the env of the typeck root instead.

r? `@oli-obk`
2024-03-06 10:04:26 +00:00
Michael Goulet
ebc45c8505 Uplift some feeding out of associated_type_for_impl_trait_in_impl and into queries 2024-03-05 15:55:31 +00:00
Esteban Küber
f0c93117ed Use root obligation on E0277 for some cases
When encountering trait bound errors that satisfy some heuristics that
tell us that the relevant trait for the user comes from the root
obligation and not the current obligation, we use the root predicate for
the main message.

This allows to talk about "X doesn't implement Pattern<'_>" over the
most specific case that just happened to fail, like  "char doesn't
implement Fn(&mut char)" in
`tests/ui/traits/suggest-dereferences/root-obligation.rs`

The heuristics are:

 - the type of the leaf predicate is (roughly) the same as the type
   from the root predicate, as a proxy for "we care about the root"
 - the leaf trait and the root trait are different, so as to avoid
   talking about `&mut T: Trait` and instead remain talking about
   `T: Trait` instead
 - the root trait is not `Unsize`, as to avoid talking about it in
   `tests/ui/coercion/coerce-issue-49593-box-never.rs`.

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&char: Pattern<'_>` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/root-obligation.rs:6:38
   |
LL |         .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(c))
   |                             -------- ^ the trait `Fn<(char,)>` is not implemented for `&char`, which is required by `&char: Pattern<'_>`
   |                             |
   |                             required by a bound introduced by this call
   |
   = note: required for `&char` to implement `FnOnce<(char,)>`
   = note: required for `&char` to implement `Pattern<'_>`
note: required by a bound in `core::str::<impl str>::contains`
  --> $SRC_DIR/core/src/str/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider dereferencing here
   |
LL |         .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(*c))
   |                                      +
```

Fix #79359, fix #119983, fix #118779, cc #118415 (the suggestion needs
to change).
2024-03-03 18:53:35 +00:00
Guillaume Boisseau
200019c199
Rollup merge of #121731 - oli-obk:eager_opaque_checks, r=compiler-errors
Now that inlining, mir validation and const eval all use reveal-all, we won't be constraining hidden types here anymore

r? `@compiler-errors`

one bubble down, two more to go

the test is unrelated, just something I noticed would be good to test in both the old solver and the new.
2024-03-02 20:13:23 +01:00
Guillaume Gomez
a5945b5d8d
Rollup merge of #121669 - nnethercote:count-stashed-errs-again, r=estebank
Count stashed errors again

Stashed diagnostics are such a pain. Their "might be emitted, might not" semantics messes with lots of things.

#120828 and #121206 made some big changes to how they work, improving some things, but still leaving some problems, as seen by the issues caused by #121206. This PR aims to fix all of them by restricting them in a way that eliminates the "might be emitted, might not" semantics while still allowing 98% of their benefit. Details in the individual commit logs.

r? `@oli-obk`
2024-02-29 17:08:38 +01:00
Jacob Pratt
23351388d0
Rollup merge of #121745 - compiler-errors:refining-impl-trait-deeply-norm, r=lcnr
Deeply normalize obligations in `refining_impl_trait`

We somewhat awkwardly use semantic comparison when checking the `refining_impl_trait` lint. This relies on us being able to normalize bounds eagerly to avoid cases where an unnormalized alias is not considered equal to a normalized alias. Since `normalize` in the new solver is a noop, let's use `deeply_normalize` instead.

r? lcnr

cc ``@tmandry,`` this should fix your bug lol
2024-02-29 05:25:28 -05:00
Nicholas Nethercote
260ae70140 Overhaul how stashed diagnostics work, again.
Stashed errors used to be counted as errors, but could then be
cancelled, leading to `ErrorGuaranteed` soundness holes. #120828 changed
that, closing the soundness hole. But it introduced other difficulties
because you sometimes have to account for pending stashed errors when
making decisions about whether errors have occured/will occur and it's
easy to overlook these.

This commit aims for a middle ground.
- Stashed errors (not warnings) are counted immediately as emitted
  errors, avoiding the possibility of forgetting to consider them.
- The ability to cancel (or downgrade) stashed errors is eliminated, by
  disallowing the use of `steal_diagnostic` with errors, and introducing
  the more restrictive methods `try_steal_{modify,replace}_and_emit_err`
  that can be used instead.

Other things:
- `DiagnosticBuilder::stash` and `DiagCtxt::stash_diagnostic` now both
  return `Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`, which enables the removal of two
  `delayed_bug` calls and one `Ty::new_error_with_message` call. This is
  possible because we store error guarantees in
  `DiagCtxt::stashed_diagnostics`.
- Storing the guarantees also saves us having to maintain a counter.
- Calls to the `stashed_err_count` method are no longer necessary
  alongside calls to `has_errors`, which is a nice simplification, and
  eliminates two more `span_delayed_bug` calls and one FIXME comment.
- Tests are added for three of the four fixed PRs mentioned below.
- `issue-121108.rs`'s output improved slightly, omitting a non-useful
  error message.

Fixes #121451.
Fixes #121477.
Fixes #121504.
Fixes #121508.
2024-02-29 11:08:27 +11:00
Michael Goulet
75e15f7cf4 Deeply normalize obligations in refining_impl_trait 2024-02-28 16:09:29 +00:00
Oli Scherer
c86974d94f test that fudging with opaque types is the same in the new solver 2024-02-28 09:54:44 +00:00
Michael Goulet
b57ddfe079 Print RPITIT like an opaque 2024-02-27 17:43:40 +00:00
Michael Goulet
1feef44daf rename RPITIT from opaque to synthetic 2024-02-27 17:43:40 +00:00
lcnr
71d82c2899 when defining opaques, require the hidden type to be well-formed 2024-02-27 15:57:49 +01:00
lcnr
93bc7a428c wf-check RPITs 2024-02-27 15:00:22 +01:00
lcnr
2c7ede8f52 update tests 2024-02-26 10:57:46 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
b10ef3c6bc
Rollup merge of #121435 - estebank:rpitit-static-119773, r=compiler-errors
Account for RPITIT in E0310 explicit lifetime constraint suggestion

When given

