This PR allows using methods from traits that are visible but are defined in an inaccessible module (fixes#18241). For example,
```rust
mod foo {
pub use foo::bar::Tr;
mod bar { // This module is inaccessible from `g`
pub trait Tr { fn f(&self) {} }
}
}
fn g<T: foo::Tr>(t: T) {
t.f(); // Currently, this is a privacy error even though `foo::Tr` is visible
}
```
After this PR, it will continue to be a privacy error to use a method from a trait that is not visible. This can happen when a public trait inherits from a private trait (in violation of the `public_in_private` lint) -- see @petrochenkov's example in #28504.
r? @nikomatsakis
Now that 767d85061a is upstream, the relevant deadlocking issue which prompted our downgrade has been resolved. As a result, there's no known issue to *not* upgrade! This also re-enables jemalloc for the pc-windows-gnu target as known issues with that have also been fixed.
Closes#31030
This PR improves the import resolution algorithm.
First, it records that an import succeeded or failed for one namespace (by calling `decrement_outstanding_references_for` and `try_define_child` if successful) even if it is still indeterminate in the other namespace, fixing #31444.
Second, it starts importing bindings from globs as soon as the glob path is determined.
It maintains links from imported modules to their importers so that when a resolution becomes successful in an imported module, a corresponding binding will be added to the importer module.
It also maintains links from importer modules to imported modules so that we can determine if an undefined name is indeterminate or failing by recursively checking this in the imported modules.
This allows, for example:
```rust
mod foo {
pub mod baz {}
pub use bar::baz::*;
}
mod bar {
pub use foo::*;
}
```
It also allows cycles of pub glob imports, although by to the current shadowing rules, the only way for such a cycle to compile is if each participating module defines no names. Incidentally, this PR lays the groundwork for more permissive feature-gated shadowing rules.
Finally, this PR encapsulates almost all implementation details of import resolution in `resolve_imports` (some of which used to be in `lib.rs`) and refactors reexport recording, shadowed trait collecting, some duplicate checking, and the `private_in_public` lint out of the core import resolution algorithm and into a post-processing pass in `resolve_imports`.
r? @nrc
Right now there's just a smattering of `// ignore-foo` platforms which is ever
expanding as new ones are added. Instead switch to only running these tests on
Linux/OSX and then use a guaranteed-to-work but not-as-well-tested alternative
on other platforms.
- Empty `.sidebar .location` caused "grey line" on top of the documentation page (under 700px) fixed.
- `.sidebar .location` appearance improvement in responsive mode.
This PR changes the search paths for macro-expanded non-inline modules so that they match ordinary non-inline modules (fixes#31624). This is a [breaking-change].
Right now, the search paths for a macro-expanded non-inline module are computed as if the module were declared in the top level of the file in which the macro was defined.
For example, consider `./foo/mod.rs`:
```rust
mod inconsequential { // moving the macro outside this module wouldn't change anything
macro_rules! mod_decl {
($i:ident) => { mod $i; }
}
}
```
and `./lib.rs`:
```rust
mod foo;
mod bar {
mod_decl!(baz);
//^ Now, rustc expects `./foo/baz.rs` (or `./foo/baz/mod.rs`)
//| After this PR, rustc will expect `./bar/baz.rs` (or `./bar/baz/mod.rs`)
}
```
r? @alexcrichton
Show `cfg` as possible argument to `--print` and make it so that `--print cfg` also outputs the `target_feature`s.
Should I also extend `src/test/run-make/print-cfg/Makefile` to check that `target_feature`s are actually printed?
This PR extends compiletest to support **test revisions** and with a preliminary **incremental testing harness**. run-pass, compile-fail, and run-fail tests may be tagged with
```
// revisions: a b c d
```
This will cause the test to be re-run four times with `--cfg {a,b,c,d}` in turn. This means you can write very closely related things using `cfg`. You can also configure the headers/expected-errors by writing `//[foo] header: value` or `//[foo]~ ERROR bar`, where `foo` is the name of your revision. See the changes to `coherence-cow.rs` as a proof of concept.
The main point of this work is to support the incremental testing harness. This PR contains an initial, unused version. The code that uses it will land later. The incremental testing harness compiles each revision in turn, and requires that the revisions have particular names (e.g., `rpass2`, `cfail3`), which tell it whether a particular revision is expected to compile or not.
Two questions:
- Is there compiletest documentation anywhere I can update?
- Should I hold off on landing the incremental testing harness until I have the code to exercise it? (That will come in a separate PR, still fixing a few details)
r? @alexcrichton
cc @rust-lang/compiler <-- new testing capabilities
Gated cfg attributes are not available on the stable and beta release
channels, therefore they should not be presented to users of those
channels in order to avoid confusion.
Use `drop_in_place` in Vec and VecDeque
We can use drop_in_place's DST capabilities directly in Vec::drop and similarly in VecDeque::drop. I verfied this has the same effect as the previous `needs_drop` code; `drop_in_place` it itself an intrinsic.
The VecDeque replacement should be more efficient too, even in release mode (slice iteration makes a more efficient loop than the deque iterator).
This PR privacy checks paths as they are resolved instead of in `librustc_privacy` (fixes#12334 and fixes#31779). This removes the need for the `LastPrivate` system introduced in PR #9735, the limitations of which cause #31779.
This PR also reports privacy violations in paths to intra- and inter-crate items the same way -- it always reports the first inaccessible segment of the path.
Since it fixes#31779, this is a [breaking-change]. For example, the following code would break:
```rust
mod foo {
pub use foo::bar::S;
mod bar { // `bar` should be private to `foo`
pub struct S;
}
}
impl foo::S {
fn f() {}
}
fn main() {
foo::bar::S::f(); // This is now a privacy error
}
```
r? @alexcrichton
