This test has an interesting history, because of fail -> panic. It was
originally called extern-fail.rs:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commits/master/src/test/run-fail/extern-fail.rs
It lived for a while, but was disabled in August 2013:
ce95b01014
As you can see, that failure was not specific to this test, however,
this code does stuff with the runtime, which was removed. Given that
it hasn't even been able to compile in a long time, we should just
remove it.
r? @brson
Two commits here: one which removes a bunch of tests, and re-enables a few that work.
Second updates the syntax of one of the failing tests. It still doesn't pass, but at least it compiles.
This is a revert of PR #26008 which caused the unintended breakage reported in #26096. We may want to add these implementations in the long run, but for now this revert allows us to take some more time to evaluate the impact of such a change (e.g. run it through crater).
Closes#26096
This commit stabilizes the following APIs, slating them all to be cherry-picked
into the 1.1 release.
* fs::FileType (and transitively the derived trait implementations)
* fs::Metadata::file_type
* fs::FileType::is_dir
* fs::FileType::is_file
* fs::FileType::is_symlink
* fs::DirEntry::metadata
* fs::DirEntry::file_type
* fs::DirEntry::file_name
* fs::set_permissions
* fs::symlink_metadata
* os::raw::{self, *}
* os::{android, bitrig, linux, ...}::raw::{self, *}
* os::{android, bitrig, linux, ...}::fs::MetadataExt
* os::{android, bitrig, linux, ...}::fs::MetadataExt::as_raw_stat
* os::unix::fs::PermissionsExt
* os::unix::fs::PermissionsExt::mode
* os::unix::fs::PermissionsExt::set_mode
* os::unix::fs::PermissionsExt::from_mode
* os::unix::fs::OpenOptionsExt
* os::unix::fs::OpenOptionsExt::mode
* os::unix::fs::DirEntryExt
* os::unix::fs::DirEntryExt::ino
* os::windows::fs::MetadataExt
* os::windows::fs::MetadataExt::file_attributes
* os::windows::fs::MetadataExt::creation_time
* os::windows::fs::MetadataExt::last_access_time
* os::windows::fs::MetadataExt::last_write_time
* os::windows::fs::MetadataExt::file_size
The `os::unix::fs::Metadata` structure was also removed entirely, moving all of
its associated methods into the `os::unix::fs::MetadataExt` trait instead. The
methods are all marked as `#[stable]` still.
As some minor cleanup, some deprecated and unstable fs apis were also removed:
* File::path
* Metadata::accessed
* Metadata::modified
Features that were explicitly left unstable include:
* fs::WalkDir - the semantics of this were not considered in the recent fs
expansion RFC.
* fs::DirBuilder - it's still not 100% clear if the naming is right here and if
the set of functionality exposed is appropriate.
* fs::canonicalize - the implementation on Windows here is specifically in
question as it always returns a verbatim path. Additionally the Unix
implementation is susceptible to buffer overflows on long paths unfortunately.
* fs::PathExt - as this is just a convenience trait, it is not stabilized at
this time.
* fs::set_file_times - this funciton is still waiting on a time abstraction.
Most of these are old, but some specific messages for specific tests:
* trait-contravariant-self.rs: failed due to a soundess hole:
05e3248a79
* process-detatch: 15966c3c1f
says "this test is being ignored until signals are implemented" That's
not happening for a long time, and when it is, we'll write tests for
it.
* deep-vector{,2}.rs: "too big for our poor macro infrastructure", and has
been ignored over a year.
* borrowck-nested-calls.rs's FIXME #6268 was closed in favor of
rust-lang/rfcs#811
* issue-15167.rs works properly now
* issue-9737.rs works properly now
* match-var-hygiene.rs works properly now
Addresses a chunk of #3965
This test has an interesting history, because of fail -> panic. It was
originally called extern-fail.rs:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commits/master/src/test/run-fail/extern-fail.rs
It lived for a while, but was disabled in August 2013:
ce95b01014
As you can see, that failure was not specific to this test, however,
this code does stuff with the runtime, which was removed. Given that
it hasn't even been able to compile in a long time, we should just
remove it.
Explain the --bin flag in terms of the difference
between shipping binary and library code
I'm not sure if my explanation is even quite correct, but as a newbie coming from Ruby, this is my best guess. (In Rubyland, libraries always ship with the source code because there's no other form you can ship. :) )