```rust
trait Original {
    fn f() -> impl Fn();
}

trait Erased {
    fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()>;
}

impl<T: Original> Erased for T {
    fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()> {
        Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
    }
}
```

emit do not emit an invalid suggestion restricting the `Trait::{opaque}` type in a `where` clause:

```
error[E0310]: the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` may not live long enough
  --> $DIR/missing-static-bound-from-impl.rs:11:9
   |
LL |         Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |         |
   |         the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` must be valid for the static lifetime...
   |         ...so that the type `impl Fn()` will meet its required lifetime bounds
```

Partially address #119773. Ideally we'd suggest modifying `Erased::f` instead.

r? `@compiler-errors`
2024-02-24 15:35:12 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
5de3a4ce0e
Rollup merge of #121480 - nnethercote:fix-more-121208-fallout, r=lcnr
Fix more #121208 fallout

#121208 converted lots of delayed bugs to bugs. Unsurprisingly, there were a few invalid conversion found via fuzzing.

r? `@lcnr`
2024-02-23 09:42:12 +01:00
bors
a28d221a4b Auto merge of #120730 - estebank:confusable-api, r=oli-obk
Provide suggestions through `rustc_confusables` annotations

Help with common API confusion, like asking for `push` when the data structure really has `append`.

```
error[E0599]: no method named `size` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:17:7
   |
LL |     x.size();
   |       ^^^^
   |
help: you might have meant to use `len`
   |
LL |     x.len();
   |       ~~~
help: there is a method with a similar name
   |
LL |     x.resize();
   |       ~~~~~~
```

Fix #59450 (we can open subsequent tickets for specific cases).

Fix #108437:

```
error[E0599]: `Option<{integer}>` is not an iterator
   --> f101.rs:3:9
    |
3   |     opt.flat_map(|val| Some(val));
    |         ^^^^^^^^ `Option<{integer}>` is not an iterator
    |
   ::: /home/gh-estebank/rust/library/core/src/option.rs:571:1
    |
571 | pub enum Option<T> {
    | ------------------ doesn't satisfy `Option<{integer}>: Iterator`
    |
    = note: the following trait bounds were not satisfied:
            `Option<{integer}>: Iterator`
            which is required by `&mut Option<{integer}>: Iterator`
help: you might have meant to use `and_then`
    |
3   |     opt.and_then(|val| Some(val));
    |         ~~~~~~~~
```

On type error of method call arguments, look at confusables for suggestion. Fix #87212:

```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
    --> f101.rs:8:18
     |
8    |     stuff.append(Thing);
     |           ------ ^^^^^ expected `&mut Vec<Thing>`, found `Thing`
     |           |
     |           arguments to this method are incorrect
     |
     = note: expected mutable reference `&mut Vec<Thing>`
                           found struct `Thing`
note: method defined here
    --> /home/gh-estebank/rust/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:2025:12
     |
2025 |     pub fn append(&mut self, other: &mut Self) {
     |            ^^^^^^
help: you might have meant to use `push`
     |
8    |     stuff.push(Thing);
     |           ~~~~
```
2024-02-23 00:42:56 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
109321ac47 Revert some span_bugs to span_delayed_bug.
Fixes #121445.
Fixes #121457.
2024-02-23 10:04:32 +11:00
Esteban Küber
5e6da720f6 Account for RPITIT in E0310 explicit lifetime constraint suggestion
When given

```rust
trait Original {
    fn f() -> impl Fn();
}

trait Erased {
    fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()>;
}

impl<T: Original> Erased for T {
    fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()> {
        Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
    }
}
```

avoid suggestion to restrict the `Trait::{opaque}` type in a `where` clause:

```
error[E0310]: the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` may not live long enough
  --> $DIR/missing-static-bound-from-impl.rs:11:9
   |
LL |         Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |         |
   |         the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` must be valid for the static lifetime...
   |         ...so that the type `impl Fn()` will meet its required lifetime bounds
```

CC #119773.
2024-02-22 18:56:07 +00:00
Esteban Küber
91d0b371ef Fix rebase 2024-02-22 18:38:10 +00:00
Esteban Küber
28c028737d Deduplicate some logic and reword output 2024-02-22 18:05:28 +00:00
Esteban Küber
caa216d245 Tweak wording of "implemented trait isn't imported" suggestion 2024-02-22 18:05:27 +00:00
Esteban Küber
385eea1d46 Consider methods from traits when suggesting typos
Do not provide a structured suggestion when the arguments don't match.

```
error[E0599]: no method named `test_mut` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/auto-ref-slice-plus-ref.rs:7:7
   |
LL |     a.test_mut();
   |       ^^^^^^^^
   |
   = help: items from traits can only be used if the trait is implemented and in scope
note: `MyIter` defines an item `test_mut`, perhaps you need to implement it
  --> $DIR/auto-ref-slice-plus-ref.rs:14:1
   |
LL | trait MyIter {
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: there is a method `get_mut` with a similar name, but with different arguments
  --> $SRC_DIR/core/src/slice/mod.rs:LL:COL
```

Consider methods beyond inherent ones when suggesting typos.

