9734: semantic highlighting: add reference hlmod r=matklad a=jhgg
This PR adds the "reference" highlight modifier!
I basically went around and looked for `HlMod::Mutable` to find the callsites to add a reference. I think these all make sense!
Co-authored-by: Jake Heinz <jh@discordapp.com>
Co-authored-by: Jake <jh@discordapp.com>
9637: Overhaul doc_links testing infra r=Veykril a=Veykril
and fix several issues with current implementation.
Fixes#9617
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
Definition::visibility was implemented in a rather roundabout way -- by
asking the parent module about the effective visibility.
This is problematic for a couple of reasons:
* first, it doesn't work for local items
* second, asking module about visibility of a child is a linear
operation (that's a problem in itself, tracked in #9378)
Instead, lets ask the declared visibility directly, we have all the code
for it, and need only to actually us it.
The completion of cfg will look at the enabled cfg keys when
performing completion.
It will also look crate features when completing a feature cfg
option. A fixed list of known values for some cfg options are
provided.
For unknown keys it will look at the enabled values for that cfg key,
which means that completion will only show enabled options for those.
9260: tree-wide: make rustdoc links spiky so they are clickable r=matklad a=lf-
Rustdoc was complaining about these while I was running with --document-private-items and I figure they should be fixed.
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
At the moment, this moves only a single diagnostic, but the idea is
reafactor the rest to use the same pattern. We are going to have a
single file per diagnostic. This file will define diagnostics code,
rendering range and fixes, if any. It'll also have all of the tests.
This is similar to how we deal with assists.
After we refactor all diagnostics to follow this pattern, we'll probably
move them to a new `ide_diagnostics` crate.
Not that we intentionally want to test all diagnostics on this layer,
despite the fact that they are generally emitted in the guts on the
compiler. Diagnostics care to much about the end presentation
details/fixes to be worth-while "unit" testing. So, we'll unit-test only
the primary output of compilation process (types and name res tables),
and will use integrated UI tests for diagnostics.
9181: Don't complete values in type position r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
Will add some proper tests in a bit
9182: fix: don't complete derive macros as fn-like macros r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Part of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8518
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
9169: internal: steps towards attribute macro token mapping r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This doesn't work yet, but we seem to be getting a bit further along (for example, we now stop highlighting `use` items inside item with attribute macros as if they were written verbatim).
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
e.g. if you have a trait T and `impl T for S` for some struct, if you
goto definition on some function name inside the impl, it will go to the
definition of that function inside the `trait T` block, rather than the
current behaviour of not going anywhere at all.
8866: Update salsa r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This updates salsa to include https://github.com/salsa-rs/salsa/pull/265, and removes all cancellation-related code from rust-analyzer
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
8997: internal: stop expanding UseTrees during ItemTree lowering r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8908
Messy diff, but `ItemTree` lowering got simpler, since we now have a strict 1-to-1 mapping between `ast::Item` and `ModItem`.
The most messy part is mapping a single `UseTree` back to its `ast::UseTree` counterpart for diagnostics, but I think the ad-hoc source map built during lowering does the job.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
The idea here is to eventually get rid of `dyn Diagnostic` and
`DiagnosticSink` infrastructure altogether, and just have a `enum
hir::Diagnostic` instead.
The problem with `dyn Diagnostic` is that it is defined in the lowest
level of the stack (hir_expand), but is used by the highest level (ide).
As a first step, we free hir_expand and hir_def from `dyn Diagnostic`
and kick the can up to `hir_ty`, as an intermediate state. The plan is
then to move DiagnosticSink similarly to the hir crate, and, as final
third step, remove its usage from the ide.
One currently unsolved problem is testing. You can notice that the test
which checks precise diagnostic ranges, unresolved_import_in_use_tree,
was moved to the ide layer. Logically, only IDE should have the infra to
render a specific range.
At the same time, the range is determined with the data produced in
hir_def and hir crates, so this layering is rather unfortunate. Working
on hir_def shouldn't require compiling `ide` for testing.
8942: Add `library` semantic token modifier to items from other crates r=arzg a=arzg
Closes#5772.
A lot of code here is pretty repetitive; please let me know if you have any ideas how to improve it, or whether it’s fine as-is.
Side-note: How can I add tests for this? I don’t see a way for the test Rust code in `test_highlighting` to reference other crates to observe the new behaviour.
Co-authored-by: Aramis Razzaghipour <aramisnoah@gmail.com>
The problem was the skipping of binders in
`resolve_method_call_as_callable`; this still doesn't use the _correct_
substitution, but at least it doesn't return a type with free variables
in it.
Fixes#8931.
We can't do the easy hack that we did before anymore, where we kept
track of whether any inference variables changed since the last time we
rechecked obligations. Instead, we store the obligations in
canonicalized form; that way we can easily check the inference variables
to see whether they have changed since the goal was canonicalized.
8813: Get some more array lengths! r=lf- a=lf-
This is built on #8799 and thus contains its changes. I'll rebase it onto master when that one gets merged. It adds support for r-a understanding the length of:
* `let a: [u8; 2] = ...`
* `let a = b"aaa"`
* `let a = [0u8; 4]`
I have added support for getting the values of byte strings, which was not previously there. I am least confident in the correctness of this part and it probably needs some more tests, as we currently have only one test that exercised that part (!).
