A Google search of the error message fails to return any relevant
resuts, suggesting this has never occurred in practice. And removeing it
reduces instruction counts by up to 2% on some benchmarks.
Previously, we would retrieve the span from the `Body` using
the `locations` field. However, we may end up changing the
`locations` field when moving a constraint from a promoted
to a different body.
We now store the original `Span` in a dedication field, so that
changes to the `locations` do not affect the quality of our
diagnostics.
The loop is there to handle a `NoDelim` open/close token. This commit
changes `TokenCursor::inlined_next` so it never returns such a token.
This is a performance win because the conditional test in `bump()` is
removed.
If the parser needs changing in the future to handle `NoDelim` tokens,
then `inlined_next()` can easily be changed to return them.
The `DelimToken` here is `NoDelim`, which means the returned delim
tokens will just be ignored by `Parser::bump()`. This commit changes
things so the delim tokens won't be returned.
Temporarily, only enable split debuginfo on Windows if not building with
the boostrap compiler as there is a bug that isn't fixed in the
bootstrap compiler which would result in `thorin` being run on Windows.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95740 (asm: Add a kreg0 register class on x86 which includes k0)
- #95813 (Remove extra space before a where clause)
- #96029 (Refactor loop into iterator; simplify negation logic.)
- #96162 (interpret: Fix writing uninit to an allocation)
- #96165 (Miri provenance cleanup)
- #96205 (Use futex locks on emscripten.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Miri provenance cleanup
Reviewing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95826 by ``@carbotaniuman`` made me realize that we could clean things up a little here.
``@carbotaniuman`` please let me know if you're okay with landing this (it will create a lot of conflicts with your PR), or if you'd prefer incorporating the ideas from this PR into yours. I think we want to end up in a situation where the function you called `ptr_reify_alloc` returns just two things, a concrete tag and an offset. Getting an `AllocId` from a concrete tag should be infallible like now. However a concrete tag and `Tag` don't have to be the same type.
r? ``@oli-obk``
interpret: Fix writing uninit to an allocation
When calling `mark_init`, we need to also be mindful of what happens with the relocations! Specifically, when we de-init memory, we need to clear relocations in that range as well or else strange things will happen (and printing will not show the de-init, since relocations take precedence there).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2068.
Here's the Miri testcase that this fixes (requires `-Zmiri-disable-validation`):
```rust
use std::mem::MaybeUninit;
fn main() { unsafe {
let mut x = MaybeUninit::<i64>::uninit();
// Put in a ptr.
x.as_mut_ptr().cast::<&i32>().write_unaligned(&0);
// Overwrite parts of that pointer with 'uninit' through a Scalar.
let ptr = x.as_mut_ptr().cast::<i32>();
*ptr = MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init();
// Reading this back should hence work fine.
let _c = *ptr;
} }
```
Previously this failed with
```
error: unsupported operation: unable to turn pointer into raw bytes
--> ../miri/uninit.rs:11:14
|
11 | let _c = *ptr;
| ^^^^ unable to turn pointer into raw bytes
|
= help: this is likely not a bug in the program; it indicates that the program performed an operation that the interpreter does not support
= note: inside `main` at ../miri/uninit.rs:11:14
```
Refactor loop into iterator; simplify negation logic.
is_dummy should return when a non-dummy is found, but instead is iterated until completion. With some inspiration from line 323 this was refactored to a single line that returns once a single counterexample is found.
asm: Add a kreg0 register class on x86 which includes k0
Previously we only exposed a kreg register class which excludes the k0
register since it can't be used in many instructions. However k0 is a
valid register and we need to have a way of marking it as clobbered for
clobber_abi.
Fixes#94977
This implementation returns a best attempt at the current exe path. On
fuchsia, fdio will always use `argv[0]` as the process name and if it is
not set then an error will be returned. Because this is not guaranteed
to be the case, this implementation returns an error if `argv` does not
contain any elements.
- Cache doc link resolutions obtained early
- Cache markdown links retrieved from doc strings early
- Rename and restructure the code in early doc link resolution to be closer to #94857
Previously we only exposed a kreg register class which excludes the k0
register since it can't be used in many instructions. However k0 is a
valid register and we need to have a way of marking it as clobbered for
clobber_abi.
Fixes#94977
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94493 (Improved diagnostic on failure to meet send bound on future in a foreign crate)
- #95809 (Fix typo in bootstrap.py)
- #96086 (Remove `--extern-location` and all associated code)
- #96089 (`alloc`: make `vec!` unavailable under `no_global_oom_handling`)
- #96122 (Fix an invalid error for a suggestion to add a slice in pattern-matching)
- #96142 (Stop using CRATE_DEF_INDEX outside of metadata encoding.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Stop using CRATE_DEF_INDEX outside of metadata encoding.
`CRATE_DEF_ID` and `CrateNum::as_def_id` are almost always what we want. We should not manipulate raw `DefIndex` outside of metadata encoding.
`alloc`: make `vec!` unavailable under `no_global_oom_handling`
`alloc`: make `vec!` unavailable under `no_global_oom_handling`
The `vec!` macro has 3 rules, but two are not usable under
`no_global_oom_handling` builds of the standard library
(even with a zero size):
```rust
let _ = vec![42]; // Error: requires `exchange_malloc` lang_item.
let _ = vec![42; 0]; // Error: cannot find function `from_elem`.
```
Thus those two rules should not be available to begin with.
The remaining one, with an empty matcher, is just a shorthand for
`new()` and may not make as much sense to have alone, since the
idea behind `vec!` is to enable `Vec`s to be defined with the same
syntax as array expressions. Furthermore, the documentation can be
confusing since it shows the other rules.
Thus perhaps it is better and simpler to disable `vec!` entirely
under `no_global_oom_handling` environments, and let users call
`new()` instead:
```rust
let _: Vec<i32> = vec![];
let _: Vec<i32> = Vec::new();
```
Notwithstanding this, a `try_vec!` macro would be useful, such as
the one introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95051.
If the shorthand for `new()` is deemed worth keeping on its own,
then it may be interesting to have a separate `vec!` macro with
a single rule and different, simpler documentation.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Remove `--extern-location` and all associated code
`--extern-location` was an experiment to investigate the best way to
generate useful diagnostics for unused dependency warnings by enabling a
build system to identify the corresponding build config.
While I did successfully use this, I've since been convinced the
alternative `--json unused-externs` mechanism is the way to go, and
there's no point in having two mechanisms with basically the same
functionality.
This effectively reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72603
Improved diagnostic on failure to meet send bound on future in a foreign crate
Provide a better diagnostic on failure to meet send bound on futures in a foreign crate.
fixes#78543
This will facilitate the change in the next commit.
`boolean` arguments aren't great, but the function is only used in three
places within this one file.
In particular, avoid wrapping a token within `TokenTree::Token` and then
immediately matching it and returning the token within. Just return the
token immediately.