```
error[E0599]: no method named `owned` found for reference `&dyn Foo` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/object-pointer-types.rs:11:7
   |
LL |     fn owned(self: Box<Self>);
   |                    --------- the method might not be found because of this arbitrary self type
...
LL |     x.owned();
   |       ^^^^^ help: there is a method with a similar name: `to_owned`
```

Fix #101013.
2024-02-22 18:04:55 +00:00
lcnr
c71484eefd change error messages to be incorrect, but more helpful 2024-02-22 18:18:33 +01:00
lcnr
49dc0f22f4 do not use <: in subtyping overflow msg 2024-02-22 17:43:59 +01:00
lcnr
f7cdff825c overflow errors: change source to a concrete enum 2024-02-22 17:43:57 +01:00
lcnr
f392a870e9 freshen: resolve root vars
Without doing so we use the same candidate cache entry
for `?0: Trait<?1>` and `?0: Trait<?0>`. These goals are different
and we must not use the same entry for them.
2024-02-22 17:29:26 +01:00
lcnr
91535ad026 remove sub_relations from infcx, recompute in diagnostics
we don't track them when canonicalizing or when freshening,
resulting in instable caching in the old solver, and issues when
instantiating query responses in the new one.
2024-02-22 17:29:25 +01:00
Nicholas Nethercote
72b172bdf6 Overhaul the handling of errors at the top-level.
Currently `emit_stashed_diagnostic` is called from four(!) different
places: `print_error_count`, `DiagCtxtInner::drop`, `abort_if_errors`,
and `compile_status`.

And `flush_delayed` is called from two different places:
`DiagCtxtInner::drop` and `Queries`.

This is pretty gross! Each one should really be called from a single
place, but there's a bunch of entanglements. This commit cleans up this
mess.

Specifically, it:
- Removes all the existing calls to `emit_stashed_diagnostic`, and adds
  a single new call in `finish_diagnostics`.
- Removes the early `flush_delayed` call in `codegen_and_build_linker`,
  replacing it with a simple early return if delayed bugs are present.
- Changes `DiagCtxtInner::drop` and `DiagCtxtInner::flush_delayed` so
  they both assert that the stashed diagnostics are empty (i.e.
  processed beforehand).
- Changes `interface::run_compiler` so that any errors emitted during
  `finish_diagnostics` (i.e. late-emitted stashed diagnostics) are
  counted and cannot be overlooked. This requires adding
  `ErrorGuaranteed` return values to several functions.
- Removes the `stashed_err_count` call in `analysis`. This is possible
  now that we don't have to worry about calling `flush_delayed` early
  from `codegen_and_build_linker` when stashed diagnostics are pending.
- Changes the `span_bug` case in `handle_tuple_field_pattern_match` to a
  `delayed_span_bug`, because it now can be reached due to the removal
  of the `stashed_err_count` call in `analysis`.
- Slightly changes the expected output of three tests. If no errors are
  emitted but there are delayed bugs, the error count is no longer
  printed. This is because delayed bugs are now always printed after the
  error count is printed (or not printed, if the error count is zero).

There is a lot going on in this commit. It's hard to break into smaller
pieces because the existing code is very tangled. It took me a long time
and a lot of effort to understand how the different pieces interact, and
I think the new code is a lot simpler and easier to understand.
2024-02-22 08:03:47 +11:00
Nilstrieb
599768d930
Rollup merge of #121319 - compiler-errors:err, r=oli-obk
return `ty::Error` when equating `ty::Error`

This helps iron out a difference in diagnostics between `Sub` and `Equate` relations, which I'm currently trying to unify.

r? oli-obk
2024-02-20 07:35:49 +01:00
Michael Goulet
84baf2f6f8 return ty::Error when equating ty::Error
This helps iron out a difference between Sub and Equate
2024-02-19 23:54:49 +00:00
bors
0395fa387a Auto merge of #121211 - lcnr:nll-relate-handle-infer, r=BoxyUwU
deduplicate infer var instantiation

Having 3 separate implementations of one of the most subtle parts of our type system is not a good strategy if we want to maintain a sound type system  while working on this I already found some subtle bugs in the existing code, so that's awesome 🎉 cc #121159

This was necessary as I am not confident in my nll changes in #119106, so I am first cleaning this up in a separate PR.

r? `@BoxyUwU`
2024-02-19 22:04:58 +00:00
lcnr
5c540044d6 use instantiate_ty_var in nll
we already use `instantiate_const_var`. This does lose some debugging
info for nll because we stop populating the `reg_var_to_origin` table with
`RegionCtxt::Existential(None)`, I don't think that matters however.
Supporting this adds additional complexity to one of the most involved