Fixes#2922.
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
Fix#2922: add unknown length as a condition for a type having unknown.
Incorporate reviews:
* Extract some of the const evaluation workings into functions
* Add fixmes on the hacks
* Add tests for impls on specific array lengths (these work!!! 😁)
* Add tests for const generics (indeed we don't support it yet)
8745: Support goto_type_definition for types r=matklad a=Veykril
I'm unsure if the approach of lowering an `ast::Type` to a `hir::Type` is a good idea, it seems fine to me at least.
Fixes#2882
Co-authored-by: Lukas Tobias Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
Store impls for e.g. &Foo with the ones for Foo instead of the big
"other" bucket. This can improve performance and simplifies the HIR impl
search a bit.
Almost all uses actually only care about ADT substs, so it's better to
be explicit. The methods were a bad abstraction anyway since they
already didn't include the inner types of e.g. `TyKind::Ref` anymore.
8284: Reduce memory usage by using global `Arc`-based interning r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This saves around 50 mb when running `analysis-stats` on r-a itself. Not a lot, but this infra can be easily reused to intern more stuff.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
7907: Autoderef with visibility r=cynecx a=cynecx
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7841.
I am not sure about the general approach here. Right now this simply tries to check whether the autoderef candidate is reachable from the current module. ~~However this doesn't exactly work with traits (see the `tests::macros::infer_derive_clone_in_core` test, which fails right now).~~ see comment below
Refs:
- `rustc_typeck` checking fields: 66ec64ccf3/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs (L1610)
r? @flodiebold
Co-authored-by: cynecx <me@cynecx.net>
By including the crate itself, we make the resulting set closed with
respect to `transitve_reveres_dependencies` operation, as it becomes a
proper transitive closure. This just feels more proper and mathy.
And, indeed, this actually allows us to simplify call sites somewhat.
This in particular means storing a chalk_ir::Environment, not our
TraitEnvironment. This makes InEnvironment not usable for Type, where we
need to keep the full TraitEnvironment.
8133: Ignore type bindings in generic_predicates_for_param (fix panic on ena and crates depending on it) r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This allows us to handle more cases without a query cycle, which includes certain cases that rustc accepted. That in turn means we avoid triggering salsa-rs/salsa#257 on valid code (it will still happen if the user writes an actual cycle).
We actually accept more definitions than rustc now; that's because rustc only ignores bindings when looking up super traits, whereas we now also ignore them when looking for predicates to disambiguate associated type shorthand. We could introduce a separate query for super traits if necessary, but for now I think this should be fine.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
This allows us to handle more cases without a query cycle, which
includes certain cases that rustc accepted. That in turn means we avoid
triggering salsa-rs/salsa#257 on valid code (it will still happen if the
user writes an actual cycle).
We actually accept more definitions than rustc now; that's because rustc
only ignores bindings when looking up super traits, whereas we now also
ignore them when looking for predicates to disambiguate associated type
shorthand. We could introduce a separate query for super traits if
necessary, but for now I think this should be fine.
7900: show function params in completion detail r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
This resolves#7842 by updating the detail for function completions from `-> T` to `fn(T, U) -> V`. I added an expicit unit test for this, `ide_completion::render::fn_detail_includes_args_and_return_type`, which passes.
Lots of other unit tests fail (~60 of them) due to this change, although I believe the failures are purely cosmetic (they were testing the exact format of this output). I'm happy to go update those tests, but before I do that I'd like to make sure this is in fact the format we want for the detail?
edit - I realized `UPDATE_EXPECT=1 cargo test` automatically updates `expect!` tests. Big 👍 to whoever worked on that! So I'll go ahead and update all these tests soon. But I still would like to confirm `fn(T, U) -> V` is the desired content in the `detail` field.
8000: Use hir formatter for hover text r=matklad a=oxalica
Fix#2765 , (should) fix#4665
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
8020: Power up goto_implementation r=matklad a=Veykril
by allowing it to be invoked on references of names, now showing all (trait)
implementations of the given type in all crates instead of just the defining
crate as well as including support for builtin types
Example screenshot of `impl`s of Box in `log`, `alloc`, `std` and the current crate. Before you had to invoke it on the definition where it would only show the `impls` in `alloc`.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
8018: Make Ty wrap TyKind in an Arc r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
... to further move towards Chalk.
This is a bit of a slowdown (218ginstr vs 213ginstr for inference on RA), even though it allows us to unwrap the Substs in `TyKind::Ref` etc..
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
What happens here is that we lower `: ` to a missing expression, and
then correctly record that the corresponding field expression resolves
to a specific field. Where we fail is in the mapping of syntax to this
missing expression. Doing it via `ast_field.expr()` fails, as that
expression is `None`. Instead, we go in the opposite direcition and ask
each lowered field about its source.
This works, but has wrong complexity `O(N)` and, really, the
implementation is just too complex. We need some better management of
data here.