parts of the type system, so I really don't think it's worth it.
2024-02-17 02:32:19 +01:00
许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)
ec2cc761bc
[AUTO-GENERATED] Migrate ui tests from // to //@ directives 2024-02-16 20:02:50 +00:00
Oli Scherer
c1bb352c8b Continue compilation even if inherent impl checks fail 2024-02-14 21:04:51 +00:00
bors
ee9c7c940c Auto merge of #120847 - oli-obk:track_errors9, r=compiler-errors
Continue compilation after check_mod_type_wf errors

The ICEs fixed here were probably reachable through const eval gymnastics before, but now they are easily reachable without that, too.

The new errors are often bugfixes, where useful errors were missing, because they were reported after the early abort. In other cases sometimes they are just duplication of already emitted errors, which won't be user-visible due to deduplication.

fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120860
2024-02-14 18:32:19 +00:00
Oli Scherer
5f6390f947 Continue compilation after check_mod_type_wf errors 2024-02-14 11:00:30 +00:00
Oli Scherer
c4371a79de
Rollup merge of #120530 - trevyn:issue-116434, r=compiler-errors
Be less confident when `dyn` suggestion is not checked for object safety

#120275 no longer checks bare traits for object safety when making a `dyn` suggestion on Rust < 2021. In this case, qualify the suggestion with a note that the trait must be object safe, to prevent user confusion as seen in #116434

r? ```@fmease```
2024-02-14 11:53:39 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
65ab663266
Rollup merge of #120549 - lcnr:errs-showcase, r=compiler-errors
modify alias-relate to also normalize ambiguous opaques

allows a bunch of further cleanups and generally simplifies the type system. To handle https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/8 we'll have to add a some additional complexity to the `(Alias, Infer)` branches in alias-relate, so removing the opaque type special case here is really valuable.

It does worsen `deduce_closure_signature` and friends even more as they now receive an inference variable which is only constrained via an `AliasRelate` goal. These probably have to look into alias relate goals somehow. Leaving that for a future PR as this is something we'll have to tackle regardless.

r? `@compiler-errors`
2024-02-13 17:38:10 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
020e84652d
Rollup merge of #120696 - estebank:issue-115405, r=oli-obk
Properly handle `async` block and `async fn` in `if` exprs without `else`

When encountering a tail expression in the then arm of an `if` expression without an `else` arm, account for `async fn` and `async` blocks to suggest `return`ing the value and pointing at the return type of the `async fn`.

We now also account for AFIT when looking for the return type to point at.

Fix #115405.
2024-02-13 06:27:37 +01:00
lcnr
3e3e207ad7 use alias-relate to structurally normalize in the solver 2024-02-13 05:08:51 +01:00
Esteban Küber
37d2ea2fa0 Properly handle async blocks and fns in if exprs without else
When encountering a tail expression in the then arm of an `if` expression
without an `else` arm, account for `async fn` and `async` blocks to
suggest `return`ing the value and pointing at the return type of the
`async fn`.

We now also account for AFIT when looking for the return type to point at.

Fix #115405.
2024-02-12 20:26:34 +00:00
Michael Goulet
5461fd4250 Gracefully handle non-WF alias in assemble_alias_bound_candidates_recur 2024-02-10 23:49:21 +00:00
trevyn
29fd82b24e Be less confident when dyn suggestion is not checked for object safety 2024-02-09 20:47:50 -08:00
Matthias Krüger
f41d0d90c2
Rollup merge of #113671 - oli-obk:normalize_weak_tys, r=petrochenkov
Make privacy visitor use types more (instead of HIR)

r? ``@petrochenkov``

This is a prerequisite to normalizing projections, as otherwise we have too many invalid bound vars (hir_ty_to_ty is creating types that have bound vars, but no binder).

The commits are still chaotic, I'm gonna clean them up, but I just wanted to let you know about the general direction and wondering if we could land this before adding normalization, as normalization is where behavioral changes happen, and I'd like to keep that part as minimal as possible.

[context can be found on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/315482-t-compiler.2Fetc.2Fopaque-types/topic/weak.20type.20aliases.20and.20privacy)
2024-02-09 14:41:48 +01:00
Oli Scherer
eab2adb660 Continue to borrowck even if there were previous errors 2024-02-08 08:10:43 +00:00
Oli Scherer
4389a1cc42 Stop using hir_ty_to_ty in rustc_privacy 2024-02-07 14:59:26 +00:00
r0cky
c7519d42c2 Update tests 2024-02-07 10:42:01 +08:00